FY 2003 Mainstem/Systemwide proposal 200307300

Additional documents

TitleType
35011 Narrative Narrative
35011 Sponsor Response to the ISRP Response

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleThe Floating Net Pen Transportation System Pilot Project
Proposal ID200307300
OrganizationColumbia Basin Fishery Restoration L.L.C. (CBFR LLC)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameFred Simmons
Mailing address2027 Narrows View Circle NW. E-243 Gig Harbor, Washington, 98335
Phone / email2538532004 / williestrong@earthlink.net
Manager authorizing this projectWilliam Strong
Review cycleMainstem/Systemwide
Province / SubbasinMainstem/Systemwide /
Short descriptionThe transportation of Chinook salmon smolts in floating net pens from various fish hatcheries and collector systems ,to be released at the mouth of the Columbia River or in the Pacific Ocean.
Target speciesSpring/Summer Chinook Salmon
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Columbia River Basin Mainstem System Wide
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA
41
42
47
49
53

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
Not Applicable

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
This pilot project will stand on it's own merit and it's success will be based on the overall performance.of the project.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2003 costSubcontractor
1. Engineering and Design a. Design skeleton float 2003 $35,000 Yes
b. Design net pen frame and nets 2003 $25,000 Yes
c. Design raceway for salmon fry 2003 $40,000 Yes
2. Analysis and program design a.Meet with agencies for requirements and responsibilities. 2003 $75,000
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2003 costSubcontractor
1.Construction of Skeleton Floats a.Construct 2003 $406,250 Yes
2. Construction of Net Pen Frames a.Construct 2003 $358,625 Yes
3. Nets for Net Pens a. Purchase 2003 $45,000
4. Vessels for transportation a. Purchase 2003 $250,000
b.Fitting vessels for transportation 2003 $75,000 Yes
5. Vehicles Company Transportation a.Purchase 2003 $110,000
6. Receive juvenile salmon smolts and rearing a.Purchace from Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife 2003 $112,000 Yes
7. Smolt food a. Purchase 2003 $5,000
8. Vessel Fuel for transport of smolts a. Purchase 2003 $86,400
9. Install raceways a. Construct 2003 $95,000 Yes
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
1. Receive juvenile salmon smolts and rearing 2004 2007 $448,000
2. Smolt food 2004 2007 $20,000
3. Vessel Fuel for tranport of smolts 2004 2007 $380,000
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2006FY 2007
$203,400$203,400$203,400$203,400

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2003 costSubcontractor
1. Administative and Management Personal a. Compensation 2003 $591,000
2.Operational and Technical Personal a.Compensation 2003 $266,000
3. Contract with Universities a.University of Washington 2003 $62,000 Yes
b.Oregon State University 2003 $62,000 Yes
c.University of Idaho 2003 $62,000 Yes
4. Office space and equipment a. Rent office space 2003 $25,000
b. Purchase equipment 2003 $25,000
5. Maintenance of Equipment a.Vessels and Floating Net Pens 2003 $75,000 Yes
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
1.Administrative and Management Personal 2004 2007 $2,364,000
2. Operational and Technical Personal 2004 2007 $1,064,000
3. Contracts with Universities 2004 2007 $744,000
4. Maintance of Equipment 2004 2007 $300,000
5. Office Space Rent 2004 2007 $100,000
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2006FY 2007
$1,118,000$1,118,000$1,118,000$1,118,000

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2003 costSubcontractor
1.Coded-wire tags Transported Groups 50,000 fish per group and 4 groups a.Tag Salmon smolts 2003 $160,000 Yes
2. Coded-wire-tags Inriver Groups 50,000 fish per group and 4 groups a.Tag Salmon smolts 2003 $160,000 Yes
3. Project reporting and prentation a. Provide written reports of actual tranportaion data. 2003 $35,000
4.Report distribution a. Supply documentation upon request 2003 $50,000
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
1. Tag trasnported and inriver groups with coded-wire-tags 2004 2007 $1,440,000
2. Project reporting and distribution 2004 2007 $160,000
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2006FY 2007
$405,000$405,000$405,000$405,000

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2003 cost
Personnel FTE: 13 $645,000
Fringe $212,000
Supplies $226,400
Travel $75,000
Indirect $0
Capital $405,000
NEPA Categorical exclusion (CX) $0
Subcontractor 1. Industial Plastic Inc. Design and construct skeleton float and net pen frames $824,875
Subcontractor 2. Design raceways and construct to be determined $135,000
Subcontractor 3.Fitting vessels for transportation to be determined $75,000
Subcontractor 4. Washington Depatment of Fish and Wildlife $432,000
Subcontractor 5.University of Washington $62,000
Subcontractor 6.Oregon State University $62,000
Subcontractor 7. University of Idaho $62,000
Subcontractor 8.Maintance of Equipment to be determined $75,000
$3,291,275
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2003 cost$3,291,275
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2003 budget request$3,291,275
FY 2003 forecast from 2002$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Do not fund - no response required
Date:
Aug 2, 2002

Comment:

Not fundable. The experimental design is not technically sufficient. The proposal does not specify what benefits might be expected from use of net pens relative to existing methods of transportation of juvenile salmon, nor how any such benefits would be obtained or measured. Neither the need for transfer nor the method to be used for transfer of fish from hatchery raceways or other sources to the net pens is discussed in the proposal.

The reviewers are aware of an experiment on gas bubble trauma conducted by Earl Dawley that employed net pens in the Columbia River. Dawley couldn't keep the net pens together. The proposers should review that experiment.

Action Agency/NMFS RME Group Comments:

OCEAN AND ESTUARY SUBGROUP -- Potential action items addressed - 187; 195. The artificial transportation aspect of this proposal is not in concert with the habitat restoration efforts and proposed research on ecosystem function of the lower river and estuary currently being conducted by LCREP, NMFS, and others.

ISRP Remarks on RME Group Comments:

The RME Group comments are descriptive. There is no conflict between the ISRP and RME Group comments.


Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Oct 24, 2002

Comment:

The proposal is technically inadequate, and does not clearly demonstrate the proposed approach would solve or alleviate current transportation issues. For example, the proposers expect improved imprinting and improved homing response through the use of net pens. Transportation would have to originate in rearing or nursery areas to achieve this outcome, and methods to collect and transport juveniles from nursery areas are not presented. As proposed, the project would only investigate transportation in the Columbia River from a single hatchery.
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Nov 5, 2002

Comment:

Do Not Fund; agree with CBFWA. The proposal is incomplete. While the response attempts to deal with many of the comments by the ISRP, it still falls short of being adequate to accomplish its stated objective, "Net pens are proposed as a low cost alternative to the present system of transporting molts in the Columbia River.", page 1 of the response. No method is described for comparing the performance (survival or return rates) of fish transported in net pens with those transported "in the present system".
Recommendation:
Date:
Jan 21, 2003

Comment:

Statement of Potential Biological Benefit
Potentially increases the survival of transported fish by providing more natural migration conditions through the use of net pens rather than barges. This may allow the transported fish to obtain better directional preference.

Comments
This proposal has little potential biological benefit. The use of net pens as an appropriate transport vessel is very questionable. The pens are unlikely to maintain rigidity and there would be concerns about the ability of the transported fish to keep pace with the pen's movement. The concept has many potential shortcomings that probably outweigh the benefits.

Already ESA Required?
No

Biop?
No


Recommendation:
Do Not Fund (Tier 3)
Date:
Jun 11, 2003

Comment:

Category:
3. Other projects not recommended by staff

Comments: