FY 2003 Lower Columbia proposal 200001200

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleEvaluate factors limiting Columbia River gorge chum salmon populations.
Proposal ID200001200
OrganizationU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameNancy Uusitalo
Mailing address9317 Highway 99, Suite I Vancouver, WA 98665
Phone / email3606967605 / nancy_uusitalo@fws.gov
Manager authorizing this projectHoward Schaller
Review cycleLower Columbia
Province / SubbasinLower Columbia / Columbia Lower
Short descriptionEvaluate factors limiting chum salmon production in Hardy Creek, Hamilton Springs, and Columbia River side-channel.
Target speciesChum Salmon
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
45.6248 -122.0169 Mouth of Hardy Creek on Pierce Refuge.
45.6238 -122.0169 Mouth of Hamilton Creek on Pierce Refuge.
Beginning of Hamilton Spring Channel in town of North Bonneville.
45.63 -121.98 Side Channel of Columbia River adjacent to Pierce Refuge.
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA
Action 107
Action 150
Action 156
Action 157
Action 159
Action 160
Action 179
Action 193
Action 196
Action 197
Action 198
Action 1
Action 9
Action 13
Action 14
Action 15
Action 16
Action 17
Action 21
Action 27
Action 28
Action 30
Action 54
Action 60

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription
NMFS/BPA Action 155 NMFS BPA, working with BOR, the Corps, EPA, and USGS, shall develop a program to 1) identify mainstem habitat sampling reaches, survey conditions, describe cause-and- effect relationships, and identify research needs; 2) develop improvement plans for all mainstem reaches; and 3) initiate improvements in three mainstem reaches. Results shall be reported annually.
NMFS/BPA Action 156 NMFS The Action Agencies and NMFS shall study the feasibility (including both biological benefits and ecological risks) of habitat modification to improve spawning conditions for chum salmon in the Ives Island area.
NMFS Action 107 NMFS The Action Agencies shall conduct a comprehensive evaluation to assess survival of adult salmonids migrating upstream and factors contributing to unaccounted losses.
NMFS Action 180 NMFS The Action Agencies and NMFS shall work within regional prioritization and congressional appropriation processes to establish and provide the level of FCRPS funding to develop and implement a basinwide hierarchical monitoring program. This program shall be developed collaboratively with appropriate regional agencies and shall determine population and environmental status (including assessment of performance measures and standards) and allow ground-truthing of regional databases. A draft program including protocols for specific data to be collected, frequency of samples, and sampling sites shall be developed by September 2001. Implementation should begin no later than the spring of 2002 and will be fully implemented no later than 2003.
BPA Action 156 NMFS The Action Agencies and NMFS shall study the feasibility (including both biological benefits and ecological risks) of habitat modification to improve spawning conditions for chum salmon in the Ives Island area.
BPA Action 157 NMFS BPA shall fund actions to improve and restore tributary and mainstem habitat for CR chum salmon in the reach between The Dalles Dam and the mouth of the Columbia River.
NMFS/BPA Action 180 NMFS The Action Agencies and NMFS shall work within regional prioritization and congressional appropriation processes to establish and provide the level of FCRPS funding to develop and implement a basinwide hierarchical monitoring program. This program shall be developed collaboratively with appropriate regional agencies and shall determine population and environmental status (including assessment of performance measures and standards) and allow ground-truthing of regional databases. A draft program including protocols for specific data to be collected, frequency of samples, and sampling sites shall be developed by September 2001. Implementation should begin no later than the spring of 2002 and will be fully implemented no later than 2003.

