March 27, 2001
To:
|
Members Management Group (MMG) |
FROM:
|
Brian Allee
|
SUBJECT: |
Draft 3/26/01 MMG Action Notes |
EMERGENCY MEMBERS MANAGEMENT GROUP
MEETING/CONFERENCE CALL
March 26, 2001
1:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.
CBFWA Office, Portland, OR
Draft Action Notes
Attendees: |
Phil Roger, CRITFC; Fred Olney, USFWS; Susan Barnes, ODFW, Roy
Sampsel, CRITFC; Kathie Titzler, Frank Young, Tom Giese, Jann Eckman,
Tom Iverson, Neil Ward, CBFWA |
By Phone: |
Gary James, CTUIR; Sue Ireland, KTI; Brian Marotz, MDFWP; Amos
First Raised, BPT, Dan Gonzales, BPT; Robert Matt, CdAT; Lynn Hatcher,
YN, Theodora Strong, YN; Bob Foster, WDFW; Ron Peters, CdAT; Bert
Bowler, IDFG; Bill Tweit, WDFW; Carl Scheeler, CTUIR; Dave Statler,
NPT; B.J. Kieffer, ST |
Time Allocation: |
Objective 1. FY 2002 Renewal Process
Objective 2. Rolling Province Review and Subbasin Summaries
Objective 3. FY 2001 Adjustments
|
0%
0%
100%
|
ITEM 1: |
Update on FY 2001 Budgets – Reports from Tom Giese and the
F&W Committees |
Discussion: |
Tom Giese reviewed updated tables from the 3/16/01 Quarterly Review
meeting. The wildlife number is uncertain due to questioning
allocation on Data Management (Item 2) and ODFW/BPA numbers. Robert
asked on a policy level what is the priority. Is it to fund the
projects identified out of the rolling review process prior to other
projects being allocated placeholder funds? We should state that we
have used all funds regardless of the placeholder allocation to fund
all ongoing projects at the recommended level and the new starts
identified in the provincial review process, then go with requests for
the other new projects |
|
(coordination contract, etc.). Concerns were expressed that we were
changing the allocation percentage. It was clarified that we are not
changing the allocation percentage, but listing project needs and
placeholder funds. Any allocation changes would be addressed at a
different meeting.
Roy advised the MMG to be very clear about what we want to
accomplish – capture it in a sentence, and have this discussion at
the 4/12/01 Members Meeting also |
ACTION: |
Tom Giese will put a budget package together detailing the
following:
1. Combine unallocated balances from three committees.
2. Identify the unfunded new starts and identify the rolling review
recommendations as current needs.
3. Display in chronological order from 2000-2001 as part of the
rolling provincial review as mandated by the NWPPC.
4. Separate additional funds for on-going and new starts.
He will send this package out to the MMG the morning of Wednesday,
March 28th. |
ITEM 2: |
Request from Wildlife Committee to Not Fund Part of Data Management
Place Holder |
ACTION: |
This item was discussed as part of Item 1.
|
ITEM 3: |
Discuss Members Testimony at the NWPPC F&W Committee, April 3,
2001 in Boise |
Discussion: |
Bert asked who was going to participate in the meeting.
Participants so far are: Bill Tweitt, WDFW; Carl Sheeler, CTUIR; Amos
First-Raised and Dan Gonzales, BPT; Sue Ireland, KT, Theodora Strong,
YN. Bert said we need a list of participants who will be at the
pre-meeting and the focus will be funding. Carl said that he and Ron
Boyce have already been discussing this issue with John Brogoitti. Roy
said if we can get Stan Grace, we should ask him to bring Leo
Giacometto and that he would be happy to take the funding package that
Tom Giese is putting together to the NWPPC members and do one-on-one
briefings. Roy asked if NMFS would be able to support this proposal
and suggested MMG try to get Brian Brown or Donna Darm at the April 3rd
meeting or at least participate by conference call. If we are not able
to get them at the meeting perhaps we could get them to write a letter
of support. |
ACTION: |
Bert will contact Fred Olney and Brian Brown to try and get Donna
Darm to attend or write a letter of support. Carl will contact
Brogoitti and try and get Stan Grace and Leo there. Carl will put
together the agenda for the Brogoitti pre-meeting and CTUIR and ODFW
will facilitate the meeting. Tom Giese will prepare his packet as
directed under Item 1 and will present it, identified as the cost of
putting the products together (in excess of available funds for those
products), even though the cost was greater than those funds expended.
The products will be the foundation for the subbasin plans. |
ITEM 4: |
FY 2001 Funding Requests from AFC – Hagerman Research Center
& Chumstick Culvert |
Discussion: |
Phil summarized the Hagerman request. He said that the AFC had
reviewed on 3/21 and recommended it be forwarded to MMG for review and
approval. Roy summarized the Chumstick request that was also approved
by the AFC and recommended it be forwarded to the MMG. |
ACTION: |
MMG approved the Hagerman and Chumstick requests and recommended
forwarding to Members for consent mail approval. |
|