FY 2002 Columbia Plateau proposal 200203200

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleInvestigating passage of ESA-listed juvenile fall chinook salmon at Lower Granite Dam during winter when the fish bypass system is inoperable.
Proposal ID200203200
OrganizationU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Geological Survey (USFWS/USGS)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameWilliam P. Connor
Mailing addressP.O. Box 18 Ahsahka, ID 83520
Phone / email2084767242 / william_connor@fws.gov
Manager authorizing this projectHoward L. Burge
Review cycleColumbia Plateau
Province / SubbasinColumbia Plateau / Mainstem Snake
Short descriptionDescribe passage timing, genetic lineage, scale patterns, and locations of fall chinook salmon that hold over in Lower Granite Reservoir during the winter.
Target speciesFall chinook salmon
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
46.23 -116.57 Lower Granite Reservoir at Lewiston, Idaho
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription
NMFS Action 190 NMFS The Action Agencies shall continue to fund studies that monitor survival, growth, and other early life history attributes of Snake River wild juvenile fall chinook.
NMFS/BPA Action 190 NMFS The Action Agencies shall continue to fund studies that monitor survival, growth, and other early life history attributes of Snake River wild juvenile fall chinook.

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
199102900 Life history and survival of fall chinook salmon Use this project's radio telemetry equipment and infrastructure; share recature data on their PIT-tagged fish
199302900 Survival of juvenile salmon in Snake River Share recapture data on their PIT-tagged fish

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
1. Refine non-lethal methods for identifying the genetic lineage (i.e., fall or spring run) of holdover wild juvenile chinook salmon smolts for application to existing tissue samples collected from fish at Lower Granite and Little Goose in 1998, and a. Validate and publish the non-lethal method for determining run membership of individual chinook salmon smolts. 1 $30,000
1. b. Summarize and publish the data collected at Lower Granite and Little Goose dams in 1998. 1 $15,000
2. Refine non-lethal methods for identifying the age at saltwater entry for unmarked Snake River fall chinook salmon adults collected at Lower Granite from 1998 to 2001, and then assess the importance of the holdover strategy to adult returns to the Snak a. Validate and publish scale pattern analysis methods for determining age at saltwater entry for adult fall chinook salmon 1 $15,000
2. b. Determine the age at saltwater entry for unmarked adults sampled at Lower Granite Dam from 1999 to 2005. 5 $3,000
3. Determine if holdover wild fall chinook salmon smolts pass Lower Granite Dam during the winter when the fish bypass systems are shut down. a. Determine where holdover juvenile fall chinook salmon over winter in Lower Granite Reservoir. 3 $10,000
3. b. Determine the feasibility of capturing holdover juvenile fall chinook salmon in Lower Granite Reservoir. 1 $3,000
3. c. Determine when holdover fall chinook salmon pass Lower Granite Dam. 2 $100,000
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
1. Refine non-lethal methods for identifying the genetic lineage (i.e., fall or spring run) of holdover wild juvenile chinook salmon smolts for application to existing tissue samples collected from fish at Lower Granite and Little Goose in 1998, and 2002 2002 $0
2. Refine non-lethal methods for identifying the age at saltwater entry for unmarked Snake River fall chinook salmon adults collected at Lower Granite from 1998 to 2001, and then assess the importance of the holdover strategy to adult returns to the Snak 2002 2006 $60,000
3. Determine if holdover wild fall chinook salmon smolts pass Lower Granite Dam during the winter when the fish bypass systems are shut down. 2002 2004 $200,000
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005FY 2006
$131,000$131,000$18,000$18,000

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2002 cost
Personnel $61,500
Fringe $21,720
Supplies $35,000
Travel $5,000
Indirect $49,280
Other Boat operation $3,500
$176,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost$176,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2002 budget request$176,000
FY 2002 forecast from 2001$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
USGS Radio telemetry equipment $90,000 in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fundable - no response required
Date:
Jun 15, 2001

Comment:

Fundable.

This is a good proposal for research needed to clarify the migration timing of fall chinook salmon that may overwinter in the Lower Snake River. Project personnel have identified a gap in understanding of life-history of chinook salmon. Bypass systems for migrating juvenile chinook salmon are closed between November and April at Lower Granite Dam. Recent information shows that this may impede emigrating fall chinook salmon that did not escape before November, but presumably stayed in the system through much of the winter (or alter our migration understanding, because of lack of monitoring data in winter). Preliminary data show that these fish make a significant contribution to the returning adults from a given brood. The proposal is to assess the significance of this situation for fall chinook salmon.