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
2000 Produced abundance estimates and determined biological characteristics of adult chum returns to Hardy Creek and Hamilton Springs for 1999 spawning year.
2000 Produced abundance estimates and determined biological characteristics of juvenile chum emigrants from Hardy Creek and Hamilton Springs in 2000.
2000 Determined characterisitcs of areas used for spawning and egg incubation by chum salmon, including intragravel water chemistry, during 1999-2000.
2000 Evaluated movements of adult chum salmon between spawning areas in Hardy Creek, Hamilton Creek, Hamilton Springs, and Columbia River in 1999.
2000 Constructed a chum salmon spawning channel adjacent to Hardy Creek on Pierce National Wildlife Refuge.
2001 Produced abundance estimates of adult chum salmon returns in Hardy Creek and Hamilton Springs for 2000 spawning year.
2001 Evaluated movements of adult chum salmon between spawning areas in Hardy Creek, Hardy Creek spawning channel, Hamilton Creek, Hamilton Springs, and Columbia River in 2000.
2001 Produced abundance estimates of juvenile chum salmon emigrants in Hardy Creek and Hamilton Springs in 2001.
2001 Evaluated substrate in Hardy Creek and Hamilton Springs.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2003 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2003 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2003 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2003 costSubcontractor
1. Assess movement of adults among three spawning areas. a. Capture and radio tag chum salmon and evaluate movements between spawning areas. 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 $18,039
b. Establish fixed station telemetry arrays and provide telemetry technical assistance (USGS-BRD-CRRL subcontract). 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 $2,673 Yes
c. Capture and radio tag chum salmon at Bonneville Dam (WDFW cost-share). 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 $0
2. Determine abundance and baseline biological characteristics of adult chum salmon. a.Install and operate weirs in Hardy Creek, Hardy Creek spawning channel, and Hamilton Springs. 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 $56,100
b. Conduct spawning ground surveys in Hardy Creek and Hamilton Springs to determine spawning success. 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 $11,000
c. Conduct spawning ground surveys in Hamilton Creek (WDFW cost-share). 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 $0
d. Measure subsample of eggs to determine ratio of female length to number of eggs and egg size. 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 $12,600
3. Determine chum smolt production and abundance in Hardy Creek, Hardy Creek spawning channel, Hamilton Springs, and main stem Columbia River near Ives Island. a. Install fyke nets in Hamilton Springs, Hardy Creek, and Hardy Creek spawning channel and evaluate abundance by mark-recapture techniques (USFWS cost-share). 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 $0
b. Install screw trap in Columbia River to evaluate smolt abundance by mark-recapture techniques. 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 $89,400
c. Evaluate homing fidelity by uniquely marking smolts with a strontium solution in Hamilton Springs and Hardy Creek. 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 $4,800
4. Evaluate habitat parameters associated with chum salmon spawning success. a. Monitor intragravel water quality near redds at egg pocket depth using piezometers. 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 $26,300
b. Install redd caps in Hamilton Springs to determine swim-up timing and temperature unit requirements for egg incubation. 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 $34,300
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
1. Assess movement of adults among three spawning areas. 2004 2007 $93,732
2. Determine abundance and baseline biological characteristics of adult chum salmon. 2004 2007 $360,691
3. Determine chum smolt production and abundance in Hardy Creek, Hardy Creek spawning channel, Hamilton Springs, and main stem Columbia River near Ives Island. 2004 2007 $426,313
4. Evaluate habitat parameters associated with chum salmon spawning success. 2004 2007 $274,253
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2006FY 2007
$267,972$281,371$295,440$310,212

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2003 cost
Personnel FTE: 1 Supervisory Biologist (33%), 2 Field Biologists (100%) 2 Temporary Biologists (50%) $130,091
Fringe 30% $39,027
Supplies $10,128
Travel Vehicle and boat lease $10,000
Indirect 24.8% $63,293
Subcontractor USGS $2,673
$255,212
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2003 cost$255,212
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2003 budget request$255,212
FY 2003 forecast from 2002$262,283
% change from forecast-2.7%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
WDFW Capture and radio tag chum salmon at Bonneville Dam. $78,200 in-kind
WDFW Conduct spawning ground surveys in Hamilton Creek. $10,500 in-kind
USGS Radio telemetry receivers, antennas. cable, batteries, and technical assistance. $115,000 in-kind
University of Idaho Radio Tags $17,500 in-kind
USFWS Fyke nets, screw traps, and biometric services. $132,086 in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fundable - no response required
Date:
Mar 1, 2002

Comment:

Fundable. The proposal is sound and well organized with logical objectives, and should generate information useful for protecting these remnant chum salmon in the Lower Columbia. The viability of these populations may be affected by movements among them, lending importance to the proposed study of movements. A summary of censuses of adults is given but no summary of fry production.
Recommendation:
High Priority
Date:
May 17, 2002

Comment:

NMFS has identified that this project is a BiOp project.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Jun 7, 2002

Comment:

Fundable. A response was not needed. The proposal is sound and well organized with logical objectives, and should generate information useful for protecting these remnant chum salmon in the Lower Columbia. The viability of these populations may be affected by movements among them, lending importance to the proposed study of movements. A summary of censuses of adults is given but no summary of fry production.
Recommendation:
Date:
Jul 19, 2002

Comment:

Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESU
This is an important element of studies in the Ives Island area to understand the effects of FCRPS flow management on productivity of the Bonneville chum population. Supports long-term habitat restoration of chum habitat and short and long-term survival of this ESU.

Comments
This is an important project that will result in a better understanding of FCRPS flow management on productivity of the Bonneville chum population. Fulfills Biop requirements in part.

Already ESA Req? No

Biop? Yes


Recommendation:
A
Date:
Jul 23, 2002

Comment:

Recommend to implement RPAs 156 and 157.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Oct 30, 2002

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Apr 30, 2003

Comment:

Fund as Recommended and to implement RPA 155, 156
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:

Sponsor surprised at how low accrual is, project should be pretty much in line for 2003. Changes in personnel costs and benefits, similar to lamprey project in terms of needs.
Recommendation:
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:

The reason for requested increase is due to changes in personnel, cost of living adjustments and equipment replacement.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$263,888 $263,888 $263,888

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website