FY 2002 Columbia Plateau proposal 200201600
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Determine lamprey species composition, larval distribution and adult abundance in the Deschutes Subbasin |
Proposal ID | 200201600 |
Organization | Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation, Oregon (CTWSRO) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Chris Brun |
Mailing address | 3430 W. 10th. The Dalles, OR. 97058 |
Phone / email | 5142961041 / cbrun@netcnct.net |
Manager authorizing this project | Patty O'Toole |
Review cycle | Columbia Plateau |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Deschutes |
Short description | The project will determine lamprey species composition and larval distribution in the Deschutes R. and tributaries. Adult abundance will be estimated in the Deschutes R. |
Target species | Pacific Lamprey, river lamprey, brook lamprey |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
44.829 | -121.086 | Deschutes River (Rm. 0-100) Mainstem and Trout Creek (44 49 17.56 121 05 13.74) |
45.2302 | -121.0595 | White River |
44.8548 | -121.07 | Warm Springs River (mainstem and tributaries) |
44.7572 | -121.2267 | Shitike Creek |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
9402600 | Pacific lamprey research and restoration project | Our project is consistent with lamprey research needs identified by this project. |
20121 | Evaluate habitat use and population dynamics of lampreys in Cedar Creek | We will use survey methodologies developed, in part, by this project. |
200002900 | Identification of larval Pacific lamprey, river lamprey, and western brook lamprey and thermal requirements of early life history stages of lampreys | Specimens will be supplied to this project for identification and key validation. Results from 2000029 will be used to implement our project. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Determine larval distribution and associated habitat in the lower Deschutes River subbasin. | a. Survey lower Deschutes subbasin tributaries for larval lamprey presence. | 3 | $31,360 | |
b. Determine habitat associations with larval lamprey distribution in lower Deschutes subbasin tributaries. | 3 | $31,360 | ||
2. Determine species composition of Lampetra in the lower Deschutes River sub-basin. | a. Collect and preserve 30 larval samples during implementation of objectives 1 and 3. | 1 | $5,772 | |
b. Provide samples to USGS-CRRL for identification. | 1 | $500 | ||
3. Estimate the numbers of lamprey emigrants, by developmental stage, from Warm Springs River and Shitike Creek. | a. Operate Humphrey juvenile emigrant trap in Warm Springs River. Enumerate and identify species composition of emigrants. | 3 | $3,136 | |
b. Operate rotary screw trap in Shitike Creek. Enumerate and identify species composition of emigrants. | 3 | $3,136 | ||
4. Evaluate the feasibility of estimating the escapement of adult lamprey in the Deschutes River upstream of Sherar’s Falls and estimate lamprey harvest at Sherar’s Falls. | a. Conduct a mark-recapture experiment to estimate adult lamprey escapement above Sherar's Falls. | $25,088 | ||
b. Conduct a statistical creel survey to estimate harvest of lamprey at Sherar's Falls. | 3 | $25,088 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|---|---|---|
1. Determine larval distribution and associated habitat in the lower Deschutes R. sub-basin. | 2003 | 2004 | $63,720 |
2. Determine species composition of Lampetra in the lower Deschutes R. sub-basin. | 2003 | 2004 | $6,272 |
3. Estimate the numbers of lamprey emigrants, by developmental stage, from Warm Springs R. and Shitike Cr. | 2003 | 2004 | $6,272 |
4. Evaluate the feasibility of estimating the escapement of adult lamprey in the Deschutes River upstream of Sherar’s Falls and estimate lamprey harvest at Sherar’s Falls. | 2003 | 2004 | $50,176 |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 |
---|---|
$107,971 | $107,971 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2002 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 1, 4 seasonal technicians | $54,433 |
Fringe | @ 23% | $12,519 |
Supplies | Includes purchase of two lamprey electrofishing units and pH/conductivity meter. | $15,000 |
Travel | Vehicle rental, mileage and insurance | $5,700 |
Indirect | @ 41.4% | $36,288 |
Capital | $0 | |
NEPA | $0 | |
PIT tags | $0 | |
Subcontractor | GIS and database support | $1,500 |
$125,440 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost | $125,440 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2002 budget request | $125,440 |
FY 2002 forecast from 2001 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
CTWSRO | Project Oversight | $3,000 | in-kind |
CTWSRO | Screw trap and humphrey trap | $10,000 | in-kind |
CTWSRO | GPS equipment | $3,000 | in-kind |
USGS-Columbia River Research Lab | Larval identification assistance | $5,000 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Fundable only if response is adequate
Jun 15, 2001
Comment:
Fundable if adequate responses are given to ISRP concerns. Among other pertinent facts, summarized from the fisheries literature, is information on the habitat preference of Pacific lamprey amocoetes. They are quite selective as to substrate type. This might be taken into account in the sampling plan to estimate their total abundance in the stream. The plan described seems inefficient. Lamprey are not likely to be found in cobble or boulder substrate, which probably predominate. A more efficient plan would require some information on location and abundance of substrate types, which might not be available prior to the sample survey. Stratification is ok if the habitat type stays consistent over time.
