Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Analyze the Persistence and Spatial Dynamics of Snake River Chinook Salmon |
| Proposal ID | 9064 |
| Organization | U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station (RMRS) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Russell F. Thurow |
| Mailing address | 316 E. Myrtle Boise, ID 83702 |
| Phone / email | 2083734377 / rthurow/rmrs_boise@fs.fed.us |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Snake / Salmon |
| Short description | Describe factors influencing the spatial distribution and persistence of wild chinook salmon. |
| Target species | Wild Snake River Spring and Summer Chinook Salmon |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$37,400 |
| Fringe |
|
$7,690 |
| Supplies |
|
$6,000 |
| Operating |
|
$29,500 |
| Travel |
|
$5,500 |
| Indirect |
|
$15,500 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$0 |
| $101,590 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $101,590 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $101,590 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: If water conditions limit the accuracy of redd counts, additional years of research may be required
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes: This project should have been reviewed with the watershed projects Difficult to evaluate since criteria are insufficient to evaluate watershed proposals.
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Reduce by 50% for cost sharing to alleviate in-lieu concerns. Keep spawning ground survey objective; separate out micro-habitat work
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This proposal is well written, states clear methods, and references relevant information. It offers a novel approach that could give illuminating and useful insights for salmon management. The data to be collected are useful independent of the hypotheses being tested.