FY 1999 proposal 9010

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
9010 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Assess Fish Habitat & Salmonids in Walla Walla Watershed in Washington
Proposal ID	9010
Organization	Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Glen Mendel
Mailing address	401 S Cottonwood St. Dayton, WA 99328
Phone / email	5093821005 / snakeriv@dfw.wa.gov
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycle	FY 1999
Province / Subbasin	Lower Mid-Columbia / Walla Walla
Short description	To determine fish passage, rearing and spawning conditions for steelhead and potential reintroduction of salmon, and to assess steelhead & bull trout distribution, densities, genetic composition in Walla Walla watershed.
Target species	Mid-Columbia River Natural Steelhead, Wild Bull Trout

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 1999 cost
Personnel		$71,166
Fringe		$20,282
Supplies		$54,325
Travel		$7,640
Indirect		$26,859
Subcontractor		$3,520
		$183,792

Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 cost	$183,792
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 1999 budget request	$183,792
FY 1999 forecast from 1998	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: ESA listings of bull trout and/or steelhead may delay scheduled activities until ESA permits are obtained, or listings may require modifications to proposed actions to reduce potential impacts to listed species. High flows in area streams may require delay of monitoring devices until flows subside in May or June.

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Watershed Technical Group Comments

Recommendation:
Pass (Fundable)

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Management Issue: Need to address whether the coordination ends at the state line.

Technical Issue: Describe how this proposal relates to both the analysis and implementation activities in the headwater tributaries in Oregon?

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Fund

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)

Recommendation:
Adequate

Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This proposal lacks specific detail on the river, its fisheries, temperature, sediment and other environmental conditions. The methods section is too general and needs more detail. They state they are going to use instream flow incremental method (IFIM) but do not acknowledge the limitations of this method.