Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Coordinate Assessment and Prioritization of Key Habitats in Methow Basin |
| Proposal ID | 9086 |
| Organization | The Pacific Watershed Institute (PWI) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Jeanette Smith or Patricia Olson |
| Mailing address | 2366 Eastlake Ave. E., Suite 325 Seattle, WA 98102 |
| Phone / email | / jetsmith@pwi.org |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Upper Mid-Columbia / Methow |
| Short description | |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 5509900 |
|
|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$338,000 |
| Fringe |
|
$46,000 |
| Supplies |
|
$34,000 |
| Operating |
|
$24,000 |
| Travel |
|
$30,000 |
| Indirect |
|
$71,000 |
| Subcontractor |
Yakama Indian Nation; USFS - Okanogan National Forest; PNW Research Station; Terra-Logic |
$56,000 |
| $599,000 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $599,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $599,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes: This is a habitat restoration project that should have been reviewed as a watershed project. The criteria used are insufficient to fully evaluate watershed proposals.
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Recommendation:
Fund (low priority)
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Budget constraints. Proposal was found to be technically sound and appropriate but was deferred because other work was judged more urgent and funds were not adequate for all needed work.
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This proposal was well written and justified. It provided background information and literature. Two years of data may not be enough to construct a baseline. It contained inadequate information on the qualifications of the principal investigators. The budget should be scrutinized; the costs appear high.