Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Enforcement of ESA Laws on the Duck Valley Indian Reservation |
| Proposal ID | 9023 |
| Organization | Shoshone-Paiute Tribes (SPT) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Guy Dodson Sr. |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 219 Owyhee, NV 89832 |
| Phone / email | 2087593246 / |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Upper Snake / Owyhee |
| Short description | To assist the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes in the development of a law enforcement/training program in order to protect the threatened and endangered wildlife on the Duck Valley Indian Reservation. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$40,000 |
| Supplies |
|
$15,000 |
| Capital |
|
$10,000 |
| Travel |
|
$8,000 |
| Indirect |
|
$19,500 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$0 |
| $92,500 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $92,500 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $92,500 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Constraints may be securing a qualified Conservation Officer to work on the Reservation. Also, the lack of historical funding for wildlife may present a problem.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Does not meet threshold criterion D
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Project 9023, Enforcement of ESA Laws on the Duck Valley Indian Reservation appears to be inconsistent with threshold criteria D, "Does this project impose on Bonneville the funding responsibilities of others, as prohibited by the Northwest Power Act?"
Recommendation:
Inadequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This proposal is not technically complete. The objectives and planned activities are not well described. Enforcement or better enforcement may very well be needed, but this proposal presents no solid justification for it. It is not clear how the proposed work would be implemented or evaluated.