FY07-09 proposal 200733200

Jump to Reviews and Recommendations

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleMitigation of marine-derived nutrient loss in the Boise-Payette-Weiser subbasin.
Proposal ID200733200
OrganizationIdaho Department of Fish & Game
Short descriptionThe project replaces marine derived nutrients using salmon carcasses and salmon carcass analogs in the Boise-Payette-Weiser subbasins. Aquatic and terrestrial effects of nutrient treatements will be monitored using isotope and lipid analysis.
Information transferINformation from this project will be quantitative and qualitative. Data will be stored in annual reports, and private files. Data will be used to provide insight into the effects of mitigating marine nutrient losses on ecosystems where anadromous fish have been extirpated. Project analysis will be submitted for publication in peer reviewed journals.
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Contacts
ContactOrganizationEmail
Form submitter
Gregg Servheen Idaho Department of Fish and Game gservheen@idfg.idaho.gov
All assigned contacts

Section 2. Locations

Province / subbasin: Middle Snake / Payette

LatitudeLongitudeWaterbodyDescription
South Fork Payette River South Fork Payette Watershed

Section 3. Focal species

primary: Bull Trout
primary: Interior Redband Trout
primary: Mountain Whitefish
secondary: All Wildlife
Additional: bald eagle, mink, american dipper

Section 4. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishments

Section 5. Relationships to other projects

Funding sourceRelated IDRelated titleRelationship
BPA 200105500 Salmonid Response to Fertiliza The projects have similar goals in measuring the response of salmonids to nutrient enhancement. Methods are similar and our project uses carcass analogs developed under project ID 200105500
BPA 199800200 Snake River Native Salmonid As cooperative use of stream survey data

Section 6. Biological objectives

Biological objectivesFull descriptionAssociated subbasin planStrategy
Mitigate for the loss of marine derived nutrients Use anadromous fish carcasses, carcass analogs, liquid fertilizer to mitigate for the loss of marine nutrients caused by extirpation of salmon and steelhead from the subbasins due to development of the hydropower system Boise/Payette/Weiser Relevant strategies from the BPW Subbasin Plan are numbered as follows- 1A2, 2A2, 6E1 through 6e5, 18A2, Relevant strategies from the

Section 7. Work elements (coming back to this)

Work element nameWork element titleDescriptionStart dateEnd dateEst budget
Produce Environmental Compliance Documentation Complete NEPA analysis Complete NEPA analsysis 12/1/2006 5/1/2007 $15,000
Biological objectives
Metrics
Enhance Nutrients Instream Reintroduce nutrients to selected watersheds Seed selected treatment streams with carcasses, carcass analogs or fertilizer based on simulated historical abundance 6/1/2007 8/1/2009 $165,584
Biological objectives
Metrics
Identify and Select Projects Choose Treatment and control streams Identify treatment and control streams for nutrient enhancement 10/1/2006 1/1/2007 $4,500
Biological objectives
Mitigate for the loss of marine derived nutrients
Metrics
Analyze/Interpret Data Analyze and report results Analyze and interpret results including recomendations 12/1/2007 10/31/2009 $63,528
Biological objectives
Metrics
Primary R, M, and E Type: Action effectiveness research
Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data Determine effects of annual fertilization from nutrient enhancement Manipulative experiment to determine if low level annual fertilization of conifer seedlings and riparian plants using salmon carcasses and brikets has significant impacts on foliar nutrient levels. 6/1/2007 10/31/2009 $113,043
Biological objectives
Metrics
Primary R, M, and E Type: Action effectiveness resaerch
Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data Evaluate foliar N15 to assess historic inputs of marine derived nitrogen Sample foliage from bankside, adjacent upslope, and upslope mature/old growth conifers and evaluate patterns of foliar 15N to assess historic inputs of marine derived nitrogen. 6/1/2007 10/31/2009 $42,146
Biological objectives
Metrics
Primary R, M, and E Type: Action effectiveness research
Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data Measure marine nutrient inputs in components of aquatic food web Measure carbon 13 and nitrogen 15 isotopes in biofilm, invertebrates and fishes 6/1/2007 10/31/2009 $69,440
Biological objectives
Metrics
Primary R, M, and E Type: Action effectiveness monitoring
Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data Measure occurrence of N15 in captured species Measure occurrence of isotope of nitrogen (N15) in captured species. 7/1/2007 10/31/2009 $106,730
Biological objectives
Metrics
Primary R, M, and E Type: Action effectiveness
Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data Quantify and model the contribution of nitrogen within the terrestrial food chain Capture selected vertebrate speecis including avian (american dipper and kingfisher) and mammalian (mink, shrews, bats, small mammals) in treated and control areas. 6/1/2007 10/31/2009 $142,310
Biological objectives
Metrics
Primary R, M, and E Type: Action Effectiveness research
Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data Quantify contribution of nitrogen within the aquatic food chain Sample selected food web components (biofilm, invertebrates, fishes) in treated and control reaches 6/1/2007 10/31/2009 $188,830
Biological objectives
Metrics
Primary R, M, and E Type: Action effectiveness research
Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data Quantify productivity of aquatic ecosystem components Measure biofilm mass, chlorophyll-a, invertebrate densities and mass, and fish densities and mass 6/1/2007 10/31/2009 $131,942
Biological objectives
Metrics
Primary R, M, and E Type: Action Effectiveness Research
Disseminate Raw/Summary Data and Results Analyze and report results complete analysis of data, model contributions of nutrient enhancement to the terrestrial ecosystem 12/1/2007 10/31/2009 $35,577
Biological objectives
Metrics

