FY 1999 proposal 9100

Additional documents

TitleType
9100 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleReestablish Safe Access into Tributaries of the Yakima Subbasin
Proposal ID9100
OrganizationYakama Indian Nation, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (YIN, WDFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameScott Nicolai
Mailing addressP.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948
Phone / email5098656262 / snicolai@yakama.com
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Mid-Columbia / Yakima
Short descriptionReestablish passage over artificial barriers into ten tributaries, to regain over 100 miles of anadromous habitat. Protect reaccessed habitat through fencing, and property and conservation easement purchase.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $62,904
Fringe $25,767
Supplies $32,600
Capital $90,000
Travel $3,336
Indirect $57,086
Subcontractor $125,108
$396,801
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$396,801
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$396,801
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Time constraints include construction season limitations, contractor schedules, permitting delays, and coordinating with irrigators to avoid conflicts with irrigation deliveries. Time constraints include weather limitations. Time constraints include construction season limitations, contractor schedules permitting delays, and coordinating with irrigators to avoid conflicts with irrigation deliveries. Time constraints include land availability, potential limitations of conservation easement recipients, weather limitations on land appraisals, contractor scheduling (for fence construction).


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Technical Issue: Same as original FY98 proposal – need to provide the additional information that was provided in FY98, plus an explanation of new work in FY99 resulting from FY98 funding.

Technical Issue: Added a new objective for FY99, but not asking for additional money for that objective until FY2000 – is this objective already funded based on the 98 program?


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Reduction due to cost sharing with WDFW
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This is a well-written proposal for needed work. The proposal does not describe whether the re-colonization will be natural or from artificial production. Monitoring and the expected benefits should be described in more detail.