FY07-09 proposal 200703700

Jump to Reviews and Recommendations

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleNorth Fork Toutle River Fish Passage
Proposal ID200703700
OrganizationSteward and Associates
Short descriptionThe goal of the proposed project is to reconnect and maximize isolated salmonid habitat in the North Fork Toutle River watershed upstream of the Sediment Retention Structure (SRS).
Information transferInformation gathered throughout the proposed project will be distributed through journal publication and will be used as a guide for similar fish passage restoration projects.
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Contacts
ContactOrganizationEmail
Form submitter
Dustin Hinson Steward and Associates dhinson@stewardandassociates.com
All assigned contacts
Dustin Hinson Steward and Associates dhinson@stewardandassociates.com
Dustin Hinson Steward and Associates dhinson@stewardandassociates.com

Section 2. Locations

Province / subbasin: Lower Columbia / Cowlitz

LatitudeLongitudeWaterbodyDescription
North Fork Toutle River This is the location of the Sediment Retention Structure, which blocks the passage of fish to the upper watershed.

Section 3. Focal species

primary: Coho Lower Columbia River ESU
primary: Steelhead Lower Columbia River ESU
secondary: Chinook Lower Columbia River ESU
secondary: Coastal Cutthroat Southwest Washington/Columbia River ESU

Section 4. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishments

Section 5. Relationships to other projects

Funding sourceRelated IDRelated titleRelationship
Other: NOAA Fisheries PCSRF [no entry] Survival, Movement, and Spawning Distribution of Adult Salmonids in the North Fork Toutle River NOAA Fisheries is partially funding the 2005-2006 coho and steelhead radio tracking study in the NF Toutle watershed
Other: USGS PO# 05WRS0517 Survival, Movement, and Spawning Distribution of Adult Salmonids in the North Fork Toutle River USGS is partially funding the 2005-2006 coho and steelhead radio tracking study in the NF Toutle watershed
Other: Army Corps of Engineers 130344 Survival, Movement, and Spawning Distribution of Adult Salmonids in the North Fork Toutle River The Army Corps of Engineers is using Planning and Assistance to States funds to partially fund the 2005-2006 coho and steelhead radio tracking study in the NF Toutle watershed

Section 6. Biological objectives

Biological objectivesFull descriptionAssociated subbasin planStrategy
Assess fish collection and passage factors To achieve this objective, we will conduct an engineering feasibility assessment of the factors influencing fish collection and release at the FCF, and fish passage through the SRS spillway. Lower Columbia The number 1 priority in the Toutle River watershed is to address passage and sedimentation issues associated with the sediment retention structure on the North Fork Toutle River.
Develop fish collection and passage actions To achieve this objective, we will utilize results of the radiotelemetry study and the feasibility assessment to identify and analyze actions that will address observed collection and release problems with the FCF, and passage problems with the SRS Lower Columbia The number 1 priority in the Toutle River watershed is to address passage and sedimentation issues associated with the sediment retention structure on the North Fork Toutle River.
Measure coho and steelhead migratory performance To achieve this objective, we will use radiotelemetry to quantitatively measure the migratory performance of adult coho and steelhead in relation to the FCF and SRS in the NF Toutle River watershed. Lower Columbia The number 1 priority in the Toutle River watershed is to address passage and sedimentation issues associated with the sediment retention structure on the North Fork Toutle River.

Section 7. Work elements (coming back to this)

Work element nameWork element titleDescriptionStart dateEnd dateEst budget
Install Fish Monitoring Equipment Setup and Maintain Radio Telemetry Fixed Sites This work element will involve selecting sites for fixed radio telemetry equipment and installation of the equipment. It would also include maintenance of the equipment over the study period. 10/1/2006 9/30/2009 $15,120
Biological objectives
Measure coho and steelhead migratory performance
Metrics
Mark/Tag Animals Radiotag coho and steelhead adults The work element involves implanting radiotransmitters into the gastric cavity of fish and releasing them into the NF Toutle River. 10/15/2006 4/30/2009 $55,350
Biological objectives
Measure coho and steelhead migratory performance
Metrics
Focal Area: Mainstem NF Toutle River and Tributaries
Primary R, M, and E Type: Uncertainties Research
Secondary R, M, and E Type: Action Effectiveness Research
Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data Radiotrack Tagged Fish We will collect position information on radiotagged fish through fixed site receiver downloads and mobile tracking by foot and by vehicle. 10/15/2006 6/1/2009 $54,030
Biological objectives
Measure coho and steelhead migratory performance
Metrics
Focal Area: Mainstem and Tributaries
Primary R, M, and E Type: Uncertainties Research
Secondary R, M, and E Type: Action Effectiveness Research
Analyze/Interpret Data Analyze Radiotelemetry Data We will analyze the radiotracking data collected from the tagged coho and steelhead. 1/1/2007 9/30/2009 $15,750
Biological objectives
Measure coho and steelhead migratory performance
Metrics
Focal Area: Mainstem and Tributaries
Primary R, M, and E Type: Uncertainties Research
Secondary R, M, and E Type: Action Effectiveness Research
Produce/Submit Scientific Findings Report Produce Radiotelemetry Report We will produce a document that contains the results of our radiotelemetry study. 1/1/2007 9/30/2009 $41,800
Biological objectives
Measure coho and steelhead migratory performance
Metrics
Produce Inventory or Assessment Feasibility Assessment of Fish Passage Alternatives [Work Element Description Not Entered] 10/1/2006 9/30/2009 $84,200
Biological objectives
Assess fish collection and passage factors
Metrics
Produce Plan Fish Passage Restoration Plan Fish passage experts, working with USACE engineers, agency biologists, and stakeholders, will identify preliminary feasibility-level alternatives for reestablishing anadromous fish populations in the upper reaches of the NF Toutle River utilizing engineering feasibility assessment results and radiotelemetry study results. Recommendations will provide a basis to analyze and select a preferred alternative for either providing fish passage through the Sediment Retention Structure (SRS) or improving operation of the Fish Collection Facility (FCF), or perhaps both. 10/1/2008 9/30/2009 $43,600
Biological objectives
Develop fish collection and passage actions
Metrics

