FY 1999 proposal 9018

Additional documents

TitleType
9018 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleAssess Habitat for Anadromous Fish Upriver of Chief Joseph Dam
Proposal ID9018
OrganizationColville Confederated Tribes (CCT)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameChristopher J. Fisher
Mailing addressP.O. Box 862 Omak, WA 98841
Phone / email5096348689 / anadromo@televar.com
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinUpper Columbia / Upper Columbia Mainstem
Short descriptionConduct surveys to determine the quantity and quality of spawning and rearing habitat for anadromous fish between Chief Joseph Dam and Grand Coulee Dam. Investigate the feasibility of providing passage for adult/juvenile fish through Chief Joseph Dam.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
none

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel 2 Full time employees; 1 Seasonal employee $75,000
Fringe 30% of salary (based on 1997 or 1998 figures) $22,500
Supplies miscellaneous $2,000
Operating Fuel, vehicle servicing, outboard fuel and servicing $2,000
Capital none $0
Tag none $0
Travel Updates and presentations $1,000
Indirect 39.2% of salary (based on 1997 figures) $29,400
Subcontractor none $40,000
$171,900
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$171,900
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$171,900
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: No schedule constraints are expected.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Comments:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Incomplete This project is inappropriately designated as a Flow/survival project type. It is primarily a watershed project and should so indicate. Difficult to evaluate because criteria are insufficient to fully evaluate watershed projects.

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Incomplete Lacks sufficient detail to judge whether criterion is met.

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Incomplete Lacks sufficient detail to judge whether criterion is met.

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Incomplete Lacks sufficient detail to judge whether criterion is met.


Recommendation:
Fund (low priority)
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Budget constraints. Proposal was found to be technically sound and appropriate but was deferred because other work was judged more urgent and funds were not adequate for all needed work.
Recommendation:
Inadequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This proposal is not adequately related to other projects. It is a good idea to get long-term natural production in the river but methods to accomplish objectives are not adequately described.