FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23037
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 23037 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Assessment of bull trout populations in the Columbia Basin (excluding the Columbia Gorge),WA. |
| Proposal ID | 23037 |
| Organization | Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Jim Uehara |
| Mailing address | 600 North Capitol Way Olympia, WA 98502 |
| Phone / email | 3609022738 / ueharjku@dfw.wa.gov |
| Manager authorizing this project | Ross Fuller |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Determine the status of bull trout populations in the Columbia Basin (excluding the Columbia Gorge). This will involve data collection to implement protection and recovery plans that are critical to bull trout survival. |
| Target species | Bull Trout |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2002 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $619,836 | $638,431 | $657,584 | $667,731 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: Bio. 3 8 months @ $4066 Bio. 2 48 months @ $3594 Tech. 2 48 months @ $2676 Program Support 5% | $350,162 |
| Fringe | @27% | $94,544 |
| Supplies | Four TV cameras $3,200 Ten dry suits $4,000 Ten pairs boots $1,500 | $8,700 |
| Travel | 4 4X4 trucks 1000 miles/mo each @ .40/mile | $19,200 |
| Indirect | 25 % overhead | $120,357 |
| Capital | Four backpack shockers $18,856 Four smolt traps $60,000 Four 4X4 trucks $120,000 | $198,796 |
| Office lease 12 monts @ $1460/mo for 4 offices | $17,520 | |
| $809,279 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $809,279 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $809,279 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding. This is basic survey work, which should be done.Comment: