FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23092
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
23092 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Genetic relationship of steelhead in North East Oregon |
Proposal ID | 23092 |
Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | James R. Ruzycki |
Mailing address | 211 Inlow Hall, EOU, One University Blvd. La Grande, OR 97850 |
Phone / email | 5419623777 / jruzycki@eou.edu |
Manager authorizing this project | Richard W. Carmichael |
Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
Province / Subbasin | Blue Mountain / Grande Ronde |
Short description | Determine genetic composition of steelhead in the Grande Ronde and Imnaha River basins. Define management units to develop future management plans and actions for endemic populations. |
Target species | Steelhead |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
45.52 | -117.76 | Grande Ronde subbasin |
45.52 | -117.76 | Imnaha subbasin |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $14,224 | |
Fringe | $5,743 | |
Supplies | $1,700 | |
Travel | $1,500 | |
Indirect | $6,163 | |
Subcontractor | $237,600 | |
$266,930 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $266,930 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $266,930 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
ODFW | personnel time for sampling, data entry, and analysis | $25,000 | cash |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal would provide information to develop future plans and actions and thus does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding.Comment:
As a study, this proposal would not provide direct benefits. This project will be funded under the Lower Snake River Compensation Plan.