FY 1999 proposal 9012

Additional documents

TitleType
9012 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleMitigate Effects of Runoff & Erosion on Salmonid Habitat in Pine Hollow
Proposal ID9012
OrganizationPine Hollow Watershed Council, c/o Sherman Soil and Water Conservation District (Sherman SWCD)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameJeff Hopkins-Clark
Mailing addressP.O. Box 405 Moro, OR 97039
Phone / email5415653216 / scswcd@transport.com
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Mid-Columbia / John Day
Short descriptionPhase 1 will implement practices to reduce erosion and flooding, allowing active and natural recovery of riparian vegetation and channel type. Phase 2 will focus on replanting or protecting critical areas within the stream corridor.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel 3 people, ~1/2 FTE, total value ~$12,000. BPA share: 18%, Other Sources: GWEB, ODA, Sherman County $2,117
Fringe Total value, $3000, Other info as above $529
Operating 100% provided by landowners $0
Capital Memory Upgrade: $85, Speed upgrade, $99, and hard drive upgrade, $224 $413
Subcontractor Landowners hire contractors to complete their work. They then submit a $23,901
$26,960
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$26,960
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$26,960
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Engineering assistance from NRCS is limited. Riparian work will not be started until upland work is completed. The main constraint to riparian recovery is excessive peak flows. Completion of upland runoff control work may be considered a milestone.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Pass (Fundable)
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Good demonstration of cost sharing, and landowner involvement.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:


Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This proposal does a good job of addressing both fish and wildlife needs. It brings together a diverse group of interests. Monitoring data should be reported (published) not just stored in files. The proposal needs to clearly describe the results of watershed assessments, potential downstream effects of the project, and connection to other projects in basin.