FY 1999 proposal 9034

Additional documents

TitleType
9034 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleReduce Sediment Delivery From Kline Mountain Road to the S.F. Salmon River.
Proposal ID9034
OrganizationUSDA Forest Service, Boise National Forest, Cascade Ranger District (USFS, BNF, Cascade RD)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameJennie Fischer
Mailing addressP.O. Box 696 Cascade, ID 83611
Phone / email2083827452 /
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Snake / Salmon
Short description Reduce sediment along, #474 Road, by utilizing the most cost effecive methods, while keeping the road open to the public. Obilterate the bypass road and restore the wetland. Stabilize and perform minor reconstruction improvements along the #427 Road. .
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
n/a

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel Contract prep & administration, planting $33,545
Supplies Native vegetation, road closure signs $955
Subcontractor USFS; Contractors $272,542
$307,042
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$307,042
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$307,042
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Contract preparation and awarding process by the USFS is the largest constraint.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision*
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Technical Issue: Benefits appear very small – explain how much sediment is there and where it comes from compared to the total South Fork Salmon River sedimentation load?

Management Issue: Management flag – is this an "in lieu" issue (is the USFS responsible for this funding)?

Technical Issue: Proposal needs significant modification to clearly describe how the techniques are valid and appropriate to achieve the objectives, and the specific fish and wildlife benefit.


Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

In-lieu funding issue. Proposed tasks appear to be "in lieu of other expenditures authorized or required from other entities under other agreements or provisions of law". (Section 4.(h)(10)(A) of PNW Power Act).
Recommendation:
Inadequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

There is not adequate justification of programmatic need in this proposal. Monitoring is not adequately described nor is the reduction of sediment input. This is an appeal to BPA to reduce sediment delivery from Forest Service roads. Is BPA the appropriate funding source for this road improvement?