FY 1999 proposal 9103

Additional documents

TitleType
9103 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleUpper Deschutes Basin Watershed Coordinator/Council Support
Proposal ID9103
OrganizationDeschutes County Watershed Council (DCWC)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameBarbara J. Lee
Mailing addressP.O. Box 894 Bend, OR 97709
Phone / email5413837146 / bjlee@transport.com
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 1999
Province / SubbasinLower Mid-Columbia / Deschutes
Short descriptionSupport the Council’s coordination of watershed activities through funding staff wages and training, administrative and operational expenses, and equipment and software acquisition
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 1999 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 1999 cost
Personnel $18,000
Fringe $4,500
Supplies $1,000
Capital $3,500
Travel $2,000
Indirect $2,500
Subcontractor $0
Other $600
$32,100
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost$32,100
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 1999 budget request$32,100
FY 1999 forecast from 1998$0
% change from forecast0.ToString("0.0%"))
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Outyear budget totals

(working on it)


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Technical Issue: Need to provide more detail on the methods, measurable objectives, tasks, and expected results.

Technical Issue: Need to describe a monitoring and evaluation plan to determine if the expected results are achieved.


Recommendation:
Not fundable
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Presentation: The sponsor did not give a presentation.

Questions/Answers:

How were the WTWG concerns addressed in the revised proposal?

How does this project relate to the objectives and specific resident measures in the Council's Program?

Screening Criteria: No. The proposal doesn't meet a specific council measure.

Technical Criteria: No. This is more of a wildlife proposal than anything else.

Programmatic Criteria: No. The proposal doesn't meet criteria 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, and 18

General Comment: This work should be coordinated with other projects in Upper Deschutes Basin.


Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

See CBFWA Committee Comments
Recommendation:
Inadequate after revision
Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

The revised proposal does not provide enough detail on the watershed assessment such as who will implement it and what protocols will be used. The proposal does not describe how enhancement projects will be selected. Scientific oversight and monitoring are not sufficiently addressed. It is not integrated with other BPA habitat projects in the Deschutes.