FY 2001 Innovative proposal 22046
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 22046 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Deschutes Subbasin Stakeholder Facilitation - A Pilot Project Copyright October 30, 2000. TIGERS Success Series, PO Box 267, Bend, OR 97709. |
| Proposal ID | 22046 |
| Organization | TIGERS Success Series (TIGERS) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Dianne M. Crampton |
| Mailing address | PO Box 267 Bend, Oregon 97709 |
| Phone / email | 5413857465 / tigers@ucinet.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | Dianne M. Crampton |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Innovative |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Deschutes |
| Short description | Locally-driven facilitation of Deschutes Subbasin stakeholders that will create a process and template for local participation in the NWPPC's and Federal Agencies' Subbasin planning and habitat restoration efforts. |
| Target species | Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 44.35 | -121 | Deschutes subbasin |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 2 (1 fulltime facilitator/consultant and 3 part time support providers) | $60,900 |
| Supplies | telephone bills, packaging, equipment rental, recording equipment, lap top, facilitation supplies | $5,400 |
| Travel | Council and Stakeholder Community meetings | $2,700 |
| $69,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $69,000 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $69,000 |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIGERS | Office space, computers, printers, fax, e-mail services, phones | $12,000 | in-kind |
| Stakeholders | Meeting space, distribution lists, phone contacts, volunteer facilitators | $5,000 | in-kind |
| Council and BPA | Reports and briefing documents | $1,000 | in-kind |
| Information Providers | $3,000 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal to apply facilitation to stakeholder processes is not innovative. The project would develop a template for using stakeholder input in subbasin planning based on this pilot effort. This type of proposal probably should be submitted for general funding under the Fish and Wildlife Program.Comment:
Agree with ISRP comments.Comment:
Agree with ISRP comments.