BPA Fish and Wildlife FY 1997 Proposal
Section 1. Administrative
Section 2. Narrative
Section 3. Budget
see CBFWA and BPA funding recommendations
Section 1. Administrative
Title of project
Surface Collection and Bypass
BPA project number 5516400
Business name of agency, institution or organization requesting funding
TBD
Sponsor type Placeholder
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
| Name | TBD | |
| Mailing address | ||
| Phone |
BPA technical contact ,
Biological opinion ID RM&EP, Hypothesis B4.1.
NWPPC Program number 5.6A.11, 5.6A.7, 5.6A.9
Short description
Project would attempt to prove/disprove hypothesis that surface collection/bypass is ineffective at increasing passage efficiency and timing at powerhouses and spillways of mainstem dams.
Project start year 1997 End year
Start of operation and/or maintenance 0
Project development phase PLANNING
Section 2. Narrative
Related projects
The COE is presently studying surface collection/bypass under their Anadromous Fish Evaluation Program: FY96 projects include:
TDA - SCD96(3)-1; SCD96(1)-2; SCD96(3)-3; SCD96(1)-4; SCD96(1)-5
BON - SCB96(3)-1; SCB96(1)-2; SCB96(3)-3
JDA - SCJ96(3)-1; SCJ96(3)-2; SCJ96(1)-3
LGR - LSFR-96-1; SBC-96-1; SBC-96-2
Project history
Biological results achieved
Annual reports and technical papers
Management implications
Results of study could affect volumes and timing of flows and spill needed during the spring/summer migration and need for transportation program; this in turn could affect amount and timing of availability of power from the hydrosystem. . In addition, the results of this study should clearly either support or counter the use of surface collection and bypass systems to improve juvenile salmon survival, thereby directing the use of available funds to those measures that are truly improving the survival of listed stocks.
Specific measureable objectives
Determine effectiveness of surface collector in increasing existing FGE at mainstem dams.
Testable hypothesis
SURFACE COLLECTION/BYPASS IS INEFFECTIVE AT INCREASING PASSAGE EFFICIENCY AND TIMING AT POWERHOUSES AND SPILLWAYS OF MAINSTEM DAMS.
Underlying assumptions or critical constraints
Methods
Brief schedule of activities
Biological need
Critical uncertainties
Summary of expected outcome
Dependencies/opportunities for cooperation
Risks
Monitoring activity
Section 3. Budget
Data shown are the total of expense and capital obligations by fiscal year. Obligations for any given year may not equal actual expenditures or accruals within the year, due to carryover, pre-funding, capitalization and difference between operating year and BPA fiscal year.| Historic costs | FY 1996 budget data* | Current and future funding needs |
| (none) | New project - no FY96 data available | 1997: |
* For most projects, Authorized is the amount recommended by CBFWA and the Council. Planned is amount currently allocated. Contracted is the amount obligated to date of printout.
Funding recommendations
CBFWA funding review group System Policy
Recommendation Tier 2 - fund when funds available
Recommended funding level