FY 2002 Columbia Plateau proposal 198802200

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleUmatilla River Fish Passage Operations
Proposal ID198802200
OrganizationConfederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameBrian Zimmerman
Mailing addressP.O. Box 638 Pendleton, OR 97801
Phone / email5412764109 / brianzimmerman@ctuir.com
Manager authorizing this projectGary A. James
Review cycleColumbia Plateau
Province / SubbasinColumbia Plateau / Umatilla
Short descriptionIncrease survival of migrating juvenile and adult salmon and steelhead in the Umatilla Basin by operating passage facilities, flow enhancement measures, trapping facilities, and transport equipment to provide adequate passage conditions.
Target speciesCoho, Fall Chinook, Spring Chinook, and Summer Steelhead. Summer Steelhead are part of the Mid-Columbia ESU.
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
45.8822 -119.3233 Threemile Dam Facility on the lower Umatilla River near the town of Umatilla
45.5875 -118.7844 McKay Reservoir on McKay Creek just south of the town of Pendleton
The project works in the entire Umatilla River Basin, primarily in the mainstem between river mile 1 and 55
45.9144 -119.3384 Umatilla River
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1989-2001 Trapping and transportation of juvenile and adult salmonids has occurred annually to increase survival of juvenile and adult migrants.
1989-2001 Collected and transported broodstock for basin artificial production programs on an annual basis.
1989-2001 Collected and provided data on adult returns to Threemile Dam on an annual basis.
1991-2001 Operated and monitored passage facilities, including screen sites, juvenile bypasses, traps, and adult ladders annually to increase survival of juvenile and adult migrants.
1993-2001 Oversite and coordination of the Umatilla Basin Project flow enhancement effort has occurred annually to provide increased flows during critical migration periods.
1996-2001 Hauled surplus hatchery adult salmon to the Umatilla and Walla Walla basins to supplement natural spawning on an annual basis.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
8902700 Power Repay - Umatilla Basin Project Proposed project provides oversite and coordination of Umatilla Basin Project flow enhancement operations.
8343600 Umatilla Passage Facilities O&M Proposed project works in coordination with project 8343600 to operate passage facilities and provides oversite to project 8343600 on maintenance of those facilities.
8902401 Umatilla River/WEID Screens M&E Proposed project operates passage facilities that project 8902401conducts M&E at and provides migration information to project 8902401.
8403300 Umatilla Hatchery O&M Proposed project provides adequate passage for juveniles produced at Umatilla Hatchery and provides broodstock for Umatilla Hatchery production.
8343500 Umatilla Hatchery Satellite Facilities O&M Proposed project provides adequate passage for juveniles released by project 8343500 and collects and transports broodstock to satellite facilities operated by project 8343500.
9000500 Umatilla Hatchery M&E Proposed project provides return data for hatchery adults and migration data on juveniles to project 9000500.
9000501 Umatilla Basin Natural Production M&E Project provides adequate passage for natural adults and juveniles to and from natural production areas. Also provides return data for natural adults and migration data on juveniles to project 9000501.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
1. Increase the survival of migrating adult and juvenile salmon and steelhead. a. Monitor river conditions and passage facility operations to ensure adequate passage conditions exist. Ongoing $101,543 Yes
1. b. Operate adult trapping facilities Ongoing $158,678 Yes
1. c. Operate juvenile trapping facilities Ongoing $12,692 Yes
1. d. Operate transportation equipment Ongoing $71,066 Yes
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
1. Increase the survival of migrating adult and juvenile salmon and steelhead. 2003 2006 $1,556,723
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005FY 2006
$361,178$379,237$398,199$418,109

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2002 cost
Personnel FTE: 3.42 - Combined Umatilla and Walla Walla Fish Passage Operations projects - ~80% for Umatilla here $115,651
Fringe 33% $38,164
Supplies $11,267
Travel $11,678
Indirect 34% $60,099
Subcontractor ODFW - subcontractor participates in all tasks in conjunction with CTUIR - ~1FTE Umatilla $107,120
$343,979
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost$343,979
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2002 budget request$343,979
FY 2002 forecast from 2001$344,000
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fundable - no response required
Date:
Jun 15, 2001

Comment:

Fundable. This proposal is a continuation of a 13-year project to operate fish passage facilities on the Umatilla River. The proposal is well written and complete. This appears to have been a successful project over a period of considerable evolution as fish populations have been progressively restored and water returned to the river. The long-range objective is to phase out this project as river flows improve and problems with in-river migration are dealt with.

They need to make the ties of how this fits with program's Monitoring and evaluation project 199000501. They state on page 6 that they participate in the Umatilla Management and Monitoring and Evaluation Oversite (sic) Committee. What we are looking for is a specific statement of how they work closely with both monitoring and evaluation projects to assure that any data collected are shared with them.


Recommendation:
High Priority
Date:
Aug 3, 2001

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 10, 2001

Comment:

Fundable. This proposal is a continuation of a 13-year project to operate fish passage facilities on the Umatilla River. The proposal is well written and complete. This appears to have been a successful project over a period of considerable evolution as fish populations have been progressively restored and water returned to the river. The long-range objective is to phase out this project as river flows improve and problems with in-river migration are dealt with.

The sponsors need to make the ties of how this fits with program's Monitoring and evaluation project 199000501. They state on page 6 that they participate in the Umatilla Management and Monitoring and Evaluation Oversite (sic) Committee. What we are looking for is a specific statement of how they work closely with both monitoring and evaluation projects to assure that any data collected are shared with them.


Recommendation:
Date:
Oct 1, 2001

Comment:

Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESU
Project will increase survival of migrating juvenile & adult salmon & steelhead in the Umatilla Basin by operating passage facilities, flow enhancement measures, trapping facilities, & transport equipment to provide adequate passage conditions.

Comments
Proposal is a continuation of a 13-year project to operate fish passage facilities on the Umatilla River. As a result of this project, fish populations have been restored and water returned to the river.

Already ESA Req? no

Biop? NO


Recommendation:
Rank A
Date:
Oct 16, 2001

Comment:

Although these activities, e.g., operating and maintaining fihs ladders, bypasses, screens, and trap and haul equipment, are essential in the Umatilla subbasin, this project should consider cost sharing from the irrigation districts and /or BOR, since the work is mitigation for BOR irrigation activities
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Jan 3, 2002

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 6, 2002

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:

Accruals look good, though check for over accruals. Indirect increases, COLA.
Recommendation:
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:

In FY 04 CTUIR is seeking an increase of $16,493 to cover previous years unfunded increases of Indirect rates. Unfunded 2002 Indirect rate increase @ 37.2% = $6,478. Unfunded 2003 Indirect rate increase @ 39.64% = $10,015.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$362,164 $362,164 $362,164

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website