FY07-09 proposal 199106200

Jump to Reviews and Recommendations

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleSpokane Tribe Wildlife Mitigation
Proposal ID199106200
OrganizationSpokane Tribe
Short descriptionThe project is the Spokane Tribes Wildlife Mitigation Project that acquires property as partial mitigation for construction and inundation losses at Grand Coulee Dam. FY07-09 will focus on the acquisition of Forest Capital lands on the Reservation.
Information transferInformation will be submitted electronically or online via Pisces.
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Contacts
ContactOrganizationEmail
Form submitter
Kelly Singer Spokane Tribe of Indians kellys@spokanetribe.com
All assigned contacts
Kelly Singer Spokane Tribe of Indians kellys@spokanetribe.com

Section 2. Locations

Province / subbasin: Intermountain / Spokane

LatitudeLongitudeWaterbodyDescription
Spokane Indian Reservation
Spokane Indian Reservation

Section 3. Focal species

primary: All Wildlife
Additional: Wildlife species include the Grand Coulee Dam Loss Species (mule deer, white-tailed deer, ruffed grouse, sharp-tailed grouse, mourning dove, and riparian forest habitat.

Section 4. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishments
2005 Acquired Allotment 154 (148.59 acres)
2004 Acquire Allotment 65-C (40 acres), Lantzy East & West (85 & 124.3 acres), Parson East & West (200.55 & 300.75 acres), and Sampson (565.82 acres).
2003 No acquisitions
2002 No acquisitions
2001 No acquisitions
2000 No acquisitions
1999 Acquired Etue (74 acres), People (440 acres), and Blue Creek Swap (737-acre swap for checker boarded lands that had been purchased in previous years)
1998 Acquired Smith (160 acres)
1997 Acquired Kenworthy (40 acres), Kieffer (40 acres), and Harris (180 acres)
1996 Acquireed Allotment 67-B (80 acres)
1995 Acquired Allotment 401-A (35 acres)
1994 No acquisitions
1993 No acquisitions
1992 No acquisitions
1991 Acquired Allotment 322 (77.5 acres)

Section 5. Relationships to other projects

Funding sourceRelated IDRelated titleRelationship
BPA 199800300 Spokane Tribe Wildlife Mitigation O&M This is the Spokane Tribes O&M project for lands that are acquired in the land acquisition project.
BPA 199106100 Swanson Lake Wildlife Mitigati This is part of Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife's mitigation for Grand Coulee Dam widlife losses.
BPA 199204800 Hellsgate Big Game Winter Rang This is part of the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation's mitigation for Grand Coulee Dam wildlife losses.

Section 6. Biological objectives

Biological objectivesFull descriptionAssociated subbasin planStrategy
Spokane Subbasin Objective 1A Fully mitigate for terrestrial resource losses incurred from construction and inundation of the Grand Coulee Project per the requirements of the Northwest Power Act. Complete the compensation mitigation for construction losses at Grand Coulee Dam for wildlife and wildlife habitat consistent with the HEP loss assessment by year 2015. Intermountain Strategy a,b,c,d,e,f
Spokane Subbasin Objective 1A2 Protect, enhance, or restore mourning dove Habitat Units to address riparian and agricultural habitat losses resulting from construction of the Grand Coulee Project. Intermountain Strategy a,b,c
Spokane Subbasin Objective 1A3 Protect, enhance, or restore mule deer Habitat Units to address shrub-steppe and river break habitat losses resulting from construction of the Grand Coulee Project. Intermountain Strategy a,b,c
Spokane Subbasin Objective 1A4 Protect, enhance, or restore riparian forest Habitat Units to address habitat losses resulting from construction of the Grand Coulee Project. Intermountain Strategy a,b,c,d,e
Spokane Subbasin Objective 1A6 Protect, enhance, or restore ruffed grouse Habitat Units to address riparian/hardwood forest habitat losses resulting from construction of the Grand Coulee Project. Intermountain Strategy a,b,c
Spokane Subbasin Objective 1A8 Protect, enhance, or restore sharp-tailed grouse Habitat Units to address grasslands, shrub-steppe, and riparian draw habitat losses resulting from construction of the Grand Coulee Project. Intermountain Strategy a,b,c
Spokane Subbasin Objective 1A9 Protect, enhance, or restore white-tailed deer Habitat Units to address seral forest habitat losses resulting from construction of the Grand Coulee Project. Intermountain Strategy a,b,c,f
Support Work Element For support of work elements that do not address biological objectives, but are require to complete the project. Intermountain No specific strategy
Upper Columbia Subbasin Objective 1A Fully mitigate for terrestrial resource losses incurred from construction and inundation of the Grand Coulee Project per the requirements of the Northwest Power Act. Complete the compensation mitigation for construction losses at Grand Coulee Dam for wildlife and wildlife habitat consistent with the HEP loss assessment by year 2015. Intermountain Strategy b
Upper Columbia Subbasin Objective 1A2 Protect, enhance, or restore mourning dove Habitat Units to address riparian and agricultural habitat losses resulting from construction of the Grand Coulee Project. Intermountain Strategy b
Upper Columbia Subbasin Objective 1A3 Protect, enhance, or restore mule deer Habitat Units to address shrub-steppe and river break habitat losses resulting from construction of the Grand Coulee Project. Intermountain Strategy b
Upper Columbia Subbasin Objective 1A4 Protect, enhance, or restore riparian forest Habitat Units to address habitat losses resulting from construction of the Grand Coulee Project. Intermountain Strategy b
Upper Columbia Subbasin Objective 1A6 Protect, enhance, or restore ruffed grouse Habitat Units to address riparian/hardwood forest habitat losses resulting from construction of the Grand Coulee Project. Intermountain Strategy b
Upper Columbia Subbasin Objective 1A8 Protect, enhance, or restore sharp-tailed grouse Habitat Units to address grasslands, shrub-steppe, and riparian draw habitat losses resulting from construction of the Grand Coulee Project. Intermountain Strategy b
Upper Columbia Subbasin Objective 1A9 Protect, enhance, or restore white-tailed deer Habitat Units to address seral forest habitat losses resulting from construction of the Grand Coulee Project. Intermountain Strategy b

Section 7. Work elements (coming back to this)

Work element nameWork element titleDescriptionStart dateEnd dateEst budget
Land Purchase Purchase land for Wildlife Mitigation. Purchasing of a property for partial mitigation for wildlife losses associated with the Grand Coulee Dam Project. 10/1/2006 9/30/2009 $6,750,000
Biological objectives
Spokane Subbasin Objective 1A
Spokane Subbasin Objective 1A2
Spokane Subbasin Objective 1A3
Spokane Subbasin Objective 1A4
Spokane Subbasin Objective 1A6
Spokane Subbasin Objective 1A8
Spokane Subbasin Objective 1A9
Upper Columbia Subbasin Objective 1A
Upper Columbia Subbasin Objective 1A2
Upper Columbia Subbasin Objective 1A3
Upper Columbia Subbasin Objective 1A4
Upper Columbia Subbasin Objective 1A6
Upper Columbia Subbasin Objective 1A8
Upper Columbia Subbasin Objective 1A9
Metrics
* # of acres of new purchase/easement: Approximately 1500 acres per year
Produce Environmental Compliance Documentation Produce Environmental Compliance Documentation Complete the Environmental Compliance for all new lands to be purchased. 10/1/2006 9/30/2009 $10,200
Biological objectives
Support Work Element
Metrics
Conduct Pre-Acquisition Activities Conduct Pre-acquisition activities on potential new wildlife lands. Activities include list of potential properties for purchase, maps, legal descriptions, title status reports, land appraisals, environmental land audit, Tribal Resolution to purchase, HU letters, buyer/seller agreements, and etc. 10/1/2006 9/30/2009 $255,000
Biological objectives
Spokane Subbasin Objective 1A
Upper Columbia Subbasin Objective 1A
Metrics
Coordination General Project Coordination Activities include meetings, phone calls, and other communication tasks with funding agency, partners and cooperators. 10/1/2006 9/30/2009 $10,200
Biological objectives
Support Work Element
Metrics
Manage and Administer Projects Manage and Administer Project Project management include preparing Statement of Work, June & September Accrual estimates, manage budget and provide information to BPA and NWPCC as requested 10/1/2006 9/30/2009 $10,200
Biological objectives
Support Work Element
Metrics
Produce/Submit Scientific Findings Report Annual Progress/HEP Report The Annual Progress/HEP Report describes all pertinent yearly activities, successes, problems, and opportunities encountered and may include photos, as well as, giving the final HU crediting results that BPA will receive for protection of property through fee title acquisition 10/1/2006 9/30/2009 $17,000
Biological objectives
Support Work Element
Metrics
Produce/Submit Scientific Findings Report Produce Pisces Reports Prepare 4 quarterly Pisces reports against each identified milestone, indicating whether the milestone is green, yellow, or red. 10/1/2006 9/30/2009 $3,400
Biological objectives
Support Work Element
Metrics
Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data Conduct HEP surveys on newly acquired Wildlife lands. Work in conjunction with Regional HEP Team on habitat data collection for HU crediting to BPA. 10/1/2006 9/30/2009 $34,000
Biological objectives
Spokane Subbasin Objective 1A
Upper Columbia Subbasin Objective 1A
Metrics
Primary R, M, and E Type: Collect HEP data for BPA protection crediting

Section 8. Budgets

Itemized estimated budget
ItemNoteFY07FY08FY09
Personnel Two (2) .25 FTE's $21,472 $22,117 $22,781
Fringe Benefits [blank] $5,261 $5,419 $5,582
Supplies Supplies, enviro. testing, contracted services $66,804 $68,808 $70,872
Overhead Indirect rate of 17.6% $16,463 $16,956 $17,465
Capital Equipment Land acquisition funding $2,250,000 $2,250,000 $2,250,000
Totals $2,360,000 $2,363,300 $2,366,700
Total estimated FY 2007-2009 budgets
Total itemized budget: $7,090,000
Total work element budget: $7,090,000
Cost sharing
Funding source/orgItem or service providedFY 07 est value ($)FY 08 est value ($)FY 09 est value ($)Cash or in-kind?Status
Totals $0 $0 $0

Section 9. Project future

FY 2010 estimated budget: $0
FY 2011 estimated budget: $0
Comments: At this time is is expected that the Spokane Tribe may complete mitigation for construction and inundation losses at Grand Coulee if FY07-09 are funded completely.

Future O&M costs: O&M cost for future years is addressed in Project # 1998-00-300.

Termination date: Unknown
Comments: Project will terminate when the Spokane Tribe has acquire 100% of the HU losses for construction and inundation of Grand Coulee Dam.

Final deliverables:

Section 10. Narrative and other documents

ISRP COMMENT RESPONSE - 1991-062-00 Jul 2006

Reviews and recommendations

FY07 budget FY08 budget FY09 budget Total budget Type Category Recommendation
NPCC FINAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Oct 23, 2006) [full Council recs]
$2,250,000 $2,250,000 $2,250,000 $6,750,000 Capital ProvinceCapital Fund
NPCC FINAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Oct 23, 2006) [full Council recs]
$110,000 $113,300 $116,700 $340,000 Expense ProvinceExpense Fund
NPCC DRAFT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Sep 15, 2006) [full Council recs]
$110,000 $113,300 $116,700 $0 ProvinceExpense
Comments: Expense portion of project. See capital budget for capital recommendation.
NPCC DRAFT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Sep 15, 2006) [full Council recs]
$2,250,000 $2,250,000 $2,250,000 $0 ProvinceCapital

ISRP PRELIMINARY REVIEW (Jun 2, 2006)

Recommendation: Response requested

NPCC comments: This proposal fails to present evidence of the effectiveness of past purchases and similarly fails to adequately describe how purchases will be prioritized. The priorities appear to be simply repeated from the subbasin plan, with little description of the process that was used to prioritize purchases. The ISRP requests a response describing the prioritization process and to justifying the land purchases. Additionally, the ISRP requests a description of the success of past purchases (i.e., an evaluation of project success), a reasonable expectation for a program with a long history of funding.


ISRP FINAL REVIEW (Aug 31, 2006)

Recommendation: Fundable

NPCC comments: The response states the criteria that are used to prioritize purchases and these criteria should provide useful evaluation of possible acquisitions. Thus, the acquisition component of the project is justified. The response to the request to provide evaluation of project success is not adequate, as it does not address the project's ultimate biological objectives. Instead, it simply provides a task completion summary of amount of mitigation in terms of HU acquired relative to assessed HU losses. This does not provide relevant information for the ISRP's scientific review charge. See comments under the companion O&M project 199800300.