Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Technical Support For PATH - James J. Anderson |
| Proposal ID | 9098 |
| Organization | James J. Anderson Consulting |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | James J. Anderson |
| Mailing address | 3700 E. Union St. Seattle, WA 98122 |
| Phone / email | 2065434772 / jim@fish.washington.edu |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Critique of mathemathical aspects of PATH hypotheses. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$46,800 |
| Travel |
|
$2,200 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$0 |
| Other |
|
$1,000 |
| $50,000 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $50,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $50,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Incomplete: Participation in a scientific process should not merely be to "critique". The proposal should demonstrate a more positive relationship to the success of PATH. Appears to duplicate Project # 9700200
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Incomplete: Unable to determine from the proposal
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Incomplete Unable to determine from the proposal
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Credit against 9700200
Recommendation:
Inadequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This was a poorly written proposal and ranked near the bottom of the set in scientific quality. The proposal should stand alone and describe what PATH is. The proposed work should be better related to the Fish and Wildlife Program and other plans. The objectives are vague in relation to specific PATH tasks and no tasks are given for objective 3. It is not clear why there is a need for a separate proposal and funding when the principal investigator is already involved with PATH and other projects that receive funds for it. The scientific quality of the proposal does not warrant additional funding.