FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23006

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
23006 Narrative	Narrative
Eastside Pipeline Costs	Narrative Attachment
Figure 1: Walla Walla Subbasin w/Eastside Ditch Piping Project Location	Narrative Attachment

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Walla Walla River Flow Recruitment - Eastside Ditch Piping
Proposal ID	23006
Organization	Walla Walla Basin Watershed Council (WWBWC)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Brian Wolcott
Mailing address	P.O. Box 68 Milton-Freewater, OR 97862
Phone / email	5419382170 / walla2water@yahoo.com
Manager authorizing this project	Brian Wolcott, WWBWC Coordinator
Review cycle	FY 2001 High Priority
Province / Subbasin	Columbia Plateau / Walla Walla
Short description	This proposal will add 5 - 7 cfs of conserved and transferred irrigation water to the Walla Walla River at the critical flow-impaired reach between Milton-Freewater and the Oregon-Washington Stateline.
Target species	summer steelhead, bull trout, spring chinook

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description
46.0624	-118.9393	Walla Walla River

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

FY 2003	FY 2004	FY 2005	FY 2002
$7,000	$7,000	$7,000	$7,000

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

FY 2002	FY 2003	FY 2004	FY 2005
$900	$900	$900	$900

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 2001 cost
Capital	Pipe and fittings	$80,000
Subcontractor	pipe installation	$100,000
Other	administration/monitoring	$9,000
		$189,000

Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 cost	$189,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 2001 budget request	$189,000
FY 2001 forecast from 2000	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind
Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board	1/2 of pipe and pipe install., flowmeters, liners	$276,650	cash
Oregon Water Trust	water lease agreements	$6,000	in-kind
WWRID, landowners	design,construct,operate irrigation system	$72,900	in-kind
WWRID-SCM engineering	Design engineering paid by WWRID	$12,070	cash
Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board	administration	$13,832	cash
Walla Walla Basin Watershed Council	project coordination/promotion	$5,250	in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
ISRP Review

Recommendation:
C

Date:
Feb 1, 2001

Comment:

The proposal failed to adequately describe the biological situation, however, the project would likely benefit aquatic resources if its objectives are truly met and adhered to (i.e., enforced). Inadequate information was presented on the staff and their qualifications to conduct the proposed work. The project had good cost-sharing. A plus was the assurance provided that the water saved will receive legal protection and remain instream.

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
HP "A"

Date:
Feb 1, 2001

Comment:

This project should be closely coordinated with 23046.