FY 2002 Columbia Plateau proposal 195505500
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 195505500 Narrative | Narrative |
| Columbia Plateau: Umatilla Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
| Columbia Plateau: Umatilla Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Umatilla Tribal Fish & Wildlife Enforcement |
| Proposal ID | 195505500 |
| Organization | Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Ron D. Harnden |
| Mailing address | 733033 July Grounds Lane Pendleton, OR 97801 |
| Phone / email | 5412780550 / RonHarnden@ctuir.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | Ron D. Harnden |
| Review cycle | Columbia Plateau |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Umatilla |
| Short description | Increase law enforcement (LE) protection to fish, wildlife, their critical habitats and other essential natural resources within watersheds managed by CTUIR. The program will be coordinated with all other resource enhancement projects of the tribe. |
| Target species | Coho, fall chinook, spring chinook, summer steelhead, bull trout and pacific lamprey. Summer steelhead are part of the listed mid-columbia ESU and bull trout are part of the listed Columbia River population segment plus riparian related wildlife species. |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Project ranges from the mouth of the Umatilla River to the headwaters | ||
| Headwaters of the Umatilla River Basin to the East | ||
| Headwaters of the Umatilla River Basin to the South | ||
| Headwaters of the Umatilla River Basin to the West | ||
| 45.67 | -118.79 | Umatilla River |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 1997 | Implement all fish conservation and protection action contained in statement of work. |
| 1998 | Implement all fish conservation and protection action contained in statement of work. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 20127 | Walla Walla Basin Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation | Enforcement Component protects investment of field activities/equipment, habitat restoration efforts and ultimate survival of fish & wildlife resources tied to this project |
| 9000501 | Umatilla Basin Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation | Enforcement Component protects investment of field activities/equipment, habitat restoration efforts and ultimate survival of fish & wildlife resources tied to this project |
| 97100010 | Umatilla Basin Habitat Enhancement | Enforcement Component protects investment of field activities/equipment, habitat restoration efforts and ultimate survival of fish & wildlife resources tied to this project |
| 20131 | John Day Basin Habitat Enhancement | Enforcement Component protects investment of field activities/equipment, habitat restoration efforts and ultimate survival of fish & wildlife resources tied to this project |
| 9604601 | Walla Walla Basin Habitat Enhancement | Enforcement Componentprotects investment of field activities/equipment, habitat restoration efforts and ultimate survival of fish & wildlife resources tied to this project |
| 9608300 | Grande Ronde Habitat Enhancement | Enforcement Componentprotects investment of field activities/equipment, habitat restoration efforts and ultimate survival of fish & wildlife resources tied to this project |
| 9800703 | Grande Ronde Satellite Facility | Enforcement Componentprotects investment of field activities/equipment, habitat restoration efforts and ultimate survival of fish & wildlife resources tied to this project |
| 8343500 | Umatilla Hatchery Satellite Facility O+M | Enforcement Component protects investment of field activities/equipment, habitat restoration efforts and ultimate survival of fish & wildlife resources tied to this project |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA | NA | $0 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| NA | $0 |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA | NA | NA | $0 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| NA | $0 |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Provide enhanced enforcement of laws and rulesfor the protection of anadromous fish, resident fish, wildlife, and their critical habitat - with emphasis on depleted populations on the Umatilla Indian Reservation and ceded land. | A. Provide enhanced level of law enforcement officers in the field. | Ongoing | $5,450 | |
| B. Provide training relative to fisheries enforcement. | Ongoing | $5,450 | ||
| C. Continue enforcement efforts and public awareness during anadromous salmonid runs. | Ongoing | $5,450 | ||
| D. Support enforcement efforts of the protection of critical habitats. | Ongoing | $5,450 | ||
| E. Continue enforcement efforts of the protection of critical habitats. | Ongoing | $5,450 | ||
| F. Maintain an integrated Task Force reporting system. | Ongoing | $5,450 | ||
| 2. Improved cost-effectiveness of fisheries and habitat enforcement efforts via improved coordination with other Columbia Basin enforcement and regulatory agencies. | A. Coordinate with other federal, state and tribal law enforcement and fishery management programs. | Ongoing | $6,533 | |
| B. Coordinate with other federal, state and tribal law enforcement and fishery management programs. | Ongoing | $6,533 | ||
| C. Conduct environmental and habitat enforcement throughout tributary watersheds in coordination with regulatory agencies. | Ongoing | $6,533 | ||
| D. Coordinate field operations in specific locations with local law enforcement agencies. | Ongoing | $6,533 | ||
| E. Work within tribal policy guidelines in an effort to expand enforcement to include protection of spawning and habitat areas. | Ongoing | $6,533 | ||
| 3. Optimize voluntary compliance of laws and rules to protect Columbia Basin fishes and their critical habitats via increased public involvement. | A. Increase public awareness of the illegal harvest and habitat degradation on Columbia Basin salmonid stocks with an emphasis on conservation. | Ongoing | $16,334 | |
| B. Enhance the public awareness and deterrent effect of various law enforcement efforts. | Ongoing | $16,334 | ||
| 4. Develop an operational plan that will compliment the goals and objectives of state, tribal and federal fish and wildlife management entities. | A. Develop cooperative enforcement plans for CTUIR. | Ongoing | $16,334 | |
| B. Coordinate with regional fish and wildlife management, planning and funding entities within the Columbia Basin to identify and prioritize law enforcement activities. | Ongoing | $16,334 | ||
| 5. Maximize the accountability of the enhanced law enforcement program and achievement of results for the protection of fish and their critical habitats via monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of the program. | A. Develop performance standards and specific quantitative and qualitative criteria to objectively measure achievement of results. | Ongoing | $16,334 | |
