FY 2001 Innovative proposal 200101100

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleHabitat Diversity in Alluvial Rivers
Proposal ID200101100
OrganizationConfederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameScott O'Daniel
Mailing address73239 Confederated Way Pendleton, OR. 97801
Phone / email5419662594 / scottodaniel@ctuir.com
Manager authorizing this projectRick George
Review cycleFY 2001 Innovative
Province / SubbasinColumbia Plateau / Umatilla
Short descriptionDeveloping innovative remote sensing and modeling tools for quantitative functional assessment of aquatic habitats by integrating spatialtemporal interactions between channels, floodplain and groundwater.
Target speciesAll aquatic organisms, including resident and anadramous fish.
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
45.85 -119.32 Umatilla River, near mouth
45.68 -118.75 Umatilla River
45.69 -118.45 Umatilla River
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Personnel $62,025
Fringe $15,967
Supplies $33,400
Travel $5,500
Indirect $36,758
Subcontractor # of tags: Leal Mertes, Associate Prof. University of California at Santa Barbara Geoffrey Poole, Ecometrics $166,210
$319,860
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$319,860
Total FY 2001 budget request$319,860
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
CTUIR GIS lab equiptment and system administration $15,700 in-kind
Bureau of Reclamation LIDAR flight $218,312 in-kind
EPA Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) Classification $50,755 cash

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
6; Yes - A
Date:
Dec 15, 2000

Comment:

This is judged as the best of the three innovative proposals that proposed to make use of LIDAR (airborne laser altimetry) data to obtain detailed habitat and physical information about streamside vegetation, channel cross-sections, and channel slopes. The vertical resolution has accuracy to tens of centimeters and can measure the height of vegetation with accuracy of horizontal resolutions in meters. See proposals 22049 and 22059. This proposal has a good interface of various fields of endeavor. It is well written, and clearly articulates how this detailed source of topographic and vegetation data would be used to assess connections between catchment hydrology, channel geomorphology, and ecological function. The proposal draws on past work in the Umatilla basin, and would be a collaboration of tribal, university, and state agency personnel. In addition to use of LIDAR data, stream temperature assessment and modeling would be facilitated through use of airborne infrared surveys, and the project would draw on other sources of remote sensing data (e.g., SRTM – Shuttle Radar Topography Mapping mission) available through one of the Co-Principal Investigator's NASA projects. The proposal is innovative in seeking to apply evolving remote sensing tools to habitat restoration projects within the basin. The panel was particularly impressed by the collaborative nature of the work, which should help assure that the work aids in transferring knowledge about data sources that should be of value in future projects.
Recommendation:
High Priority
Date:
Jan 17, 2001

Comment:

The proposal could be improved if more of a terrestrial scope is incorporated. The proposal should be modified to include a phase that focuses on the terrestrial species and processes.
Recommendation:
High Priority
Date:
Jan 17, 2001

Comment:

The proposal could be improved if more of a terrestrial scope is incorporated. The proposal should be modified to include a phase that focuses on the terrestrial species and processes.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Feb 8, 2001

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:

Project will be complete in FY04, innovative from 2001.
Recommendation:
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment: