FY 2002 Columbia Plateau proposal 199405900

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleYakima Basin Environmental Education
Proposal ID199405900
OrganizationBureau of Reclamation (BOR)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameJim Esget
Mailing address1917 Marsh Road Yakima, WA 98901
Phone / email5095755848 / jesget@pn.usbr.gov
Manager authorizing this projectJim Esget
Review cycleColumbia Plateau
Province / SubbasinColumbia Plateau / Yakima
Short description
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
46.4 -120.32 Yakima Basin from Cascade Crest to confluence of the Columbia River
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1992 Education Program of the Year from Washington State Wildlife Commission
1998 Governor Locke visits program
1998 Governor Locke includes mention of program in his state of the state address
1999 Grants from BOR and Forest Service provide additional aquariums for raising salmon in the classroom
2000 Program partners with BOR. They provide $100,000 for each of the next two years
2001 Julie Bradley retires, Julie Larson becomes program director

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
1. Provide relevant, hands-on curriculum to all participating teachers and their students a. Develop communications links with local research projects that have the potential for student involvement ongoing $27,500
b. Involve students in community problem solving related to local environmental issues, and arrange for area scientists to participate in teacher training sessions and student presentations ongoing $25,000 Yes
2. Provide teachers and students with necessary equipment and materials to participate in local environmental education activities a. Identify, purchase and maintain equipment related to teacher training field trip topics ongoing $15,000
b. Organize a check-out system for the equipment and materials ongoing $500
3. Continue to support teachers and students who have participated in the program a. Provide updated information and access to newly acquired resources ongoing $500
b. Provide partnerships with other community agencies, groups, and organizations to student projects ongoing $5,000 Yes
4. Foster community partnerships to improve both education and the environment a. Involve various community agencies and organizations in active participation in classroom activities ongoing $15,000
b. Offer opportunities for student involvement in area projects sponsored by local agencies and organizations ongoing $15,000
5. Stimulate student interest in science and the environment as possible career choices a. Arrange for local biologists and other scientists to participate in field trip training's and classroom presentations ongoing $10,000 Yes
b. Offer opportunities for student involvement in area projects sponsored by local agencies and organizations ongoing $500 Yes
6. Restore and enhance local habitat a. Arrange partnerships with local agencies and organizations to involve students in ongoing relevant restoration projects ongoing $6,000 Yes
b. Provide curriculum and activities aimed at creating positive attitudes about restoration and the environment among future decision makers ongoing $10,000
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
1. Provide relevant, hands-on curriculum to all participating teachers and their students 2003 2006 $221,000
2. Provide teachers and students with necessary equipment and materials to participate in local environmental education activities 2003 2006 $65,000
3. Continue to support teachers and students who have participated in the program 2003 2006 $23,000
4. Foster community partnerships to improve both education and the environment 2003 2006 $124,000
5. Stimulate student interest in science and the environment as possible career choices 2003 2006 $44,000
6. Restore and enhance local habitat 2003 2006 $67,000
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005FY 2006
$132,000$135,000$137,000$140,000

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2002 cost
Personnel FTE: 180 days @ $270/day $48,600
Fringe 30% of salary $14,000
Supplies Aquariums, water quality kits, associated materials $10,000
Travel 4 Teacher field trip transportation @ $500/trip=2,000 $2,000
Indirect 20% of personal line item $8,400
Subcontractor EcoNorthwest 400 hrs @ $50/hr $20,000
Other 50 substitutes @ $135/sub X 4 trips=27,000 $27,000
$130,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost$130,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2002 budget request$130,000
FY 2002 forecast from 2001$127,500
% change from forecast2.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fundable only if response is adequate
Date:
Jun 15, 2001

Comment:

Fundable if an adequate response is given to the ISRP's concerns. While the ISRP is in strong support of this program, a response is requested identifying the nature and results of the program evaluation that was conducted in 1998. This is a long-standing program that has apparently (based upon the presentation and supplemental materials that accompanied the presentation) established a good record of involving students of a variety of ages, teachers, and professionals from a variety of agencies and groups in environmental education. A strength is the combination of both field and in-class work. The program appears to have good continuity and outreach to students and teachers.

As mentioned in last year's review, this proposal should have provided more information on curriculum and that is needed in a response. A more specific listing/description of the curriculum would be helpful for reviewers to relate what is being taught relative to the objectives of the overall Yakima program (e.g., is the restoration program providing a useful context for environmental education?).

Since it has already operated for a number of years, the response should provide a brief assessment of the results to date, what has and has not worked well, and any changes needed in the future.

The use of $17,000 for a subcontractor (EcoNorthwest) needs further clarification.


Recommendation:
High Priority
Date:
Aug 3, 2001

Comment:

The urgency of this project is addressing public instruction to environmental issues in response to legislative action. The project indirectly promotes/maintains sustainable and/or ecosystem processes through education of future land stewards. Significant in-kind cost share is being provided by the BOR.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 10, 2001

Comment:

Fundable. The independent evaluation conducted in 1997 was very positive and it is clear from that document and the curriculum details provided that the project is an effort that all involved should be proud of. We suggest that another evaluation be conducted near the end of this funding cycle to document the effect of changes in the program and in the expectations of participants. A survey of non-participants should be conducted to identify possible barriers to participation and a plan for reducing those barriers should be proposed in future funding requests.
Recommendation:
Date:
Oct 1, 2001

Comment:

Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESU
N/A

Comments

Already ESA Req? N/A

Biop? no


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Jan 3, 2002

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 6, 2002

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:

On track
Recommendation:
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:

On track
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$135,000 $135,000 $135,000

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website