The proposal is generally complete and persuasive. The information in Part 1 is complete. There is an excellent background section. The work is justified with specific action items from the NMFS BiOp and the Subbasin Summary (but strangely not the FWP). There is a good description of the relationships to other projects, not just BPA's. There are good objectives (although stated more like tasks than as desired outcomes), tasks, and methods. One wonders if the scale pattern analysis for sea-water entry has been verified with elemental analyses (e.g., Sr/Ca ratios). There is an appropriate reference list. Staff resumes are complete and the staff is clearly competent to do the work. This is the same crew that has been doing the wild fall chinook studies underway since the early 1990s and this project is a logical extension of that work (but not within the existing scope). The studies are needed and this is the right group to do them.

Based on the presentation and discussion, it is even more convincing that we have generated an overwintering stock of fall chinook through our thermal manipulations of the Snake-Clearwater system. If it is happening, we are missing much of it with our standard fish monitoring operations that end in fall and don't begin again until spring. This change in life-cycle could be highly important for the general notion of species' adaptability and for the persistence of the Snake River wild fall chinook. It must be tested with the sort of work proposed here. A peculiarity is that the proposal continually implies that the bypass system should perhaps be operated for these fish, presumably to improve their survival, yet it provides data suggesting that their rate of survival is high relative to fish that do not hold over (i.e., use the bypass when it operates). Perhaps an alternative hypothesis deserves exploration. In summary, this is important work that deserves high priority for funding.


Recommendation:
High Priority
Date:
Aug 3, 2001

Comment:

This project addresses RPA 190. This proposal will need to be reviewed in the Systemwide Project Review Process to put it in context with all other passage projects. Funding should be provided to insure that this project is supported through the Systemwide review process.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 10, 2001

Comment:

Fundable. This is a good proposal for research needed to clarify the migration timing of fall chinook salmon that may overwinter in the Lower Snake River. Project personnel have identified a gap in understanding of life-history of chinook salmon. Bypass systems for migrating juvenile chinook salmon are closed between November and April at Lower Granite Dam. Recent information shows that this may impede emigrating fall chinook salmon that did not escape before November, but presumably stayed in the system through much of the winter (or alter our migration understanding, because of lack of monitoring data in winter). Preliminary data show that these fish make a significant contribution to the returning adults from a given brood. The proposal is to assess the significance of this situation for fall chinook salmon.

The proposal is generally complete and persuasive. The information in Part 1 is complete. There is an excellent background section. The work is justified with specific action items from the NMFS BiOp and the Subbasin Summary (but strangely not the FWP). There is a good description of the relationships to other projects, not just BPA's. There are good objectives (although stated more like tasks than as desired outcomes), tasks, and methods. One wonders if the scale pattern analysis for seawater entry has been verified with elemental analyses (e.g., Sr/Ca ratios). There is an appropriate reference list. Staff resumes are complete and the staff is clearly competent to do the work. This is the same crew that has been doing the wild fall chinook studies underway since the early 1990s and this project is a logical extension of that work (but not within the existing scope). The studies are needed and this is the right group to do them.

Based on the presentation and discussion, it is even more convincing that we have generated an overwintering stock of fall chinook through our thermal manipulations of the Snake-Clearwater system. If it is happening, we are missing much of it with our standard fish monitoring operations that end in fall and don't begin again until spring. This change in life-cycle could be highly important for the general notion of species' adaptability and for the persistence of the Snake River wild fall chinook. It must be tested with the sort of work proposed here. A peculiarity is that the proposal continually implies that the bypass system should perhaps be operated for these fish, presumably to improve their survival, yet it provides data suggesting that their rate of survival is high relative to fish that do not hold over (i.e., use the bypass when it operates). Perhaps an alternative hypothesis deserves exploration. In summary, this is important work that deserves high priority for funding.


Recommendation:
Date:
Oct 1, 2001

Comment:

Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESU
Will provide a greater understanding of migratory behavior for the entire Snake River Fall chinook ESU, using radio telemetry, scale analysis, molecular techniques and other methods. The information gained through this project has the potential to allow more effective operation of bypass systems for Snake River Fall Chinook.

Comments
Fall chinook have low passage survival; this project will help determine how SR Fall chinook migratory behavior and bypass operations may interact to contribute to that low survival.

Already ESA Req? no

Biop? yes


Recommendation:
Rank A
Date:
Oct 16, 2001

Comment:

This proposal would describe passage timing, genetic lineage, scale patterns, and locations of fall chinook salmon that hold over in Lower Granite Reservoir during the winter. This proposal would meet objectives of the NMFS Biological Opinion.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Jan 3, 2002

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 6, 2002

Comment:

BPA intends to fund. This proposal would describe passage timing, genetic lineage, scale patterns and locations of fall chinook salmon that hold over in Lower Granite Reservoir during the winter. This proposal would meet objectives of the NMFS Biological Opinion RPA - 190.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:

Project was not recommended, but Bi-op BPA project.
Recommendation:
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:

Assuming that future project activities are not expanded.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$131,000 $18,000 $18,000

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website