FY07-09 proposal 200716200
Jump to Reviews and Recommendations
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Kalispel Tribe Fish and Wildlife Coordination |
| Proposal ID | 200716200 |
| Organization | Kalispel Tribe |
| Short description | Participate in regional mitigation activities in implementation of the Fish and Wildlife Program and BPA's role in funding the Fish and Wildlife Program. |
| Information transfer | This project will help coordinate activities that the Kalispel Tribe is involved with. |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Contacts
| Contact | Organization | |
|---|---|---|
| Form submitter | ||
| Joe Maroney | Kalispel Tribe of Indians | jmaroney@knrd.org |
| All assigned contacts | ||
| Ray D. Entz | Kalispel Tribe | rentz@knrd.org |
| Joe Maroney | Kalispel Tribe of Indians | jmaroney@knrd.org |
| Joe Maroney | Kalispel Tribe of Indians | jmaroney@knrd.org |
| Joe Maroney | Kalispel Tribe of Indians | jmaroney@knrd.org |
Section 2. Locations
Province / subbasin: Mainstem/Systemwide / Systemwide
| Latitude | Longitude | Waterbody | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
Section 3. Focal species
primary: All Wildlifesecondary: All Resident Fish
Additional: All wildlife species
Section 4. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishments |
|---|
Section 5. Relationships to other projects
| Funding source | Related ID | Related title | Relationship |
|---|---|---|---|
| BPA | [no entry] | [Related Project Title left blank] | All projects in the Fish and Wildlife Program |
| BPA | 199206100 | Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation | Kalispel Tribe wildlife project |
| BPA | 199106000 | Pend Oreille Wetlands Acquisition | Kalispel Tribe wildlife project |
| BPA | 199500100 | Kalispel Tribe Resident Fish Project | Kalispel Tribe fisheries project |
| BPA | 199700400 | Resident Fish Above Chief Joe | Kalispel Tribe fisheries project |
| BPA | 200107400 | Nppc Regional Data Needs | Participitation in this project |
| PCSRF - WSRFB | 00-1670 | Middle Branch Le Clerc Creek | Kalispel Tribe cost share |
| PCSRF - WSRFB | 00-1671 | East Branch LeClerc Rd | Kalispel Tribe sponsored project |
| PCSRF - WSRFB | 01-1306 | Pend Oreille Barrier Survey | Kalispel Tribe co-sponsor |
| PCSRF - WSRFB | 01-1405 | Willow Creek Aquatic Restoration | Kalispel Tribe sponsored project |
| PCSRF - WSRFB | 04-1372 | Cedar Creek Fish Passage Restoration | Kalispel Tribe cost share |
| PCSRF - WSRFB | 04-1373 | Indian Creek Diversion Screening | Kalispel Tribe cost share |
Section 6. Biological objectives
| Biological objectives | Full description | Associated subbasin plan | Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regional coordination | Coordinate activities of the Kalispel Tribe with other Fish and Wildlife managers, CBFWA, BPA, and the NPCC consistent with the Intermountain Province Subbasin Plans, 2000 Fish and Wildlife Program and the Northwest Power Act. | None | N/A |
Section 7. Work elements (coming back to this)
| Work element name | Work element title | Description | Start date | End date | Est budget |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coordination | Participate in Regional Fish and Wildlife Activities | Participate in regional mitigation activities to implement the Fish and Wildlife Program. This will include coordinating HEP team schedule and work assignments, policy analysis, etc... | 2/1/2007 | 1/31/2010 | $124,300 |
|
Biological objectives Regional coordination |
Metrics |
||||
| Outreach and Education | Provide information to regional entities on Kalispel Tribal policies and programs | Provide for discussion and information exchange with regional fish and wildlife managers, BPA and the NPCC on Kalispel Tribal policies, programs, and projects. | 2/1/2007 | 1/31/2010 | $90,000 |
|
Biological objectives Regional coordination |
Metrics * # of general public reached: 8 NPCC council members and staff * # of general public reached: BPA staff * # of general public reached: 18 fish and wildlife management agencies & tribes |
||||
| Produce Plan | Assist regional fish and wildlife managers with completion of regional reporting | Assist CBFWA with annual work plan and program wide implementation reporting | 2/1/2007 | 1/31/2010 | $15,000 |
|
Biological objectives Regional coordination |
Metrics |
||||
| Provide Technical Review | Assist regional fish and wildlife managers with technical review of projects and programs | Provide regional review of project for funding consideration (provincial reviews), funding adjustments (BOG) and reallocation of Fish and wildilfe Program funding. | 2/1/2007 | 1/31/2010 | $50,000 |
|
Biological objectives Regional coordination |
Metrics |
||||
Section 8. Budgets
Itemized estimated budget
| Item | Note | FY07 | FY08 | FY09 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travel | [blank] | $10,000 | $10,000 | $10,000 |
| Personnel | .7 FTE | $50,000 | $52,000 | $54,000 |
| Fringe Benefits | 30% | $15,000 | $15,600 | $16,200 |
| Overhead | about 20% | $15,000 | $15,500 | $16,000 |
| Totals | $90,000 | $93,100 | $96,200 | |
Total estimated FY 2007-2009 budgets
| Total itemized budget: | $279,300 |
| Total work element budget: | $279,300 |
Cost sharing
| Funding source/org | Item or service provided | FY 07 est value ($) | FY 08 est value ($) | FY 09 est value ($) | Cash or in-kind? | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Totals | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Section 9. Project future
|
FY 2010 estimated budget: $99,000 FY 2011 estimated budget: $99,000 |
Comments: Coordination crucial to Kalsipel tribe's success in meeting partial mitigation for Federal Hydropower impacts to fish and wildlife. |
Future O&M costs: N/A
Termination date: 2084
Comments: Program coordination is necessary and will continue until the decomissioning of Grand Coulee Dam or when full mitigation is achieved.
Final deliverables: Annual reporting and pisces status reporting
Section 10. Narrative and other documents
Reviews and recommendations
| FY07 budget | FY08 budget | FY09 budget | Total budget | Type | Category | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPCC FINAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Oct 23, 2006) [full Council recs] | ||||||
| $65,000 | $65,000 | $65,000 | $0 | Expense | Basinwide | Under Review |
| NPCC DRAFT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Sep 15, 2006) [full Council recs] | ||||||
| $93,100 | $93,100 | $93,100 | $0 | Basinwide | ||
ISRP PRELIMINARY REVIEW (Jun 2, 2006)
Recommendation: Admin (see comments)
NPCC comments: This is an inadequately written proposal to perform coordination and meeting participation. The proposal provides little explanation of how the requested FTE support and other funds will be spent. Budget figures are rounded and seem excessive (e.g. .7 FTE for coordination; $10,000 to attend regional meetings). The proposal does not justify why the efforts described in this proposal, which would seem to be routine and to require minimal effort, are not a component of the eight funded Kalispel projects, or how conservation and management will be affected if the funding is not provided. This proposal and a twin proposal submitted by the Spokane Tribe would seem to be covered under the more comprehensive (and less expensive) UCUT coordination proposal, which includes the Spokane and Kalispel. The justification for the proposal is based in the need for regional cooperation, the MOU between BPA and the Upper Columbia United Tribes regarding consultation, coordination and participation, and the withdrawal of the Kalispel Tribe from CBFWA. The proposal does not provide specific explanation of the Tribe’s withdrawal from CBFWA. The proposal has a single objective of coordinating the Kalispel tribe fish and wildlife projects with the region. Four work elements are generally explained as participation in meetings, exchanging information, providing Kalispel information to regional reporting, and providing information to regional entities on Kalispel policies, programs and projects. Coordination is not specifically tied to improvements of fish and wildlife conservation and restoration on Kalispel lands.
ISRP FINAL REVIEW (Aug 31, 2006)
Recommendation: Admin (see comments)
NPCC comments: This is an inadequately written proposal to perform coordination and meeting participation. The proposal provides little explanation of how the requested FTE support and other funds will be spent. Budget figures are rounded and seem excessive (e.g. .7 FTE for coordination; $10,000 to attend regional meetings). The proposal does not justify why the efforts described in this proposal, which would seem to be routine and to require minimal effort, are not a component of the eight funded Kalispel projects, or how conservation and management will be affected if the funding is not provided. This proposal and a twin proposal submitted by the Spokane Tribe would seem to be covered under the more comprehensive (and less expensive) UCUT coordination proposal, which includes the Spokane and Kalispel. The justification for the proposal is based in the need for regional cooperation, the MOU between BPA and the Upper Columbia United Tribes regarding consultation, coordination and participation, and the withdrawal of the Kalispel Tribe from CBFWA. The proposal does not provide specific explanation of the Tribe’s withdrawal from CBFWA. The proposal has a single objective of coordinating the Kalispel tribe fish and wildlife projects with the region. Four work elements are generally explained as participation in meetings, exchanging information, providing Kalispel information to regional reporting, and providing information to regional entities on Kalispel policies, programs and projects. Coordination is not specifically tied to improvements of fish and wildlife conservation and restoration on Kalispel lands.