FY 1999 proposal 9004

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
9004 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Restore/Enhance Trout Creek @ Ashwood Phase I
Proposal ID	9004
Organization	Jefferson County Soil & Water Conservation District for Trout Creek Watershed Council (JCSWCD)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Marie Horn
Mailing address	243 SW 3rd St. Madras, OR 97741
Phone / email	5414753144 /
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycle	FY 1999
Province / Subbasin	Lower Mid-Columbia / Deschutes
Short description	Stablize Streambanks, Improve water quality/quantity
Target species

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description
9366	NE Or. Screens/Passage	Trout CreekWatershed plan
940200	T.C. Habitat Restoration	Trout Creek Watershed plan
9303000	Buckhollow W.Enhancement	Basin plan
9405400	Bull Trout Studies C/NE Org.	Stock status

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 1999 cost
Personnel	Project Manager	$4,800
Capital	Camera: photo points (before & after records	$400
Travel	Project manager	$1,200
Indirect	clerical support: telephone, copying, postage, film/developing	$2,400
Subcontractor		$48,000
		$56,800

Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 cost	$56,800
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 1999 budget request	$56,800
FY 1999 forecast from 1998	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: None foreseen

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Watershed Technical Group Comments

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

See 9003

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Fund (low priority)

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

See 9005

REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)

Recommendation:
Inadequate

Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

Is there a watershed analysis that indicates the work described in these proposals (9003 and 9004) is needed? If so, it should be presented. The proposals do not include a description of the results of past habitat projects. The budget is very high for the size of restoration area described. The proposal should describe its relationship to other habitat restoration projects in Trout Creek.