FY07-09 proposal 200727100

Jump to Reviews and Recommendations

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleWillamette Basin Capitalized Wildlife Land Acquisitions
Proposal ID200727100
OrganizationThe Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde
Short descriptionThe Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde would contract with the BPA to acquire 650 wildlife habitat units in the Willamette Subbasin at a fixed price range.
Information transferThe process of acquiring, managing, and monitoring lands for habitat units would generate numerous reports, documents and other forms of data. Annual reports and management plans would be distributed to the BPA annually. This proposal represents a unique and innovative way of acquiring habitat units under this program. The information gathered during this program could be useful to others and could be shared with other interested parties at the Tribe's and BPA's discretion.
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Contacts
ContactOrganizationEmail
Form submitter
Kelly Dirksen The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde kelly.dirksen@grandronde.org
All assigned contacts
Jeff Baker The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde jeff.baker@grandronde.org
Kelly Dirksen The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde kelly.dirksen@grandronde.org
Kelly Dirksen The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde kelly.dirksen@grandronde.org

Section 2. Locations

Province / subbasin: Lower Columbia / Willamette

LatitudeLongitudeWaterbodyDescription
Willamette The Willamette Subbasin.

Section 3. Focal species

primary: All Wildlife
secondary: All Wildlife
Additional:

Section 4. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishments

Section 5. Relationships to other projects

Funding sourceRelated IDRelated titleRelationship

Section 6. Biological objectives

Biological objectivesFull descriptionAssociated subbasin planStrategy
Terrestrial Biological Objectives The overall objective is to increase population trends of focal species, especially those listed under the Endangered Species Act, and the quantity and quality of connected habitats on which they depend. Willamette -Restore processes the maintain watershed health. -Connect favorable habitats

Section 7. Work elements (coming back to this)

Work element nameWork element titleDescriptionStart dateEnd dateEst budget
Land Purchase Purchase Land Transfer title and pay landowner 1/1/2007 12/31/2009 $7,031,500
Biological objectives
Terrestrial Biological Objectives
Metrics
# of HU's protected by land purchase or easement: 650
* # of acres of new purchase/easement: 1000
Produce Environmental Compliance Documentation NEPA and ESA Compliance The Tribe would complete initial NEPA and ESA compliance of new acquisitions 1/1/2007 12/31/2009 $25,888
Biological objectives
Metrics
Maintain Vegetation Vegetation and weed management Maintain existing vegetation and control weeds. 1/1/2007 12/31/2009 $60,000
Biological objectives
Metrics
Operate and Maintain Habitat/Passage Maintenance and Repairs Maintain and repair property as necessary. May include roads, gates, fencing, drainage structures and other needs. 1/1/2007 12/31/2009 $60,000
Biological objectives
Metrics
Conduct Pre-Acquisition Activities Appraisal, survey, assessment Conduct appraisals, surveys, wetland assessments, and habitat assessements. 1/1/2007 12/31/2009 $228,000
Biological objectives
Metrics
Conduct Pre-Acquisition Activities Evaluate and locate acquisitions Fish and Wildlife Coordinator, Biologist, and Mitigation Specialist identify, evaluate, and review habitat acquisitions. Includes wage, fringe, indirect. 1/1/2007 12/31/2009 $188,153
Biological objectives
Metrics
Coordination Coordinate conultants, assessments, planning Wildlife Mitigation Specialist to coordinate planning, assessments, and consultants. Includes wage, fringe, indirect, computer, vehicle lease, and fuel. 1/1/2007 12/31/2009 $154,642
Biological objectives
Metrics
Produce Inventory or Assessment Habitat assessment and monitoring Assess, map, and monitor habitat conditions on new acquisitions. 1/1/2007 12/31/2009 $90,000
Biological objectives
Metrics
Produce Plan Management Planning Produce a plan to restore and manage habitat of new acquisitions. 1/1/2007 12/31/2009 $70,000
Biological objectives
Metrics

