FY 1999 proposal 9054
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
9054 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Reduce Erosion, Identify Access and Improve... at Bonn. Power Line Corridor |
Proposal ID | 9054 |
Organization | U.S. Forest Service (USFS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Ken Macdonald And Judy De La Vergne |
Mailing address | 215 Melody Lane Wenatchee, WA 98801 |
Phone / email | / kmacdonald_wenatchee@fs.pnw.us |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Upper Mid-Columbia / Wenatchee |
Short description | |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $57,000 | |
Fringe | $14,000 | |
Supplies | $600 | |
Subcontractor | $40,000 | |
$111,600 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $111,600 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $111,600 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Return to Sponsor for Revision
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Need to provide more detail on the objectives and methods.Management Issue: Management flag – It appears that the Forest Service is proposing work that should be covered by the BPA (in-lieu question).
Comment:
Need to fund from the transmission side rather than the power side of BPAComment:
The monitoring was not very well described. The emphasis on riparian and habitat improvement would likely benefit fish and wildlife, but the proposal was poorly written. Nevertheless the goals of the project seemed worthwhile.