FY 1999 proposal 9083

Additional documents

TitleType
9083 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleDevelop Tools to Evaluate the Effects of Selective Fisheries on Chinook
Proposal ID9083
OrganizationNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries (NOAA)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameJames B. Scott, Jr.
Mailing address510 Desmond Drive SE, Suite 103 Lacey, WA 98503
Phone / email3607535820 / James.B.Scott@noaa.gov
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinSystemwide / Systemwide
Short descriptionEvaluate potential impact of selective fisheries on coastwide chinook management and stock assessment.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
8910800 Monitoring and Evaluation Modeling Support Complements this proposal by addressing the effects of oceanic conditions on fish migrations.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Subcontractor WDFW; ODFW; USFWS; NWIFC; ADF&G; University of Washington; University of Idaho $189,200
$189,200
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$189,200
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$189,200
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Comments:

Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes

Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes

Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes

Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:


Recommendation:
Fund (low priority)
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Pending
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This is an adequate proposal ranked in the midrange of the set. There is a programmatic need for this study because the present coded wire tag system makes various assumptions about non-selective fisheries and equal distribution of catch. If the region were to use a selective fishery it would wipe out the current assumptions. The proposal is well linked to the Fish and Wildlife Program measures by number and in text. The proposal cites Gorton amendment requirement for consideration of ocean conditions. However, the proposal contains several weaknesses. The background data on what was done for coho is administrative rather than technical. Facilities are not described so that they can be evaluated for adequacy. Objective 2 does not have tasks. Methods could be better explained, and built-in monitoring and evaluation should be provided. The principal investigator is listed as full time when we know he has other projects based on reviewed proposals. It appears he is well over 100% committed; thus, other personnel need to be identified. The proposal needs to be coordinated with 8910800, 9601900 and 9018.