Section 8. Budgets

Itemized estimated budget
ItemNoteFY07FY08FY09
Personnel [blank] $75,440 $66,670 $97,595
Fringe Benefits [blank] $9,470 $9,000 $9,675
Supplies Most supplies and equipment are donated or purchased with cost sharing funds $2,000 $2,000 $2,000
Travel Most travel covered by cost sharing funds $2,000 $2,000 $2,000
Overhead [blank] $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
Totals $98,910 $89,670 $121,270
Total estimated FY 2007-2009 budgets
Total itemized budget: $309,850
Total work element budget: $309,850
Cost sharing
Funding source/orgItem or service providedFY 07 est value ($)FY 08 est value ($)FY 09 est value ($)Cash or in-kind?Status
Lou Reebs In-kind funds for project input and consultation $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 In-Kind Confirmed
Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Funds Purchase of Radiotransmitters and Equipment $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 Cash Under Review
US Army Corps of Engineers In-kind funds for project input and consultation $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 In-Kind Confirmed
USGS Radio telemetry receivers and other tracking equipment, Trailer $93,000 $93,000 $93,000 In-Kind Confirmed
USGS Reimbursement of Travel Costs $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 Cash Under Review
WDFW In-kind labor for tagging and release operations $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 In-Kind Confirmed
Totals $167,000 $167,000 $167,000

Section 9. Project future

FY 2010 estimated budget: $300,000
FY 2011 estimated budget: $300,000
Comments: Future funds will be used for habitat restoration projects in the upper watershed to maximize production of the 50 miles of habitat that will become available to anadromous fish.

Future O&M costs:

Termination date: None
Comments: This project will continue, with future research projects to monitor spawning and rearing success in the upper watershed, as well as habitat restoration projects where they would be most useful.

Final deliverables: There will be reports prepared annually that will document the ongoing status and distribution of all anadromous fish in the upper watershed, as well as any other habitat restoration work that has been or is being completed. Several manuscripts will likely be produced and published in peer reviewed journals during and after the study.

Section 10. Narrative and other documents


Reviews and recommendations

FY07 budget FY08 budget FY09 budget Total budget Type Category Recommendation
NPCC FINAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Oct 23, 2006) [full Council recs]
$98,910 $89,670 $121,270 $309,850 Expense ProvinceExpense Fund
NPCC DRAFT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Sep 15, 2006) [full Council recs]
$103,333 $103,333 $103,333 $0 ProvinceExpense
Comments: BPA preliminary in lieu determination

ISRP PRELIMINARY REVIEW (Jun 2, 2006)

Recommendation: Fundable

NPCC comments: The very low escapement for coho and steelhead in the North Fork Toutle River in recent years indicates that the current practice of collecting adult of these species and steelhead at the Fish Collection Facility (FCF) and hauling by truck and releasing up-river above the Sediment Retention System (SRS) may be ineffective for seeding considerable amounts of good spawning habitat up-river. This project will determine: 1) passage success through the Sediment Retention System spillway and subsequent up-river migration in the North Fork Toutle and 2) collection efficiency of the Fish Collection Facility. This would provide the information needed to either improve the collection facility or alter the spillway (or both) to allow better adult passage. The ISRP rates this proposal as fundable. The proposal is well done, addresses a very high priority recommendation in the Lower Columbia River Fish Recovery Board Subbasin Plan, and appears to address a critical need for recovery of these two focal species in this subbasin. Other comments: This proposal needs to define what is meant by "quantitatively measure the migratory performance of adult coho and steelhead in relation to the FCF and SRS" and describe how passage success would be measured (e.g. percent passed, time to pass, fallbacks, etc.) and potential long-term outcomes of this passage in aiding recovery of these two species.


ISRP FINAL REVIEW (Aug 31, 2006)

Recommendation: Fundable

NPCC comments: The very low escapement for coho and steelhead in the North Fork Toutle River in recent years indicates that the current practice of collecting adult of these species and steelhead at the Fish Collection Facility (FCF) and hauling by truck and releasing up-river above the Sediment Retention System (SRS) may be ineffective for seeding considerable amounts of good spawning habitat up-river. This project will determine: 1) passage success through the Sediment Retention System spillway and subsequent up-river migration in the North Fork Toutle and 2) collection efficiency of the Fish Collection Facility. This would provide the information needed to either improve the collection facility or alter the spillway (or both) to allow better adult passage. The ISRP rates this proposal as fundable. The proposal is well done, addresses a very high priority recommendation in the Lower Columbia River Fish Recovery Board Subbasin Plan, and appears to address a critical need for recovery of these two focal species in this subbasin. Other comments: This proposal needs to define what is meant by "quantitatively measure the migratory performance of adult coho and steelhead in relation to the FCF and SRS" and describe how passage success would be measured (e.g. percent passed, time to pass, fallbacks, etc.) and potential long-term outcomes of this passage in aiding recovery of these two species.