Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Coordinate/Facilitate Watershed Project Planning/Implementation |
Proposal ID | 9067 |
Organization | Yakima River Watershed Council (YRWC) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | Mel Wagner |
Mailing address | 402 E Yakima Avenue Suite 510 Yakima, WA 98901 |
Phone / email | 5095769042 / yrwc@wolfenet.com |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Yakima |
Short description | FACILITATE AND COORDINATE, PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF WATERSHED PROJECTS TO RESTORE HABITAT, IMPROVE WATER QUALITY AND ENHANCE WATER QUANTITY |
Target species | |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
Personnel |
1 1/2 full time annual salaries |
$48,000 |
Fringe |
20% of above |
$9,600 |
Supplies |
Office supplies, meeting materials and aids, i.e. audio/visuals, documents |
$10,000 |
Operating |
YRWC operating costs: phone, fax, internet e-mail , copying, postage, 25 % of office rental |
$30,000 |
Capital |
Desktop computer, monitor, and printer |
$2,500 |
Travel |
|
$3,000 |
Indirect |
Research, design, and production of public information/ education vehicles, i.e media advertising |
$40,000 |
Subcontractor |
none |
$0 |
Other |
|
$50,000 |
| $193,100 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $193,100 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $193,100 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: MAJOR MILESTONES: Since inception in 1994, YRWC has produced and sent to agency review a draft watershed plan: 20/20 VISION. Inter-Agency Council in operation since December 1996.:
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Explain how conditions will be improved due to this effort (reduced sedimentation, or projects are developed as a result of this effort to do things like reduce sedimentation.) Technical Issue: Specify the measurable objectives and how they will be achieved.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Reduce FTE funding with cost share
Recommendation:
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose after revision
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The revised proposal made little improvements from the original. The original is incomplete and makes no direct or indirect links to Council program measures. It needs to provide more information regarding facilities, monitoring and rationale. Although the project has been going on for approximately five years, the project history and results are not presented in adequate detail.