FY07-09 proposal 200725400
Jump to Reviews and Recommendations
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | StreamNet Support and Services for Conservation and Recovery Data Needs |
| Proposal ID | 200725400 |
| Organization | Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission (PSMFC) |
| Short description | StreamNet will collaborate with CSMEP, aka CBFWA Monitor/Eval Program, (Project# 2003-036-00) to provide data management and application development needed to support fish population monitoring efforts by CSMEP. |
| Information transfer | StreamNet exists specifically to facilitate transfer of data from multiple agencies for regional use in research, monitoring, management, public education, policy and decision making. Data are made available via a publicly accessible web site (www.streamnet.org) utilizing an on-line data query system, interactive map interfaces, or as independent data sets. Data from StreamNet are used by many state and federal agencies, consultants, universities, planners and other data projects. |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Contacts
| Contact | Organization | |
|---|---|---|
| Form submitter | ||
| Mike Banach | Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | mike_banach@psmfc.org |
| All assigned contacts | ||
| Bruce Schmidt | Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | bruce_schmidt@psmfc.org |
| Bruce Schmidt | Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | bruce_schmidt@psmfc.org |
Section 2. Locations
Province / subbasin: Mainstem/Systemwide / Systemwide
| Latitude | Longitude | Waterbody | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia River basin portions of the state. | |||
| Columbia River basin portions of the state. | |||
| Columbia River basin portions of the state. |
Section 3. Focal species
primary: All Anadromous Salmonidssecondary: Bull Trout
Section 4. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishments |
|---|
Section 5. Relationships to other projects
| Funding source | Related ID | Related title | Relationship |
|---|---|---|---|
| BPA | 200303600 | CBFWA Monitor/Eval Program (CSMEP) | Work performed under this proposal will provide data inventory services, data management and application development support for monitoring and recovery efforts being developed by the CSMEP project (Project# 2003-036-00). The data inventory basinwide will be completed. Applications to meet CSMEP needs for data acquisition, sharing and analysis will be developed. |
Section 6. Biological objectives
| Biological objectives | Full description | Associated subbasin plan | Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provide information for management and restoration | Working collaboratively with CSMEP, provide data management services and application development for multi-agency, regionally coordinated monitoring programs. | None | [Strategy left blank] |
| Support effective management and restoration | This project will provide indirect support to regional management, monitoring and restoration efforts. | None | Provide data services and application development services to the regional monitoring and assessment project (CSMEP) being conducted by the management agencies represented by CBFWA. |
Section 7. Work elements (coming back to this)
| Work element name | Work element title | Description | Start date | End date | Est budget |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Submit/Acquire Data | Complete inventory of fish population related data in Columbia subbasins | The agency partners in ID, OR and WA will complete the inventory of available data related to fish populations in subbasins of the Columbia Basin. This will complete work already underway. As inventories are completed, they will assist CSMEP, as needed, with actual acquisition, storage and management of the priority data sets. | 10/1/2006 | 9/30/2010 | $45,892 |
|
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
| Create/Manage/Maintain Database | Data entry and data management tools to support CSMEP analysis of monitoring data. | Agency partners will maintain the existing data inventory online entry tool, modify the tool as needed, and manage the inventory data. | 10/1/2006 | 9/30/2010 | $40,062 |
|
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
| Create/Manage/Maintain Database | Application development to suport CSMEP acquisition and management for analysis at full ESU range | The agency partners in ID, WA and OR, in collaboration with PSMFC, will develop computer applications to assist with aquisition and management of data needed by CSMEP for analysis of populations at a full ESU scale. | 10/1/2006 | 9/30/2010 | $286,605 |
|
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
| Disseminate Raw/Summary Data and Results | Assist the CSMEP project with sharing of data | The project partners in OR, WA and ID will assist with sharing of data among CSMEP partners for analysis and for interacting with regional management entities | 10/1/2006 | 9/30/2010 | $118,657 |
|
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
Section 8. Budgets
Itemized estimated budget
| Item | Note | FY07 | FY08 | FY09 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personnel | All requested funds will be expended by subcontractors in the state fisheries agencies | $81,044 | $85,096 | $89,351 |
| Fringe Benefits | [blank] | $33,701 | $35,386 | $37,155 |
| Supplies | [blank] | $3,390 | $3,560 | $3,737 |
| Travel | [blank] | $925 | $971 | $1,020 |
| Overhead | [blank] | $36,758 | $38,596 | $40,526 |
| Totals | $155,818 | $163,609 | $171,789 | |
Total estimated FY 2007-2009 budgets
| Total itemized budget: | $491,216 |
| Total work element budget: | $491,216 |
Cost sharing
| Funding source/org | Item or service provided | FY 07 est value ($) | FY 08 est value ($) | FY 09 est value ($) | Cash or in-kind? | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Totals | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Section 9. Project future
|
FY 2010 estimated budget: $0 FY 2011 estimated budget: $0 |
Comments: |
Future O&M costs:
Termination date: 09/30/2005
Comments: Long term need for data services from StreamNet for the CSMEP project are unknown. Depending on future needs, a new effort would have to be defined.
Final deliverables: Completion of data inventory in all Columbia Basin subbasins. Functional data tools to support CSMEP data analysis needs.
Section 10. Narrative and other documents
Reviews and recommendations
| FY07 budget | FY08 budget | FY09 budget | Total budget | Type | Category | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPCC FINAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Oct 23, 2006) [full Council recs] | ||||||
| $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | Expense | Basinwide | Do Not Fund |
| NPCC DRAFT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Sep 15, 2006) [full Council recs] | ||||||
| $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | Basinwide | ||
ISRP PRELIMINARY REVIEW (Jun 2, 2006)
Recommendation: Response requested
NPCC comments: This proposal is to fund a pilot project collaboration between StreamNet and CSMEP to develop data standards, data acquisition tools, and data dissemination for the region. A primary goal of CSMEP is to document, integrate, and make available existing monitoring data on species of concern. This proposal may complement the CSMEP proposal (although this proposal is not referenced in the CSMEP proposal) by providing the data management expertise. The overall idea may have merit but the proposal does not provide enough detail to evaluate the benefits of the project or the likelihood of success. A response should describe the type of data that will be collected and managed and relate these to fish and wildlife populations. How will protocols be established and enforced. How will quality assurance for the data be conducted? What evidence is available to show how useful the data will be to others? What is the value added to the data from this project? How will the project be monitored to determine its success?
ISRP FINAL REVIEW (Aug 31, 2006)
Recommendation: Response requested
NPCC comments: This proposal is to fund a pilot project collaboration between StreamNet and CSMEP to develop data standards, data acquisition tools, and data dissemination for the region. A primary goal of CSMEP is to document, integrate, and make available existing monitoring data on species of concern. This proposal may complement the CSMEP proposal (although this proposal is not referenced in the CSMEP proposal) by providing the data management expertise. The overall idea may have merit but the proposal does not provide enough detail to evaluate the benefits of the project or the likelihood of success. A response should describe the type of data that will be collected and managed and relate these to fish and wildlife populations. How will protocols be established and enforced. How will quality assurance for the data be conducted? What evidence is available to show how useful the data will be to others? What is the value added to the data from this project? How will the project be monitored to determine its success?