FY 2003 Mainstem/Systemwide proposal 198907201
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
198907201 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Independent Scientific Advisory Board Support |
Proposal ID | 198907201 |
Organization | Department of Energy/Oak Ridge National Laboratory (DOE/ORNL) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Charles C. Coutant |
Mailing address | ORNL/ESD/ PO Box 2008/Bldg. 1505: Mail Stop 6036 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6036 |
Phone / email | 8655766830 / coutantcc@ornl.gov |
Manager authorizing this project | Mike Schiewe (NMFS), Chip McConnaha (NPPC) |
Review cycle | Mainstem/Systemwide |
Province / Subbasin | Mainstem/Systemwide / |
Short description | Provide support through contract with DOE for Dr. Charles Coutant for the Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB), for scientific advice to the NWPPC’s FWP, NMFS's ESA program, and the Columbia River Basin Indian Tribes fish and wildlife programs. |
Target species | na |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
na |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
2002 | Completion of one review to date: Review of Council briefing document, "Mainstem Passage Strategies in the Columbia River System: Transportation, Spill, and Flow Augmentation." Also working on Supplementation and Tributary Habitat reviews. |
2001 | Completed 7 reviews including reviews of salmon recovery strategies, the role of hatchery surplus, models (PATH, CRI, EDT, ICBEMP, COHORT), Lower Snake River flow augmentation studies, emergency spill, and 2000 FWP biological objectives. |
2000 | Completed 5 reviews including reviews of Council's Artificial Production Review performance standards, The Dalles spill research program, and the impact of estuary conditions on the FWP. Conducted most of Model Synthesis Review (2001). |
1999 | Completion of 7 reviews requested by NMFS, the Council, and Congress including review of the Corps Capital Construction Program (adult passage and scientific overview), a scientific synthesis of recovery plans, and NMFS's Anadromous Fish Appendix. |
1998 | Completion of 8 reviews requested by NMFS, the Council, and Congress including review of the Corps Capital Construction Program, PIT tag workplan, and the Multi-Species Framework Scientific Principles. |
1997 | Completion of 8 reviews requested by NMFS and the Council including reviews of downstream passage for salmon, PIT tag research, NMFS Waiver of Dissolved Gas Standard, ecological impacts of BiOp flow provisions on Hungry Horse and Libby resident fishes. |
1996 | Review of the Fish and Wildlife Program. The Council Report 96-6 by Independent Scientific Group: Return to the River. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
199600500 | Independent Scientific Advisory Board | This project is to fund Dr. Coutant's participation in the ISAB. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1) Provide scientific review and recommendations to the Council, NMFS, and Columbia River Basin Indian Tribes as requested. | 3 | $100,027 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|---|---|---|
1) Provide scientific review and recommendations to the Council, NMFS, and Columbia River Basin Indian Tribes as requested. | 2003 | 2005 | $300,000 |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
---|---|
$100,000 | $100,000 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
na | na | na | $0 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2003 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 446 hrs x $78.75 | $35,122 |
Fringe | 47.85% | $16,806 |
Travel | 11 trips @ $135/day @ 4 days per trip; $1,800 airfare/travel Oak Ridge, TN to Portland or Seattle | $25,740 |
Indirect | General and Administrative Expense; 41.63% for labor; 2.88% for travel. | $22,359 |
$100,027 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2003 cost | $100,027 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2003 budget request | $100,027 |
FY 2003 forecast from 2002 | $100,000 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Not applicable - no response required
Aug 2, 2002
Comment:
Not applicable, conflict of interest.Comment:
Comment:
Not applicable, conflict of interest.Comment:
Statement of Potential Biological BenefitIndirect benefit through scientific review of all proposals submitted under the Fish and Wildlife Program
Comments
The ISRP function is legislatively mandated.
Already ESA Required?
No
Biop?
No
Comment:
Category:3. Other projects not recommended by staff
Comments:
Placeholder
Comment: