Harvest Monitoring and Evaluation Designs

Harvest monitoring is an essential component of salmonid recovery efforts to allow economically and culturally important fisheries to continue while ensuring impacts to ESA-listed stocks are kept within acceptable rates. Fisheries are the single activity fully within the control of fish managers and they cause direct and delayed-mortality losses to returning adult fish and are the subject of much scrutiny. A full accounting of fishery-related mortality is important to describing abundance and productivity of these stocks and quantifying population trends.

CSMEP's Harvest subgroup is focused on:

  • understanding and describing the methods used to monitor these fisheries
  • describing the accuracy and precision (where possible) of parameters used to quantify ESA impacts, and
  • exploring alternative monitoring designs that could contribute to a better accounting of fishery related losses and improved population status and trend monitoring

Fisheries are characterized by species sought, seasonality, geography, and gear type. Columbia Basin fisheries can be separated into four major regional/gear categories:

  1. non-Indian commercial fisheries conducted downstream from Bonneville Dam
  2. treaty commercial, ceremonial, and subsistence fisheries conducted in the three reservoir areas bounded by Bonneville and McNary dams
  3. mainstem sport fisheries in the Columbia and Snake rivers
  4. tributary sport and treaty fisheries conducted in Columbia and Snake river tributaries

The CSMEP Harvest workgroup is developing generalized fishery models based on the current fishery impact models used by agency managers to assess fishing mortality of ESA -listed stocks. Within these models an impact is an ESU-specific mortality rate attributed to a specific fishery. Impact models incorporate all available fishery monitoring data, such as preseason and in-season run forecasts, harvest, release rates, post-release mortality rates, stock composition, and hatchery marking rates. These generalized models will be used to determine sensitivity of perceived impacts to changes in harvest monitoring designs by varying model input parameters within known or expected ranges. These sensitivity analyses will be used to evaluate the relative cost and precision of current and alternative harvest monitoring designs for assessing harvest impacts.

Additional Information Associated with Harvest Monitoring and Evaluation Designs
Harvest Monitoring

Final Work Product Documents Associated with Harvest Monitoring and Evaluation Designs
Harvest Data Quality Objectives Presentation
Harvest Subgroup DQO for Steps 6 & 7 Presentation
Harvest Effectiveness Monitoring Design Presentation
Harvest Monitoring: Status of Current Designs and Associated Evaluative Tools
Impact of commercial selective fisheries on wild Upriver spring Chinook salmon in the lower Columbia River
CSMEP Harvest Subgroup - Data Quality Objectives (DQO) Summary

Technical Harvest Reports/Links
ISAB: Report on Harvest Management of Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead

See all documents related to the Harvest Monitoring and Evaluation Designs Workgroup


Last Updated by Facilitator on 6/15/2006