FY 1999 proposal 9094

Additional documents

TitleType
9094 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleProduce Kokanee Salmon in Net Pens for Release into Lake Roosevelt
Proposal ID9094
OrganizationSpokane Tribe of Indians (STOI)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameKeith Underwood
Mailing addressP.O. Box 100 Wellpinit, WA 99040
Phone / email5092587020 / keithu@iea.com
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinUpper Columbia / Upper Columbia Mainstem
Short descriptionConstruct and operate 20 net pens for rearing kokanee salmon (25,000 fish/pen) to post-smolt size in Lake Roosevelt.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
9104600 Spokane Tribal Hatchery O&M provided
9104700 Sherman Creek Hatchery O&M provided
9500900 Net pen Project Provides necessary support staff for kokanee net pen project
9404300 Lake Roosevelt Monitoring / Data Collection Program Kokanee net pens will provide additional fish which will help to achieve goals (both biological and research) of the LRMDCP.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel 1 part time employee $15,000
Fringe 32% of salaries $4,800
Supplies $1,000
Capital Netpens $148,557
Travel $1,000
Indirect 21.3% $4,643
Subcontractor Lake Roosevelt Development Association; Spokane Tribal Hatchery; Sherman Creek Hatchery (WDFW) $0
$175,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$175,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$175,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Time and resources to build net pens are the major constraints to achieving objectives


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Withdrawn
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Presentation: Kokanee released as yearlings survive better than those released as fry. And, raising fish to a larger size requires more space. This is intended as a one-time low cost project. Volunteers will do the ground work. Funds were allocated in FY 98 but the project has not moved forward because of lack of coordination. It was submitted for FY 99 just to keep it on the books. The Council considers these net pens an expansion of the Scope of Work of the Spokane Tribal Hatchery, therefore this project will have to go through the 3-step process.

Withdrawn by the sponsor.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

FY99 request withdrawn by sponsor
Recommendation:
Lake Roosevelt Hatchery Proposals - Inadequate as a set
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This proposal is for net-pen production of fish to augment ongoing supplementation projects. The proposal does not adequately describe its interactions with other projects. How the work meets the definition of supplementation is not explained. This proposal does not provide the technical justification to allow judgment of whether the project will be successful. The proposal should describe how net pens might impact the ecosystem and its biota and should give assurance that problems are unlikely and monitoring and evaluation would allow problems to be detected and avoided.