Section 8. Budgets

Itemized estimated budget
ItemNoteFY07FY08FY09
Personnel 3 graduate students, 1 technician 3 biological aides, .77 yr Principal investigator $159,977 $163,177 $166,440
Fringe Benefits [blank] $36,918 $37,657 $38,410
Supplies sampling and analysis supplies $43,606 $44,478 $45,368
Travel [blank] $40,960 $43,804 $44,904
Overhead overhead $69,576 $70,968 $72,387
Totals $351,037 $360,084 $367,509
Total estimated FY 2007-2009 budgets
Total itemized budget: $1,078,630
Total work element budget: $1,078,630
Cost sharing
Funding source/orgItem or service providedFY 07 est value ($)FY 08 est value ($)FY 09 est value ($)Cash or in-kind?Status
Totals $0 $0 $0

Section 9. Project future

FY 2010 estimated budget: $0
FY 2011 estimated budget: $0
Comments: unknownq

Future O&M costs: Future project cost will be based on desired implementation strategy determined from this study.

Termination date:
Comments:

Final deliverables:

Section 10. Narrative and other documents

response to isrp 2006 review FINAL.doc Jul 2006

Reviews and recommendations

FY07 budget FY08 budget FY09 budget Total budget Type Category Recommendation
NPCC FINAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Oct 23, 2006) [full Council recs]
$352,213 $361,260 $368,685 $1,082,158 Expense ProvinceExpense Fund
NPCC DRAFT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Sep 15, 2006) [full Council recs]
$352,213 $361,260 $368,685 $0 ProvinceExpense
Comments: Bonneville preliminary designation of "in lieu". See issue memo
NPCC DRAFT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Sep 15, 2006) [full Council recs]
$0 $0 $0 $0 Basinwide

ISRP PRELIMINARY REVIEW (Jun 2, 2006)

Recommendation: Response requested

NPCC comments: This is a basic research project with implications to similar high elevation headwater areas. The project could provide additional information on trophic chains from salmon carcasses. The proposal relates this work to objectives in the subbasin plan and other regional programs. The proposal does not directly relate the work to other projects with BPA funding. Collaboration with IDFG, U.S. Forest Service, and Idaho Power Company are noted. Justification should be provided to demonstrate that this work is still needed in spite of other research recently published and currently underway in Columbia River Basin. Does this project address uncertainties or is it designed to try an approach that has already been tested elsewhere? Consideration of long-term management applications also should be included in a response. A response is needed to provide additional information on the experimental design. The response should provide details that indicate appropriate sites are available and that the sample sizes are adequate for detecting meaningful differences between treatment and control sites, before and after treatments, and between treatment levels. Sponsors are requested to address not only statistical significance but also whether sufficient data will be available to detect meaningful biological effects. Also clarification is needed concerning whether baseline data would be collected for all variables of interest before treatments are applied. The personnel are well qualified. Plans for information transfer include publication in peer-reviewed journals, but efforts to share lessons learned and successful results to others in the region on a more timely basis should be identified.


ISRP FINAL REVIEW (Aug 31, 2006)

Recommendation: Fundable

NPCC comments: This is a basic research project with implications to similar high elevation headwater areas. The project should generate new knowledge on trophic chains from salmon carcasses. This is a well-thought out and unique proposal that has a high likelihood of providing new and immediately useful information for both the research and management communities. The proposal relates this work to objectives in the subbasin plan and other regional programs. The proposal does not directly relate the work to other projects with BPA funding. Collaboration with IDFG, U.S. Forest Service, and Idaho Power Company are noted. The personnel are well qualified. The project reflects a nice mix of personnel from the management agency (IDFG) and from the academic community. Plans for information transfer include publication in peer-reviewed journals, but efforts to share lessons learned and successful results to others in the region on a timelier basis should be identified. The sponsors responded very effectively to ISRP questions about how this work differs from other recent work and provided justification that this work is still needed. The work would be done in a set of conditions (blocked area, nutrient-poor batholith, and bull trout) that differ significantly from those of ongoing nutrient addition evaluations. The response indicates that enough study sites are available, but the sample size question was not completely addressed. Instead, other studies where statistically significant results were obtained were cited. Before fieldwork is implemented the sponsors should conduct a sample size/power analysis to ensure that an adequate number of sites will be sampled to have a high probability of detecting biologically meaningful treatment differences.