| B. Collect and summarize law enforcement statistics using a consistent scientifically valid methodology and document the results of the CTUIR law enforcement program through quarterly progress reports and annual completion reports. | Ongoing | $16,334 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Provide enhanced enforcement of laws and rulesfor the protection of anadromous fish, resident fish, wildlife, and their critical habitat - with emphasis on depleted populations on the Umatilla Indian Reservation and ceded land. | 2002 | 2006 | $180,690 |
| 2. Improved cost-effectiveness of fisheries and habitat enforcement efforts via improved coordination with other Columbia Basin enforcement and regulatory agencies. | 2002 | 2006 | $180,495 |
| 3. Optimize voluntary compliance of laws and rules to protect Columbia Basin fishes and their critical habitats via increased public involvement. | 2002 | 2006 | $180,510 |
| 4. Develop an operational plan that will compliment the goals and objectives of state, tribal and federal fish and wildlife management entities. | 2002 | 2006 | $180,510 |
| 5. Maximize the accountability of the enhanced law enforcement program and achievement of results for the protection of fish and their critical habitats via monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of the program. | 2002 | 2006 | $180,510 |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
| FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $171,506 | $180,081 | $189,085 | $198,539 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA | NA | $0 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| NA | $0 |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2002 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 2 | $67,238 |
| Fringe | 30% | $18,146 |
| Supplies | $4,515 | |
| Travel | $8,925 | |
| Indirect | 34% | $41,445 |
| Other | Vehicle Expense | $23,100 |
| $163,369 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2002 cost | $163,369 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2002 budget request | $163,369 |
| FY 2002 forecast from 2001 | $155,201 |
| % change from forecast | 5.3% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
Project funding was discontinued in 1999-2001. A proposal was submitted for FY2001 (was not funded) which contained an FY2002 out-year projection.
Reason for change in scope
Scope same as previous years funded in 1997 + 1998.
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| Umatilla Tribal Police | Fish & Wildlife Officer | $45,000 | cash |
| Umatilla Tribal Police | Vehicle Expense | $10,000 | cash |
| Umatilla Tribal Police | Administrative Duties, Supervision, etc. | $7,000 | cash |
| Umatilla Tribal Police | Office Space, Utilities and Communication Services | $7,500 | cash |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Fundable - no response required
Jun 15, 2001
Comment:
Fundable. This is a proposal from the CTUIR Fish and Wildlife Enforcement division to provide three enforcement officers to enforce fisheries and habitat regulations on both reservation and ceded lands. The proposal makes a convincing case for funding enforcement officers. Only .5FTE is currently funded for fish and wildlife enforcement. Enforcement now has good coordination with fish and wildlife staff in the field, but it is unreasonable to expect that sufficient enforcement coverage could be maintained this way. Enforcement of fishing and habitat regulations are necessary parts of environmental management. The success of fish and wildlife restoration activities depends on maintaining enforcement coverage to minimize poaching and ensure compliance with habitat protection measures.
The proposal contains a substantial component of monitoring and evaluation, including the development of targets and criteria for specific performance objectives of the law enforcement program. Monitoring and evaluation focuses on coordination, contacts, warnings, arrests, seizures and critical habitat protected, improved public awareness and public participation, voluntary compliance and decreased illegal take of anadromous and resident fish stocks. It also refers to expected outcomes of increased survival and inter-dam passage, improved spawning escapement, although it would not monitor these directly.
Comment:
This is a new project and not an ongoing project. The tribe currently has only 0.5 FTE for enforcement throughout NE Oregon which is inadequate. Through this proposal, enforcement is proposed for all seeded land. Reviewers indicate that there appears to be a lack of coordination among enforcement proposals. The CTWSRO, ODFW, and CTUIR need to meet and coordinate prior to funding. If funded, this project should be held to the same standards as the two existing conservation enforcement projects currently being funded under the fish and wildlife program.Comment:
Fundable. This is a proposal from the CTUIR Fish and Wildlife Enforcement division to provide three enforcement officers to enforce fisheries and habitat regulations on both reservation and ceded lands. The proposal makes a convincing case for funding enforcement officers. Only .5FTE is currently funded for fish and wildlife enforcement. Enforcement now has good coordination with fish and wildlife staff in the field, but it is unreasonable to expect that sufficient enforcement coverage could be maintained this way. Enforcement of fishing and habitat regulations is a necessary part of environmental management. The success of fish and wildlife restoration activities depends on maintaining enforcement coverage to minimize poaching and ensure compliance with habitat protection measures.The proposal contains a substantial component of monitoring and evaluation, including the development of targets and criteria for specific performance objectives of the law enforcement program. Monitoring and evaluation focuses on coordination, contacts, warnings, arrests, seizures and critical habitat protected, improved public awareness and public participation, voluntary compliance and decreased illegal take of anadromous and resident fish stocks. It also refers to expected outcomes of increased survival and inter-dam passage, and improved spawning escapement, although it would not monitor these directly.
Comment:
Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESUN/A
Comments
Already ESA Req? N/A
Biop? no
Comment:
This is a new proposal, not an on-going project (this particular project number does not exist). If we were to fund it, we might consider cost-sharing with BIA funds, as we did earlier. BPA certainly has an interest in protecting the very valuable fish that result from our extensive program investments. However, this basic approach of fish and wildlife management is not a mitigation function. There appears to be an overlap in enforcement duties with other state, federal and tribal governments on tribal ceded lands.Comment:
Comment:
Comment: