FY07-09 proposal 200711400

Jump to Reviews and Recommendations

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleVulcan Mountain Weed Control for Mule Deer and Bighorn Sheep Habitat Improvement
Proposal ID200711400
OrganizationWashington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW)
Short descriptionThis project will eliminate invasive noxious weeds, including hoary alyssum, spotted and diffuse knapweed, and musk thistle, from 1,500 acres of privately-owned mule deer winter and spring range and bighorn sheep habitat in the Upper Columbia Subbasin.
Information transferFinal project report
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Contacts
ContactOrganizationEmail
Form submitter
Sandy Dotts Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife dottssrd@dfw.wa.gov
All assigned contacts
Sandy Dotts Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife dottssrd@dfw.wa.gov

Section 2. Locations

Province / subbasin: Intermountain / Columbia Upper

LatitudeLongitudeWaterbodyDescription
Vulcan Mountain, north of Kettle River, Upper Columbia Subbasin

Section 3. Focal species

primary: All Wildlife
secondary: All Wildlife
Additional: Mule deer and bighorn sheep

Section 4. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishments

Section 5. Relationships to other projects

Funding sourceRelated IDRelated titleRelationship
[Funding Source left blank] [no entry] various This project complements and furthers efforts by WDFW, Ferry County Weed Board, Colville National Forest, Bureau of Land Management, private landowners, and conservation groups (i.e., Safari Club International, Inland Northwest Wildlife Council, Federation for North American Wild Sheep) to cooperatively implement numerous mule deer/bighorn sheep habitat improvement projects in the Vulcan Mountain area in recent years. These projects have included broad range weed control, selective logging, prescribed burning, forage plant seeding, water source development, and livestock fencing. Vulcan Mountain is also a focal area of the BPA-funded Cooperative Mule Deer Project (Nos. 200103400, 21023), which assessed mule deer population decline in the Intermountain Province and the role of forage quality in mule deer physical habitat condition.

Section 6. Biological objectives

Biological objectivesFull descriptionAssociated subbasin planStrategy
Increase quality of mule deer habitat Increase the quality of high priority mule deer winter and spring range and bighorn sheep habitat by 1,500 acres on Vulcan Mountain in the Upper Columbia Subbasin by 2009. Intermountain Subbasin Objective 2B2: Increase quantity and quality of mule deer habitats, particularly winter and spring ranges. Strategy a: Secure, protect, and enhance winter and spring ranges.
Increase quality of mule deer habitat Increase the quality of high priority mule deer winter and spring range and bighorn sheep habitat by 1,500 acres on Vulcan Mountain in the Upper Columbia Subbasin by 2009. Intermountain Subbasin Objective 2B2 - Strategy b: Restore grasses and forbs where noxious weeds have impacted mule deer habitat.
Increase quality of mule deer habitat Increase the quality of high priority mule deer winter and spring range and bighorn sheep habitat by 1,500 acres on Vulcan Mountain in the Upper Columbia Subbasin by 2009. Intermountain Subbasin Objective 2B1: Identify, maintain, restore, and enhance priority habitats (wetlands, riparian area, upland forests, steppe and shrub-steppe, cliffs and rock outcrops, caves, grasslands, and other priority habitats)...
Increase quality of mule deer habitat Increase the quality of high priority mule deer winter and spring range and bighorn sheep habitat by 1,500 acres on Vulcan Mountain in the Upper Columbia Subbasin by 2009. Intermountain Subbasin Objective 2B1 - Strategy c: Eliminate or reduce undesirable invasive vegetation.

Section 7. Work elements (coming back to this)

Work element nameWork element titleDescriptionStart dateEnd dateEst budget
Produce Environmental Compliance Documentation Produce environmental complicance documents WDFW will prepare all documents necessary to obtain environmental compliance from BPA (e.g., NEPA checklists, Biological Assessments, cultural resource assessments) and will work with Ferry County Weed Board to secure all other necessary federal, state and local permits/permissions. 12/1/2006 6/1/2007 $1,752
Biological objectives
Increase quality of mule deer habitat
Metrics
Remove vegetation Remove vegetation WDFW will subcontract to the Ferry County Weed Board to eliminate and reduce non-native invasive noxious weeds, including hoary alyssum, spotted and diffuse knapweed, and musk thistle, from 1,500 acres of privately-owned mule deer winter and spring range and bighorn sheep habitat on Vulcan Mountain (Figure A). A mixture of picloram (Tordon), 2,4-Dichloro-phenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), and a surfactant will be applied aerially (fixed wing aircraft or helicopter) or manually (backpack, ATV, truck boom) by State of Washington licensed applicators. 5/1/2007 9/1/2009 $77,334
Biological objectives
Increase quality of mule deer habitat
Metrics
* # of acres treated: 1,500
Other Produce annual progress reports WDFW will provide annually to BPA progress reports that describes accomplishments for each work element in the contract. 10/1/2007 9/30/2009 $5,256
Biological objectives
Increase quality of mule deer habitat
Metrics
Coordination Coordination WDFW will coordinate with private landowners within the project area and gain permission (through a cooperative agreement) to conduct project. WDFW will coordinate with the Ferry County Weed Board to implement on-the-ground work. 12/1/2006 9/30/2009 $5,256
Biological objectives
Increase quality of mule deer habitat
Metrics
Manage and Administer Projects Manage and administer project WDFW will administer project contract with BPA and support programmatic requirements such as metric reporting, financial reporting, etc. WDFW will administer a subcontract with the Ferry County Weed Board. This project will be tracked using WDFW’s computerized Contracts and Projects System database. 12/1/2006 9/30/2009 $5,256
Biological objectives
Increase quality of mule deer habitat
Metrics
Outreach and Education Outreach and Education WDFW, in coordination with the Ferry County Weed Board, will communicate with landowners within the project area about the project and why it is important. Outreach will include development of a newsletter/brochure and individual personal contacts with landowners in the project area. 3/1/2007 9/1/2009 $8,040
Biological objectives
Increase quality of mule deer habitat
Metrics
* # of general public reached: 50-75

Section 8. Budgets

Itemized estimated budget
ItemNoteFY07FY08FY09
Personnel [blank] $5,271 $4,217 $4,217
Fringe Benefits [blank] $1,525 $1,220 $1,220
Supplies Outreach materials, postage, phone $500 $500 $500
Travel [blank] $220 $220 $220
Other Subcontract with Ferry County Weed Board $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
Overhead 28.89% $7,949 $7,557 $7,557
Totals $35,464 $33,712 $33,712
Total estimated FY 2007-2009 budgets
Total itemized budget: $102,888
Total work element budget: $102,892
Cost sharing
Funding source/orgItem or service providedFY 07 est value ($)FY 08 est value ($)FY 09 est value ($)Cash or in-kind?Status
Totals $0 $0 $0

Section 9. Project future

FY 2010 estimated budget: $0
FY 2011 estimated budget: $0
Comments:

Future O&M costs:

Termination date: 9/30/2009
Comments:

Final deliverables: Final project summary report

Section 10. Narrative and other documents


Reviews and recommendations

FY07 budget FY08 budget FY09 budget Total budget Type Category Recommendation
NPCC FINAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Oct 23, 2006) [full Council recs]
$0 $0 $0 $0 Expense ProvinceExpense Do Not Fund
NPCC DRAFT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Sep 15, 2006) [full Council recs]
$0 $0 $0 $0 ProvinceExpense

ISRP PRELIMINARY REVIEW (Jun 2, 2006)

Recommendation: Not fundable

NPCC comments: This new proposal calls for the aerial herbicide treatment of 1500 acres on private land. This treatment could remove all the broadleaf plants on these acres. The proposal doesn't establish that this is valuable range, or that the broadleaf plants need to be controlled. There is no quantitative description of the weeds and monitoring is not adequately described. Thus, there is no apparent way to assess the value of the project. There is no description of Integrated Pest Management. The project proposed does not seem to be the best management practice.


ISRP FINAL REVIEW (Aug 31, 2006)

Recommendation: Not fundable

NPCC comments: This new proposal calls for the aerial herbicide treatment of 1500 acres on private land. This treatment could remove all the broadleaf plants on these acres. The proposal doesn't establish that this is valuable range, or that the broadleaf plants need to be controlled. There is no quantitative description of the weeds and monitoring is not adequately described. Thus, there is no apparent way to assess the value of the project. There is no description of Integrated Pest Management. The project proposed does not seem to be the best management practice.