Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Prevent Mortality in Methow Endangered and Proposed Fish |
Proposal ID | 9025 |
Organization | USDA Forest Service, Okanogan National Forest, Methow Valley Ranger District (USFS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | Ardis Bynum |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 97 Winthrop, WA 98862 |
Phone / email | 5099964004 / fsinfo@methow.com |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Upper Mid-Columbia / Methow |
Short description | Replace (lethal) fish screen with adequate, safe screen |
Target species | |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
0 |
None |
|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
Personnel |
overseer, and some labor |
$5,500 |
Supplies |
fish screen and installation supplies |
$14,000 |
Subcontractor |
competitive bid |
$5,500 |
| $25,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $25,000 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $25,000 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Extreme high water would delay the project start date
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Pass (Fundable)
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Management Issue: Management concern that this is an in-lieu problem because it's the USFS' responsibility to fund.Management Issue: Explain if non-screen alternatives were considered (e.g., an infiltration pump, or closing the diversion entirely).
Recommendation:
Fund (low priority)
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
In-lieu funding issue. Proposed tasks appear to be "in lieu of other expenditures authorized or required from other entities under other agreements or provisions of law". (Section 4.(h)(10)(A) of PNW Power Act).
Recommendation:
Inadequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This proposal contained inadequate technical justification, no information on monitoring, and no linkage to the Fish and Wildlife Plan.