FY 2002 Innovative proposal 34014

Additional documents

TitleType
34014 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleAssessing Potential Biological and Toxicological Effects of Parental Transfer of Environmental Contaminants to White Sturgeon in the Columbia River
Proposal ID34014
OrganizationOregon State University (OSU)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameMolly A.H. Webb
Mailing addressDept. Fish and Wildlife, 104 Nash Hall, Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331
Phone / email5417372463 / webbm@onid.orst.edu
Manager authorizing this projectMolly A.H. Webb
Review cycleFY 2002 Innovative
Province / SubbasinSystemwide / Systemwide
Short descriptionExamine the potential effects of environmental contaminants on white sturgeon reproduction. Explore the possibility of developing a tool by which to monitor the contaminant load passed onto white sturgeon progeny.
Target speciesWhite Surgeon
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
45.672 -121.8837 Below Bonneville Dam; unimpounded section of the Columbia River
45.6275 -121.1075 Bonneville Reservoir, Columbia River
45.9318 -119.2877 McNary Reservoir, Columbia River
45.9537 -118.9777 Lake Roosevelt
49.1 -117.7 Waneta Area, confluence of the Columbia and Pend d'Oreille Rivers
48.6848 -116.3092 Rock Creek, Kootenai River
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
1. Determine PCB concentrations in adult white sturgeon females in the Columbia River Basin a. Collect paired gonad and blood from adult white sturgeon females from 6 sites in the Columbia River Basin 4 $48,978
b. Analyze biological samples collected in Task 1a 3 $90,277 Yes
c. Determine if the PCB load in adult white sturgeon females is correlated with reproductive development and differs among sites in the Columbia River Basin 0.5 $4,640
2. Determine if the PCB load in female white sturgeon gametes may be assessed non-lethally a. Determine if a correlation exists between PCB concentrations in blood and ovarian tissue in white sturgeon females 0.5 $4,640
3. Determine if parental transfer of PCBs to offspring occurs in white sturgeon in the Columbia River Basin a. Determine PCB load in eggs, milt, and fertilized eggs from wild white sturgeon 3 $12,107
4. Determine if the parentally-transferred PCB load in white sturgeon offspring reduces fitness a. Examine cleavage patterns, embryo survival, time to and rate of hatch, hatch success, mortality associated with initiation to feeding, and body deformities in the full-sibs from Task 3 4 $38,358
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2002 cost
Personnel FTE: 1.36 $63,857
Fringe $29,828
Supplies assays (RIA, EIA), histology, chemicals, shipping costs, communications, bleeding supplies, jars $3,500
Travel $500
Indirect 41.5% $40,540
NEPA $0
Subcontractor Deke Gundersen at Pacific University for contaminant analysis $50,400
Indirect cost of first $25,000 of subcontract (41.5%) $10,375
$199,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost$199,000
Total FY 2002 budget request$199,000
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Washington Deparment of Fish and Wildlife boat and personnel to collect samples from adults below Bonneville Dam, in Bonneville Reservoir, and in McNary Reservoir $21,300 in-kind
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife boat and personnel to collect samples from adults in Bonneville Reservoir $11,500 in-kind
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission personnel and supplies to collect samples from adults in McNary Reservoir $12,500 in-kind
Spokane Tribe boat, personnel, and supplies to collect samples from adults in Lake Roosevelt $11,000 in-kind
B.C. Ministry of Environment boat, personnel, and supplies to collect samples from adults in the Waneta Area $17,000 in-kind
Kootenai Tribe boat, personnel, and supplies to collect samples from adults in the Kootenai River $17,500 in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
May 24, 2002

Comment:

Marginally innovative and not high priority. The proposal was carefully prepared and describes a project to assess whether PCBs occur in white sturgeon gonads and blood, to examine whether levels in these tissues are correlated so as to provide a non-lethal sampling tool, and to assess whether offspring of contaminated adults experience low growth, survival, or deformity. Methods described here appear to have been used elsewhere, with success. However, only one portion of this seemed innovative: objective 2, to assess possible non-lethal sampling of female gametes for PCBs. That objective was a relatively minor feature of the proposal.

The proposal may lead to some understanding of recruitment failure, but it offers little in the way of remediation, thus is mainly academic. Effort in reduction of contaminants is required. The proposal did not clearly discuss the results of considerable efforts underway on this topic in the last decade (i.e. WSCRPRG).


Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Jun 28, 2002

Comment:


Recommendation:
Date:
Jul 12, 2002

Comment:

Comments
Sturgeon project - not reviewed.

Already ESA Required?
No

Biop?
No


Recommendation:
Date:
Jul 12, 2002

Comment:

Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESU

Comments
Sturgeon Project - Not reviewed

Already ESA Req? No

Biop? No