Section 8. Budgets

Itemized estimated budget
ItemNoteFY07FY08FY09
Personnel [blank] $54,975 $56,076 $57,196
Fringe Benefits [blank] $12,644 $12,896 $13,154
Capital Equipment land purchase $2,336,000 $2,345,500 $2,350,000
Other O&M Contracts $40,000 $95,000 $145,000
Other Pre-acquisition contracts $76,000 $76,000 $76,000
Supplies computer $2,000 $0 $0
Travel GSA vehicle and fuel $6,000 $6,000 $6,500
Overhead indirect costs $44,427 $46,605 $50,210
Totals $2,572,046 $2,638,077 $2,698,060
Total estimated FY 2007-2009 budgets
Total itemized budget: $7,908,183
Total work element budget: $7,908,183
Cost sharing
Funding source/orgItem or service providedFY 07 est value ($)FY 08 est value ($)FY 09 est value ($)Cash or in-kind?Status
Grand Ronde Personnel $23,642 $24,193 $24,599 In-Kind Confirmed
Totals $23,642 $24,193 $24,599

Section 9. Project future

FY 2010 estimated budget: $500,000
FY 2011 estimated budget: $500,000
Comments: [Outyear comment field left blank]

Future O&M costs: 1 FTE, maintenance, restoration- earthwork, weed control, veg establishment, site prep.

Termination date: 2037
Comments: for life of conservation easement

Final deliverables: benfits to wildlife impacted by federal hydropower system dams in the Willamette Subbasin and idntified in the Willamette Subbasin Plan. A minimum of 650 wildlife habitat units.

Section 10. Narrative and other documents


Reviews and recommendations

FY07 budget FY08 budget FY09 budget Total budget Type Category Recommendation
NPCC FINAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Oct 23, 2006) [full Council recs]
$0 $0 $0 $0 Capital ProvinceCapital Do Not Fund
NPCC DRAFT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Sep 15, 2006) [full Council recs]
$0 $0 $0 $0 ProvinceCapital

ISRP PRELIMINARY REVIEW (Jun 2, 2006)

Recommendation: Not fundable

NPCC comments: The Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon (Tribe) propose the acquisition of 880 acres of wildlife habitat in the Willamette River Subbasin to protect, restore, and manage focal habitats that have been identified in the Subbasin Plan. Planning is in the very early stages, and links to existing planning documents are only vaguely described. The Tribe might be better off to pre-select a subset of parcels, perhaps in collaboration with others, then develop a more specific proposal. Provision for future management, other than just continuing Program funding, would be more compelling. Discussion of anticipated restoration (if needed), maintenance, focal species to be managed for, and a monitoring and evaluation program should all be included for specific parcels when identified. Collaboration with complementary programs in the sub-basin is likely to improve overall conservation value due to the degree of fragmentation present. Monitoring, in terms of regular measurement of established indicators and comparison to desired conditions, followed by adaptive management, is not included in this proposal. The project's ability to "improve species trend..." is doubtful if there are no specific goals or monitoring of success relative to target species. Proposing to acquire a minimum number of Habitat Units from unspecified lands, at estimated prices, as is done here, could create an untenable commitment by the tribe and offers no obvious advantage over a more focused approach. Timelines are optimistic. The estimated cost per HU of $12,166 is considerably higher than similar proposals.


ISRP FINAL REVIEW (Aug 31, 2006)

Recommendation: Not fundable

NPCC comments: The Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon (Tribe) propose the acquisition of 880 acres of wildlife habitat in the Willamette River Subbasin to protect, restore, and manage focal habitats that have been identified in the Subbasin Plan. Planning is in the very early stages, and links to existing planning documents are only vaguely described. The Tribe might be better off to pre-select a subset of parcels, perhaps in collaboration with others, then develop a more specific proposal. Provision for future management, other than just continuing Program funding, would be more compelling. Discussion of anticipated restoration (if needed), maintenance, focal species to be managed for, and a monitoring and evaluation program should all be included for specific parcels when identified. Collaboration with complementary programs in the sub-basin is likely to improve overall conservation value due to the degree of fragmentation present. Monitoring, in terms of regular measurement of established indicators and comparison to desired conditions, followed by adaptive management, is not included in this proposal. The project's ability to "improve species trend..." is doubtful if there are no specific goals or monitoring of success relative to target species. Proposing to acquire a minimum number of Habitat Units from unspecified lands, at estimated prices, as is done here, could create an untenable commitment by the tribe and offers no obvious advantage over a more focused approach. Timelines are optimistic. The estimated cost per HU of $12,166 is considerably higher than similar proposals.