FY 1999 proposal 9005

Additional documents

TitleType
9005 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleIrrigation System Replacement Trout Cr. @ Willowdale II 1999 Funds
Proposal ID9005
OrganizationJefferson County Soil & Water Conservation District for Trout Creek Council (JCSWCD)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameMarie Horn
Mailing address243 SW 3rd St. Madras, OR 97741
Phone / email5414753144 /
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Mid-Columbia / Deschutes
Short descriptionDecrease sedimentation and stream disturbance, Improve water quality/quantity, by replacing push-up dams with a infiltration sump/pump system.
Target speciesSteelhead, Redband Trout
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
9366 NE Or. Screens/Passage Trout Cr. Watershed Plan
94022 T.C.Habitat Restoration Trout Creek Watershed Plan
9303000 Buckhollow Enhancement Basin Plan
9405400 Bull Trout Studies C/NE Or. Stock Status

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel Project manager $2,000
Indirect Clerical support, telephone, film/developing, etc. $1,750
Subcontractor $25,000
$28,750
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$28,750
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$28,750
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: none foreseen


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Technical Issue: Explain why the objectives are the same as 9006 except for reducing push-up dams. Describe more detail, how many push-up dams to be eliminated.

Technical Issue: Need to clearly describe the existing resource condition and critical limiting factors, measurable objectives, strategic actions and expected results, and the methods for monitoring to determine if the expected results are being achieved and how the project is adaptable based on the monitoring results.

Management Issue: Request that ODFW and CTWSR assist the project sponsor with project coordination and especially with proposal development because the proposal is difficult to review as written. This applies also to 9003, 9004, and 9006.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Include 9003, 9004, & 9006
Recommendation:
Inadequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This proposal lacks specific information about the stream, the habitat, and the methods used to improve the habitat. Protection of fish and wildlife is not well described.