FY 1999 proposal 9031

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
9031 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Implement Entiat Model Watershed Plan
Proposal ID	9031
Organization	Chelan County Conservation District (CCCD)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Peggy Entzel, Office Manager
Mailing address	301 Yakima St., Rm. 301 Wenatchee, WA 98801
Phone / email	5096640265 / pentzel@wenat.wawenatche.fsc.usda.gov
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycle	FY 1999
Province / Subbasin	Upper Mid-Columbia / Entiat
Short description	Build 60 instream habitat structures and plant 12,177 m of riparian vegetation along private lands of the Entiat River as part of the Model Watershed Plan.
Target species

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 1999 cost
Personnel		$7,900
Fringe		$1,185
Supplies		$138,000
Travel		$372
Indirect		$2,000
Subcontractor		$50,171
		$199,628

Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 cost	$199,628
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 1999 budget request	$199,628
FY 1999 forecast from 1998	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Watershed Technical Group Comments

Recommendation:
Pass (Fundable)

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Technical Issue: Explain if alternatives other than in-stream flows were considered.

Technical Issue: Describe what the rock is for.

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Fund (low priority)

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Need better explanation of expected benefits

REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)

Recommendation:
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose

Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This proposal mentions the Entiat River watershed analysis but does not provide criteria for selecting sites for instream or riparian structural improvements. This area is in the stages of post wildfire recovery and active habitat improvement could be justified, but the proposal does not describe this. The objectives and monitoring are weak. The technical justification is not well described. General management plans are better described than the specific project.