FY07-09 proposal 200729300

Jump to Reviews and Recommendations

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleUmatilla River Basin Stream Temperature Monitoring
Proposal ID200729300
OrganizationConfederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation
Short descriptionCTUIR Water Resources Program will monitor stream temperatures in the Umatilla River Basin at 31 long term monitoring sites.
Information transferRaw data and data summaries will be uploaded to an internet accessible database. Annual reports and data summaries will be provided to the CTUIR Fisheries Program for use in their Monitoring and Evaluation Program.
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Contacts
ContactOrganizationEmail
Form submitter
Robin Harris Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation robinharris@ctuir.com
All assigned contacts
Robin Harris Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation robinharris@ctuir.com

Section 2. Locations

Province / subbasin: Columbia Plateau / Umatilla

LatitudeLongitudeWaterbodyDescription
45.789 -119.310 stream Umatilla River at Maxwell Dam. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.790 -119.280 stream Umatilla River at Westland Dam. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.776 -119.223 stream Umatilla River at Stanfield Dam. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.650 -118.967 stream Umatilla River near Barnhart. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.649 -118.905 stream Umatilla River near Coombs Canyon. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.661 -118.860 stream Umatilla River near McKennon Station. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.667 -118.630 stream Umatilla River above Minthorn Springs. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.675 -118.593 stream Umatilla River 0.2 miles above Cayuse Bridge. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.692 -118.419 stream Umatilla River at Thornhollow. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.708 -118.350 stream Umatilla River lower Imeques. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.723 -118.315 stream Umatilla River above Ryan Creek. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.742 -118.244 stream Umatilla River below Forks. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.733 -118.140 stream North Fork Umatilla River below Coyote Creek. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.729 -118.115 stream North Fork Umatilla River at end of trail. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.782 -119.241 stream Umatilla River below Stanfield. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.658 -118.876 stream Umatilla River above Rieth Bridge. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.732 -118.264 stream Umatilla River at Bar M. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.708 -118.137 stream Buck Creek below Lake Creek. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.630 -119.431 stream Butter Creek near Pine City Gage at Bridge. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.499 -119.380 stream Butter Creek at USGS Gage. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.585 -118.314 stream Camp Creek in Meacham Creek Basin. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.668 -118.840 stream McKay Creek near mouth. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.512 -118.612 stream North Fork McKay Creek at mouth. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.647 -118.823 stream McKay Creek near Grade School. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.627 -118.812 stream McKay Creek at Heavens Lane. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.483 -118.267 stream East Fork Meacham Creek at mouth. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.526 -118.283 stream North Fork Meacham Creek. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.552 -118.311 stream Meacham Creek 2 miles below Camp Creek. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.570 -118.318 stream Meacham Creek above Duncan. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.680 -118.197 stream Thomas Creek near mouth. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.
45.831 -119.324 stream Umatilla River at Ponds. This location may change based on Fisheries Program input.

Section 3. Focal species

primary: All Anadromous Fish
secondary: All Resident Fish

Section 4. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishments

Section 5. Relationships to other projects

Funding sourceRelated IDRelated titleRelationship
BPA 199000501 Umatilla Basin Nat Prod M&E From 1993 to 2006, stream temperature monitoring was part of project #199000501, Umatilla River Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation Project. The CTUIR Fisheries Program approached the CTUIR Water Resources Program and requested the Water Resources Program take over the stream temperature monitoring portion of project #199000501 as it fits well with the Water Resources Program's comprehensive water quality monitoring plan.

Section 6. Biological objectives

Biological objectivesFull descriptionAssociated subbasin planStrategy
Natural Production Maintain and enhance natural production, productivity, abundance, life history characteristics and genetic diversity of fish and mussels throughout the Umatilla Basin using habitat protection and improvement. Umatilla Temperature is a key indicator of the effects of: 1) Maintenance of Phase I and II, and implementation of Phase III Umatilla Basin Projects. 2) Purchase water rights from willing sellers. 3) Increase water conservation and irrigation efficiency.
Population and Environmental Status Monitor the status and trends of fish and mussel populations, their habitats and ecosystems throughout the Umatilla Basin. Umatilla Temperature is a key indicator of the effects of: 1) Maintenance of Phase I and II, and implementation of Phase III Umatilla Basin Projects. 2) Purchase water rights from willing sellers. 3) Increase water conservation and irrigation efficiency.

Section 7. Work elements (coming back to this)

Work element nameWork element titleDescriptionStart dateEnd dateEst budget
Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data Field data collection Instrument QA/QC check and setup, thermograph deployment, mid-season thermograph audit, thermograph removal. Estimated cost includes personnel, fringe, vehicle, supplies, and indirect costs. 3/1/2007 12/31/2009 $47,196
Biological objectives
Natural Production
Population and Environmental Status
Metrics
Create/Manage/Maintain Database Database management Thermograph download, Upload data to internet accessible database. Estimated costs include personnel, fringe, and indirect costs. 3/1/2007 12/31/2009 $7,785
Biological objectives
Natural Production
Population and Environmental Status
Metrics
Analyze/Interpret Data Data analysis Quality check data using audit data, prepare data summaries and graphs. Estimated cost includes personnel, fringe, and indirect costs. 3/1/2007 12/31/2009 $11,005
Biological objectives
Natural Production
Population and Environmental Status
Metrics
Disseminate Raw/Summary Data and Results Annual reports Prepare annual reports and internal reports. Estimated cost includes personnel, fringe, and indirect costs. 3/1/2007 12/31/2009 $9,490
Biological objectives
Natural Production
Population and Environmental Status
Metrics

