FY 2002 Columbia Plateau proposal 25030

Additional documents

TitleType
25030 Narrative Narrative
25030 Sponsor Response to the ISRP Response
25030 Powerpoint Presentation Powerpoint Presentation
25030 Power Point Presentation Embedded Movie File Powerpoint Presentation Embedded File

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleFactors limiting the shrubsteppe raptor community in the Columbia Plateau Province of eastern Washington
Proposal ID25030
OrganizationWashington Department of Fish & Wildlife (WDFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameJames W. Watson
Mailing address7759 Wilderness Drive Concrete, Washington 98237
Phone / email3608538031 / watson@ncia.com
Manager authorizing this projectD. John Pierce, Chief Wildlife Scientist
Review cycleColumbia Plateau
Province / SubbasinColumbia Plateau / Crab Creek
Short descriptionAssess habitat, prey, and contaminants of ferruginous hawks and golden eagles in native habitats and provide recommendations on how to improve their rates of nest occupancy in the Columbia Basin.
Target speciesFerruginous hawk, golden eagle
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Field work primarily in Crab Creek, Mainstem Columbia, and Yakima Subbasins
47.39 -118.95 Crab subbasin
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
0 Ferruginous Hawk Winter Ranges and Migration (ongoing cooperative project between WDFW/USFWS/Woodland Park Zoo) data sharing
0 Effects of Agriculture Conversion and Associated Habitat Fragmentation on Shrubsteppe-associated Wildlife and the Condition of Extant Shrubsteppe in the Columbia Plateau Province (BPA proposal submitted by M. Vander Haegen, S. West, and S. Snyder) Detailed vegetation mapping produced by this project will be used in analysis of habitat/raptor productivity relationships, as will habitat-specific occurrence of small mammals that will be used in analysis of raptor diets/habitat availability.
0 A Cooperative Approach to Evaluating Avian and Mammalian Responses to Shrubsteppe Restoration in the Crab Creek Subbasin (BPA proposal submitted by M. Schroeder and J. Skalski) Habitat-specific occurrence of small mammals in restored shrubsteppe habitats determined in this study will be used in analysis of raptor diets/habitat availability.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
1.Habitat, prey, and productivity relationships 1. activity and productivity raptor surveys 3 $11,000
1.Habitat, prey, and productivity relationships 3. collect prey remains at nests 3 $5,580
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
1. Habitat, prey, and productivity relationships 2002 2004 $5,000
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2003FY 2004
$16,580$16,580

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
1.Habitat, prey, and productivity relationships 3. Raptor trapping/transmitter deployment/video monitoring 2 $0
2. Movements/survival/contaminants 1. Satellite data retrieval 4 $0
2. Movements/survival/contaminants 2. Contaminants analysis 4 $0
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
1. Habitat, prey, and productivity relationships 2003 2006 $144,750
2. Movements/survival/contaminants 2003 2006 $36,000
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005FY 2006
$77,750$45,500$45,500$12,000

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2002 cost
Personnel FTE: 0.16 $5,000
Fringe $580
Supplies Survey costs, climbing gear $10,000
Travel Vehicle $1,000
$16,580
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost$16,580
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2002 budget request$16,580
FY 2002 forecast from 2001$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
WDFW PI Salary, Travel, Benefits @ $50,000/yr $250,000 in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fundable only if response is adequate
Date:
Jun 15, 2001

Comment:

Fundable if adequate responses are given to ISRP concerns. The project directly addresses issues related to raptors of concern. The proposal appears sound and includes strong basic, but typical, raptor biology investigations. Proposal does good job of identifying possible causes for raptor decline -winter mortality, lead poisoning, nesting habitat loss, etc. - but did not show how the study could take advantage of some unique situations, settings, timings, or study design to disprove any of these possible factors. It doesn't seem to have strong clear hypotheses to test; instead gathering data, performing some correlations, without compelling evidence of utility for raptor conservation. Strong coordination with two other proposed BPA projects (25039 and 25046) is essential for the success of this proposed work. Reviewers were also curious about the present status of Black-tailed jackrabbits and their cycling, as well as the role of Black-tailed jackrabbits for ferruginous hawk and golden eagles. Are the rabbit populations so low they are not cycling. They were abundant in the 1930s.

This proposal also involves activities in the Mainstem Columbia and Yakima but is grouped here to gain a sense of the entire set of WDFW shrub steppe related proposals.


Recommendation:
Recommended Action
Date:
Aug 3, 2001

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 10, 2001

Comment:

Fundable. The response was marginal, and the priority (benefits to wildlife affected by the hydrosystem) appears low. The project directly addresses issues related to raptors of concern. The proposal appears sound and includes strong basic, but typical, raptor biology investigations. The proposal does a good job of identifying possible causes for raptor decline -- winter mortality, lead poisoning, nesting habitat loss, etc. However, the proposal is not for a study that could take advantage of some unique situations, settings, timings, to disprove any of these possible factors. Instead, the proposal is designed to gather data and perform correlations, and the results are intended to have direct practical application -- the identification and elimination of mortality and contaminant sources.
Recommendation:
Date:
Oct 1, 2001

Comment:

Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESU
N/A

Comments

Already ESA Req? N/A

Biop? no


Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Jan 3, 2002

Comment: