FY 2001 Action Plan proposal 26021
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 26021 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Purchase Tribal Wind Power |
| Proposal ID | 26021 |
| Organization | Sovereign Power, Inc (SPI) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Margaret M. Schaff |
| Mailing address | 749 Deer Trail Road Boulder, CO 80302 |
| Phone / email | 3034430182 / mschaff@worldnet.att.net |
| Manager authorizing this project | Margaret Schaff |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Action Plan |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / |
| Short description | Sovereign Power, Inc., and Siyeh Development Corporation wishes to sell the output of a wind turbin in Browning MT to BPA |
| Target species | All |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Sale: Average Monthly amount of wind energy from existing turbine: 14,204 KWh | 2 year power sale | $34,080 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| $0 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $0 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $0 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Not fundable. Inadequate proposal. This proposal is incomplete and does not include the necessary information to meet the solicitation criteria such as description of direct, on-the-ground benefits to impacted species. This is a proposal to sell wind-generated power to BPA so that they can reduce power generation by a like amount yielding benefits for the affected brood(s). This might be a good idea, but it requires more development and specification of detail to allow scientific review. Bonneville's engineering staff could estimate the potential spill benefit associated with the proposal and biologists could use these data to assess the fishery benefits that could be expected from the proposal.