FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23020
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 23020 Narrative | Narrative |
| Letter from R. Austin (BPA) to B. Franano (USFS) RE: Decision to defer contracting efforts for projects 23019 and 23020 | Correspondence |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Badger Creek Culvert Replacement and Road Closure Projects |
| Proposal ID | 23020 |
| Organization | U.S. Forest Service - Ochoco National Forest (USFS) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Barb Franano |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 490 Prineville, OR 97754 |
| Phone / email | 5414166485 / bfranano@fs.fed.us |
| Manager authorizing this project | Barb Franano |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / |
| Short description | Remove barriers to fish passage and mitigate degradation to water quality in the Deschutes River with placement of box culvert. |
| Target species | Steelhead Trout |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 44.45 | -120.12 | Badger Creek in Ochoco National Forest |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: .5 | $27,500 |
| Supplies | $14,000 | |
| Subcontractor | $45,500 | |
| $87,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $87,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $87,000 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| USFS | nepa | $3,500 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This is a very good proposal that meets most of the Council's criteria. The project is a continuation of Ochoco National Forest's efforts to remove barriers to fish passage and improve water quality and will open up 2 miles of fish habitat. The proposal provides direct on-the-ground benefits to ESA listed individuals in Badger Creek that flows to Mt. Creek to Rock Creek to the John Day River. The proposal includes good support by the Ochoco National Forest, is recommended by a Watershed Analysis, and long term O&M and M&E are apparently funded by the Ochoco National Forest. Furthermore, the project appears to be very economic for the benefits to be gained. However, the proposal does not provide stock status data or a map of the location of the effort. They should consider potential impacts on native resident stocks if any are present above the culverts.Comment:
The proposal was not coordinated with the tribe.