Section 8. Budgets

Itemized estimated budget
ItemNoteFY07FY08FY09
Personnel 0.20 FTE Water Quality Specialist, 0.06 FTE Water Quality Coordinator $11,015 $11,350 $11,690
Fringe Benefits 27% $2,974 $3,065 $3,156
Supplies 10 thermographs and casings per year at $140 each, 2008-2009 $0 $1,400 $1,400
Travel GSA vehicle, insurance $2,750 $2,750 $2,750
Overhead Indirect 39% $6,528 $7,240 $7,408
Totals $23,267 $25,805 $26,404
Total estimated FY 2007-2009 budgets
Total itemized budget: $75,476
Total work element budget: $75,476
Cost sharing
Funding source/orgItem or service providedFY 07 est value ($)FY 08 est value ($)FY 09 est value ($)Cash or in-kind?Status
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 11 thermographs in Umatilla Basin $4,400 $4,400 $4,400 In-Kind Under Development
Umatilla SWCD 8 thermographs in Umatilla Basin $3,200 $3,200 $3,200 In-Kind Confirmed
US Bureau of Reclamation 8 thermographs in Umatilla Basin $3,200 $3,200 $3,200 In-Kind Under Development
USFS, Umatilla National Forest NIST thermometer, yearly calibration $480 $120 $120 In-Kind Confirmed
USFS, Umatilla National Forest 8 thermographs in Umatilla basin $3,200 $3,200 $3,200 In-Kind Confirmed
Totals $14,480 $14,120 $14,120

Section 9. Project future

FY 2010 estimated budget: $27,017
FY 2011 estimated budget: $27,017
Comments: [Outyear comment field left blank]

Future O&M costs: none

Termination date: none
Comments: Stream temperature monitoring will continue to be an important element in salmonid restoration efforts. This project is a long-term monitoring project.

Final deliverables: Annual Reports, Final Report, Data accessible on website

Section 10. Narrative and other documents


Reviews and recommendations

FY07 budget FY08 budget FY09 budget Total budget Type Category Recommendation
NPCC FINAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Oct 23, 2006) [full Council recs]
$0 $0 $0 $0 Expense ProvinceExpense Do Not Fund
NPCC DRAFT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Sep 15, 2006) [full Council recs]
$0 $0 $0 $0 ProvinceExpense

ISRP PRELIMINARY REVIEW (Jun 2, 2006)

Recommendation: Fundable (Qualified)

NPCC comments: This modest project proposal is to secure 10 thermographs, the staff time to deploy them, and analyze data as part of a larger scale temperature monitoring project in the subbasin. Temperature is a key variable for watershed and habitat improvements in the subbasin. Elevated temperature is a described as limiting factor for fish (focal and non-focal species) productivity and survival. While this is a modest project that ties in directly with a broader subbasin temperature M&E project and funding will likely be ongoing as part of a long term monitoring need, the priority of these gauges is not clearly justified. The ISRP recommends the project sponsors better describe why these are the key locations for thermographs and how the information gained will address a key management activity. Also, what is the statistical design for placement of these gauges - especially the ten new gauges? What is the rationale for distribution of these gauges and the intensity of the sampling? Why the 58 in the places they are? The proposal would be improved by a reporting of the data collected from the existing 58 gauges. Specifically, it is not clear why so many monitoring sites are needed. Has there been an effort to compare records to see whether some sites might be omitted? The clustering of thermographs suggests that potential problem areas have been identified, but there is no discussion of this in the Narrative. The question is whether this placement is adequate for purposes that can be foreseen?


ISRP FINAL REVIEW (Aug 31, 2006)

Recommendation: Fundable (Qualified)

NPCC comments: This modest project proposal is to secure 10 thermographs, the staff time to deploy them, and analyze data as part of a larger scale temperature monitoring project in the subbasin. Temperature is a key variable for watershed and habitat improvements in the subbasin. Elevated temperature is a described as limiting factor for fish (focal and non-focal species) productivity and survival. While this is a modest project that ties in directly with a broader subbasin temperature M&E project and funding will likely be ongoing as part of a long term monitoring need, the priority of these gauges is not clearly justified. The ISRP recommends the project sponsors better describe why these are the key locations for thermographs and how the information gained will address a key management activity. Also, what is the statistical design for placement of these gauges - especially the ten new gauges? What is the rationale for distribution of these gauges and the intensity of the sampling? Why the 58 in the places they are? The proposal would be improved by a reporting of the data collected from the existing 58 gauges. Specifically, it is not clear why so many monitoring sites are needed. Has there been an effort to compare records to see whether some sites might be omitted? The clustering of thermographs suggests that potential problem areas have been identified, but there is no discussion of this in the Narrative. The question is whether this placement is adequate for purposes that can be foreseen? See ISRP comments on the “Umatilla Initiative” under proposal 198343600.