Sponsor of this proposal should participate in development of the response requested for #199402600 above.
Do not fund until sampling procedures are coordinated with other fisheries and water quality projects. Sampling (stream reach) should be coordinated with Projects #25088 and #25010. We see no reason to have multiple basinwide sampling procedures implemented in different projects. Subsampling procedures can be unique to the project.
Information transfer needs to be to a wider audience.
Please respond to general ISRP comments on this set of Lamprey projects provided above.
Comment:
Although little is known about lamprey in the Deschutes Subbasin managers do know population numbers have declined over the years and are likely to continue to decline. If funding/actions are delayed, the ability to conserve/restore lamprey population could be jeopardized.Comment:
Fundable. The response was adequate. Habitat and water quality attributes must be measured by methods that are compatible with regional monitoring and evaluation projects (e.g. #25010).See ISRP detailed comments on Lamprey projects
Comment:
Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESUN/A
Comments
Already ESA Req? N/A
Biop? no
Comment:
As part of the current Columbia Plateau review the ISRP (document 2001-8) provided a "fundable" recommendation for a new start proposal for lamprey, project 25007. The proposed project will determine lamprey species composition and larval distribution in the Deschutes River and its tributaries, and determine adult abundance. ISRP, as noted in General Issue 6, has expressed some concerns about the need for coordination and sharing of information on lamprey projects throughout the Columbia Plateau province. Issue summary for the Northwest Power Planning Council's Columbia Plateau provincial review Page 20 Council packet version November 2, 2001
Staff Recommendation: Lamprey are of great cultural significance to the CTWSRO, although little is currently known about the population status in the Deschutes. Project 25007 will help determine the extent of lamprey presence in the Deschutes basin and staff recommends funding the project. The Council should stress the need for coordination of this project with work ongoing in the Umatilla basin and other basins within the Columbia Plateau province. Due to continued importance and complexity of lamprey projects there is a need to have Bonneville provide the role of coordinator of the Technical Working Group for lamprey projects (e.g. similar to the TWG associated with captive propagation projects). This oversight by BPA will allow the project sponsors to address the issues and concerns raised by the ISRP and assimilate the projects to ensure that they are proceeding in a systematic, and logical progression of studies that will benefit the rehabilitation of Pacific Lamprey in a coordinated and cost effective way (see General Issue #6).
Budget effect on base program (Project 25007):
FY 2002 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 |
---|---|---|
>Increase $125,440 | Increase $107,971 | Increase $107,971 |
Comment:
Comment:
Accruals look good. 05 objective would be new and would have to be addressed through within year process, SCOPE CHANGEComment:
We will ask for a $12,029 increase during FY 2005 to add an objective to this project. The new objective will be to track the movements of adult lamprey in the Deschutes subbasin via radio-telemetry.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$107,971 | $107,971 | $107,971 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website