FY07-09 proposal 200721900

Jump to Reviews and Recommendations

Section 1. Administrative

Contacts

Section 2. Locations

Province / subbasin: Lower Columbia / Willamette

Section 3. Focal species

Section 4. Past accomplishments

Section 5. Relationships to other projects

Section 6. Biological objectives

Section 7. Work elements (coming back to this)

Section 8. Budgets

Itemized estimated budget

Total estimated FY 2007-2009 budgets

Cost sharing

Section 9. Project future

Future O&M costs:

Termination date:
Comments:

Final deliverables: The second highest priority fish passage barrier identified in Clear Creek in the Clackamas Watershed is removed.

Section 10. Narrative and other documents

Reviews and recommendations

ISRP PRELIMINARY REVIEW (Jun 2, 2006)

Recommendation: Fundable (Qualified)

NPCC comments: This proposal is set in an area important to the recently listed Lower Columbia River (LCR) Coho ESU as well as to the LCR steelhead ESU and the LCR Chinook ESU. The proposal describes an opportunity to work with a willing landowner to fix a passage barrier on Clear Creek, a priority restoration target in the Willamette Subbasin Plan, the Clackamas River Basin Action Plan, and to general measures of the Fish and Wildlife Program, which will allow access to 16 miles of high quality habitat once removed. According to the Willamette Subbasin plan, the Clackamas is one of the last bastions of listed lower Columbia River coho salmon. The Clackamas lower river tributaries have considerable potential to add habitat and refugia for all anadromous fish populations in the Basin. These are habitat factors that are lacking in the heavily urbanized lower Willamette River. Obstructions (culverts) are key limiting factors in the Clear Creek tributary. Addressing key fish passage barriers in these tributaries will provide access to refugia, spawning and rearing habitat for Lower Columbia River ESU Coho and Winter steelhead. It is important to provide unrestricted access to this higher quality habitat that has lower temperatures, better riparian buffers, better spawning habitat, and better rearing habitat. The proposal has been exceptionally well done for a simple passage barrier removal project. Three objectives are measurable and specific; although not further explained in this section, they are consistent with discussions in an earlier section. Methods to develop a passage restoration plan are brief but adequate. Full marks are given for specifying a clear-span bridge; however, a more detailed explanation of the methods for replacing the ford with a bridge, and for monitoring would improve the proposal. The monitoring and evaluation is the weakest part of the proposal but Objective 3 and associated Task 3a indicate that post project monitoring for project evaluation will be done (snorkeling surveys). The proposal is put into the context of other Clear Creek projects being conducted through collaborations of Clackamas River Basin Council, ODFW, OWEB, OWHF, METRO, PGE and landowners. A number of habitat improvement projects are being undertaken. Information transfer is well described and a variety of avenues (Clackamas River Basin Council website, school tours, workshops, etc.) will be employed to publicize this project. Benefits from this project should persist for a long time for the focal species, coho and winter steelhead. Other species will likely receive long-term benefits from reconnected habitat.

ISRP FINAL REVIEW (Aug 31, 2006)

Recommendation: Fundable (Qualified)

NPCC comments: This proposal is set in an area important to the recently listed Lower Columbia River (LCR) Coho ESU as well as to the LCR steelhead ESU and the LCR Chinook ESU. The proposal describes an opportunity to work with a willing landowner to fix a passage barrier on Clear Creek, a priority restoration target in the Willamette Subbasin Plan, the Clackamas River Basin Action Plan, and to general measures of the Fish and Wildlife Program, which will allow access to 16 miles of high quality habitat once removed. According to the Willamette Subbasin plan, the Clackamas is one of the last bastions of listed lower Columbia River coho salmon. The Clackamas lower river tributaries have considerable potential to add habitat and refugia for all anadromous fish populations in the Basin. These are habitat factors that are lacking in the heavily urbanized lower Willamette River. Obstructions (culverts) are key limiting factors in the Clear Creek tributary. Addressing key fish passage barriers in these tributaries will provide access to refugia, spawning and rearing habitat for Lower Columbia River ESU Coho and Winter steelhead. It is important to provide unrestricted access to this higher quality habitat that has lower temperatures, better riparian buffers, better spawning habitat, and better rearing habitat. The proposal has been exceptionally well done for a simple passage barrier removal project. Three objectives are measurable and specific; although not further explained in this section, they are consistent with discussions in an earlier section. Methods to develop a passage restoration plan are brief but adequate. Full marks are given for specifying a clear-span bridge; however, a more detailed explanation of the methods for replacing the ford with a bridge, and for monitoring would improve the proposal. The monitoring and evaluation is the weakest part of the proposal but Objective 3 and associated Task 3a indicate that post project monitoring for project evaluation will be done (snorkeling surveys). The proposal is put into the context of other Clear Creek projects being conducted through collaborations of Clackamas River Basin Council, ODFW, OWEB, OWHF, METRO, PGE and landowners. A number of habitat improvement projects are being undertaken. Information transfer is well described and a variety of avenues (Clackamas River Basin Council website, school tours, workshops, etc.) will be employed to publicize this project. Benefits from this project should persist for a long time for the focal species, coho and winter steelhead. Other species will likely receive long-term benefits from reconnected habitat.