FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23093
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 23093 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Evaluate the Feasibility of Modifying the Selah Moxee Irrigation Canal to Increase Water Available for Fish by 15,000 Acre Feet |
| Proposal ID | 23093 |
| Organization | Selah Moxee Irrigation District (SMID) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Ch2m Hill, Richard Haapala |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 2645 Yakima, WA 98907 |
| Phone / email | 5092489210 / haapala@ch2m.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | Gerald O. Helde |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / |
| Short description | Modification of the Selah Moxee Irrigation Canals to be totally piped will conserve water (more than 15,000 Acre feet) that can be used for streamflow augmentation during critical times of the spawning season and outmigration period |
| Target species | Yakima River spring chinook, coho, wild steelhead, bull trout |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 46.6053 | -120.4378 | Selah Moxee Irrigation Canal |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Subcontractor | Total will be subcontracted | $99,607 |
| $99,607 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $99,607 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $99,607 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal for a feasibility study does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding.Comment:
This project was not included in the initial CBFWA project review list.