FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23067
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
23067 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Compile and Digitize Oregon's Fish Screen and Culvert Data |
Proposal ID | 23067 |
Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Cedric Cooney |
Mailing address | 28655 HWY 34 Corvallis, Oregon 97333 |
Phone / email | 5417574263 / cooneyc@fsl.orst.edu |
Manager authorizing this project | Rick Kepler |
Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Deschutes |
Short description | Compile Oregon's fish screen and culvert inventory data into electronic databases and generate georeference data in order to make the information usable in a geographic information system. |
Target species | All fish species located in the target provinces in Oregon. |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
44.35 | -121 | Deschutes subbasin |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 0.5 | $16,800 |
Fringe | $6,720 | |
Travel | $300 | |
Indirect | 0.201 | $4,828 |
$28,648 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $28,648 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $28,648 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
ODFW | ODFW staff will input data throughout the State, including within the Columbia Basin however georeferencing is not funded by this effort. The amount is estimated since several ODFW staffers will input data for differing amounts of time. | $10,000 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal for data management does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding.Comment:
There appears to duplication and overlap with efforts that FSOC, StreamNet, and other NPPC assessments have already been funded to do. As a data collection effort it will not provide direct benefits.