FY 1999 proposal 9032

Additional documents

TitleType
9032 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleTeach Adults to Become Holistic Master Watershed Stewards
Proposal ID9032
OrganizationWashington Governor's Council on Environmental Education (GCEE)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameBeverly Isenson, Special Assistant, GCEE
Mailing addressP.O. Box 40900 Olympia, WA 98504-0900
Phone / email3604077317 / BeverlyI@Parks.wa.gov
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Mid-Columbia / Yakima
Short descriptionTeach/train adults to work as Master Watershed Stewards in their watersheds, focus on science, community organization, leadership skills to increase community capacity to address fish/wildlife/water issues. Students provide at least 50 hrs community srvc.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $37,080
Fringe $12,257
Supplies $9,270
Travel $2,060
Indirect $21,124
Subcontractor $0
$81,791
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$81,791
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$81,791
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Identify any constraints that may cause schedule changes. Describe major milestones if necessary. Milestones: Course completed, stewards perform community service.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Pass (Fundable)
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Management Issue: Still appears that there is some room to improve coordination with the watershed groups and the other education project (9405900).
Recommendation:
Fund (low priority)
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Not urgent. Proposed activities would not produce significant near-term survival improvement nor risk a lost opportunity within the next 1-3 years.

Questionable management value. Proposal was either incomplete but did not provide adequate information to determine whether management criteria were met or complete but did not meet critical management criteria.


Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This proposal should receive additional review by educational specialists. The proposal is innovative and involves significant coordination and collaboration among many key land use and resource managers. The goals are worthwhile. The proposal has a scientific focus but does not reference scientific papers and does not adequately detail the curriculum. It should include monitoring to determine how well the individuals are being educated and what they are doing with this knowledge.